Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrew Turner

dblp:26/10027 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 50% Performance modeling and evaluation · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.212013
C-MART: Benchmarking the Cloud · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2013
Cloud and datacenter computing
cloud management
0.212013
C-MART: Benchmarking the Cloud · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2013
Performance modeling and evaluation › benchmarking › distributed system benchmarking
cloud benchmarking
0.012013
C-MART: Benchmarking the Cloud · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2013
Cloud and datacenter computing
resource provisioning
0.012013
C-MART: Benchmarking the Cloud · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

workload generation · 0.2client emulation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Automated service monitoring in the deployment of ARCHER2
abstract
Summary The ARCHER2 service, a CPU based HPE Cray EX system with 750,080 cores (5860 nodes), has been deployed throughout 2020 and 2021, going into full service in December of 2021. A key part of the work during this deployment was the integration of ARCHER2 into our local monitoring systems. As ARCHER2 was one of the very first large‐scale EX deployments, this involved close collaboration and development work with the HPE team through a global pandemic situation where collaboration and co‐working was significantly more challenging than usual. The deployment included the creation of automated checks and visual representations of system status which needed to be made available to external parties for diagnosis and interpretation. We will describe how these checks have been deployed and how data gathered played a key role in the deployment of ARCHER2, the commissioning of the plant infrastructure, the conduct of HPL runs for submission to the Top500 and contractual monitoring of the availability of the ARCHER2 service during its commissioning and early life.
Kieran Leach, Philip Cass, Steven Robson, Eimantas Kazakevicius, Martin Lafferty, Andrew Turner, Alan Simpson
Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp.6
2020 Investigating Applications on the A64FX
abstract
The A64FX processor from Fujitsu, being designed for computational simulation and machine learning applications, has the potential for unprecedented performance in HPC systems. In this paper, we evaluate the A64FX by benchmarking against a range of production HPC platforms that cover a number of processor technologies. We investigate the performance of complex scientific applications across multiple nodes, as well as single node and mini-kernel benchmarks. This paper finds that the performance of the A64FX processor across our chosen benchmarks often significantly exceeds other platforms, even without specific application optimisations for the processor instruction set or hardware. However, this is not true for all the benchmarks we have undertaken. Furthermore, the specific configuration of applications can have an impact on the runtime and performance experienced.
Adrian Jackson, Michèle Weiland, Nick Brown 0002, Andrew Turner, Mark Parsons 0001
CLUSTER4
2013 C-MART: Benchmarking the Cloud
abstract
Cloud computing environments provide on-demand resource provisioning, allowing applications to elastically scale. However, application benchmarks currently being used to test cloud management systems are not designed for this purpose. This results in resource underprovisioning and quality-of-service (QoS) violations when systems tested using these benchmarks are deployed in production environments. We present C-MART, a benchmark designed to emulate a modern web application running in a cloud computing environment. It is designed using the cloud computing paradigm of elastic scalability at every application tier and utilizes modern web-based technologies such as HTML5, AJAX, jQuery, and SQLite. C-MART consists of a web application, client emulator, deployment server, and scaling API. The deployment server automatically deploys and configures the test environment in orders of magnitude less time than current benchmarks. The scaling API allows users to define and provision their own customized datacenter. The client emulator generates the web workload for the application by emulating complex and varied client behaviors, including decisions based on page content and prior history. We show that C-MART can detect problems in management systems that previous benchmarks fail to identify, such as an increase from 4.4 to 50 percent error in predicting server CPU utilization and resource underprovisioning in 22 percent of QoS measurements.
Andrew Turner, Andrew Fox, John I. Payne, Hyong S. Kim 0001
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.1
2012 Resource contention-aware Virtual Machine management for enterprise applications
abstract
Consolidating Virtual Machines (VMs) in data centers is desirable as it reduces hardware and power costs. However the performances of VMs on shared physical servers are not isolated from each other as they contend for the same server resources. This contention degrades the performance of delay sensitive applications and can increase response times by three orders of magnitude at high contention levels. In order to achieve Service Level Agreements (SLAs) under VM consolidation, resources must be allocated by considering the performance effects of contention. We therefore present VARACO, a contention-aware VM management system to achieve Quality-of-Service (QoS) targets for multi-tier web applications. VARACO models applications' performances online using 13 server resource utilization and contention metrics. Resources are dynamically allocated using these models to achieve QoS targets. Our results show that application- level performance can be modeled 130% more accurately when resource contention is considered. We demonstrate VARACO by achieving a 90thpercentile response time target of a sample application under VM consolidation.
Andrew Fox, Andrew Turner, Hyong S. Kim 0001
GLOBECOM2
2009 Rapid Chemistry Portals through Engaging Researchers
abstract
In this study, we apply a methodology for rapid development of portlets for scientific computing to the domain of computational chemistry. We report results in terms of the portals delivered, the changes made to our methodology and the experience gained in terms of interaction with domain-specialists. Our major contributions are: several web portals for teaching and research in computational chemistry; a successful transition to having our development tool used by the domain specialist as opposed by us, the developers; and an updated version of our methodology and technology for rapid development of portlets for computational science, which is free for anyone to pick up and use.
Jos Koetsier, Andrew Turner, Patricia Richardson, Jano I. van Hemert
eScience2