Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrew D. Christian

dblp:26/3656 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 77% Immersive interaction · 13% Haptics and multimodal interaction · 10%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Robot manipulation · 71% Motion planning and robot control · 29%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments
public displays
0.022000
Speak out and annoy someone: experience with intelligent kiosks · CHI 2000
Digital Smart Kiosk Project · CHI 1998
Robotics › Robot manipulation › continuum robot
flexible robot
0.021990
Initial experiments with a flexible robot · ICRA 1990
Design considerations for an earth based flexible robotic system · ICRA 1989
Robotics › Robot manipulation
robot design
0.021990
Initial experiments with a flexible robot · ICRA 1990
Design considerations for an earth based flexible robotic system · ICRA 1989
Immersive interaction
animated agents
0.012000
Speak out and annoy someone: experience with intelligent kiosks · CHI 2000
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
vibration suppression
0.011990
Initial experiments with a flexible robot · ICRA 1990
Haptics and multimodal interaction
multimodal interaction
0.011998
Digital Smart Kiosk Project · CHI 1998
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot dynamics
0.021990
Initial experiments with a flexible robot · ICRA 1990
Design considerations for an earth based flexible robotic system · ICRA 1989

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sonar sensing · 0.0machine vision · 0.0infrared sensing · 0.0system design · 0.0nondimensional analysis · 0.0ramp command · 0.0acceleration command · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 Speak out and annoy someone: experience with intelligent kiosks
abstract
An intelligent kiosk is a public information kiosk that senses the presence of humans and communicates in a natural way. To examine issues of human-kiosk interaction, we have built and deployed two versions of intelligent kiosks. The first kiosk design combines machine vision to locate and track people in the vicinity with an animated talking head that focuses on clients and talks to them. The second kiosk design uses infrared and sonar sensors to sense clients and multiple interacting agents to communicate with the client.
Andrew D. Christian, Brian L. Avery
CHI1
1998 Digital Smart Kiosk Project
abstract
Article Free Access Share on Digital smart kiosk project Authors: Andrew D. Christian Cambridge Research Laboratory, Digital Equipment Corporation, One Kendall Square, Building 700, Cambridge, MA Cambridge Research Laboratory, Digital Equipment Corporation, One Kendall Square, Building 700, Cambridge, MAView Profile , Brian L. Avery Cambridge Research Laboratory, Digital Equipment Corporation, One Kendall Square, Building 700, Cambridge, MA Cambridge Research Laboratory, Digital Equipment Corporation, One Kendall Square, Building 700, Cambridge, MAView Profile Authors Info & Claims CHI '98: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsJanuary 1998 Pages 155–162https://doi.org/10.1145/274644.274668Published:01 January 1998Publication History 39citation1,435DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations39Total Downloads1,435Last 12 Months295Last 6 weeks58 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteeReaderPDF
Andrew D. Christian, Brian L. Avery
CHI1
1990 Initial experiments with a flexible robot
abstract
A flexible three-degree-of-freedom robot is described, and its behavior is compared with a simple model of a vibrating system. The robot has three rotary joints and two flexible steel links, causing it to exhibit many complicated modes of vibration. A nondimensional analysis of the model showing how it responds to ramp commands and acceleration commands is presented, and the results are compared with those for the actual robot. Using the model, one can select input commands that minimize the vibration of the robot.>
Andrew D. Christian, Warren P. Seering
ICRA1
1989 Design considerations for an earth based flexible robotic system
abstract
The problems of designing a robot with joint and link flexibility are discussed. The relationship between the deflection of the robot under gravity is correlated with the fundamental frequency of vibration. Different types of link geometry are considered, evaluating the flexibility potential of different materials. Some general conclusions and guidelines for constructing a flexible robot are given. It is found that, for maximum flexibility with minimum stiffness, the best material choice for the links is titanium. Some aluminium alloys may be inexpensive alternatives, but the fatigue characteristics of aluminium are unacceptable in most applications. Coiled springs give very little stiffness in comparison to their strength, but their weight makes them unusable in all but planar applications.>
Andrew D. Christian, Warren P. Seering
ICRA1