Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Drashti Pathak
dblp:259/8615
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Program verification · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Logic in computer science · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program verification › probabilistic verification
probabilistic program verification |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Data-Driven Invariant Learning for Probabilistic Programs (Extended Abstract) · IJCAI 2023 Data-Driven Invariant Learning for Probabilistic Programs · CAV (1) 2022 |
Program verification
invariant generation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Data-Driven Invariant Learning for Probabilistic Programs (Extended Abstract) · IJCAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
regression |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Data-Driven Invariant Learning for Probabilistic Programs · CAV (1) 2022 |
Logic in computer science › program semantics
probabilistic programming semantics |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Data-Driven Invariant Learning for Probabilistic Programs (Extended Abstract) · IJCAI 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
regression · 2.5piecewise continuous invariants · 1.3data-driven invariant learning · 1.3weakest pre-expectation · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Data-driven invariant learning for probabilistic programs
Jialu Bao, Nitesh Trivedi, Drashti Pathak, Justin Hsu, Subhajit Roy 0001 |
Formal Methods Syst. Des. | 3 |
| 2023 | Data-Driven Invariant Learning for Probabilistic Programs (Extended Abstract)abstractThe weakest pre-expectation framework from Morgan and McIver for deductive verification of probabilistic programs generalizes binary state assertions to real-valued expectations to measure expected values of expressions over probabilistic program variables. While loop-free programs can be analyzed by mechanically transforming expectations, verifying programs with loops requires finding an invariant expectation. We view invariant expectation synthesis as a regression problem: given an input state, predict the average value of the post-expectation in the output distribution. With this perspective, we develop the first data-driven invariant synthesis method for probabilistic programs. Unlike prior work on probabilistic invariant inference, our approach learns piecewise continuous invariants without relying on template expectations. We also develop a data-driven approach to learn sub-invariants from data, which can be used to upper- or lower-bound expected values. We implement our approaches and demonstrate their effectiveness on a variety of benchmarks from the probabilistic programming literature. Jialu Bao, Nitesh Trivedi, Drashti Pathak, Justin Hsu, Subhajit Roy 0001 |
IJCAI | 3 |
| 2022 | Data-Driven Invariant Learning for Probabilistic ProgramsabstractAbstract Morgan and McIver’s weakest pre-expectation framework is one of the most well-established methods for deductive verification of probabilistic programs. Roughly, the idea is to generalize binary state assertions to real-valued expectations, which can measure expected values of probabilistic program quantities. While loop-free programs can be analyzed by mechanically transforming expectations, verifying loops usually requires finding an invariant expectation, a difficult task. We propose a new view of invariant expectation synthesis as a regression problem: given an input state, predict the average value of the post-expectation in the output distribution. Guided by this perspective, we develop the first data-driven invariant synthesis method for probabilistic programs. Unlike prior work on probabilistic invariant inference, our approach can learn piecewise continuous invariants without relying on template expectations. We also develop a data-driven approach to learn sub-invariants from data, which can be used to upper- or lower-bound expected values. We implement our approaches and demonstrate their effectiveness on a variety of benchmarks from the probabilistic programming literature. Jialu Bao, Nitesh Trivedi, Drashti Pathak, Justin Hsu, Subhajit Roy 0001 |
CAV (1) | 3 |