Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Maria A. Kazandjieva

dblp:26/4263 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 7 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
6 papers
Internet of things and sensor networks · 48% Wireless networking · 30% Internet architecture and protocols · 9%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 67% Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 33%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Programming languages and type systems · 100%

Topics — the 20 heaviest of 23, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Wireless networking › medium access control
collision avoidance
0.112010
Granting silence to avoid wireless collisions · ICNP 2010
Wireless networking
medium access control
0.112010
Granting silence to avoid wireless collisions · ICNP 2010
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
sensor deployment
0.112010
Visualizing sensor network data with Powertron · SenSys 2010
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
sensor network visualization
0.112010
Visualizing sensor network data with Powertron · SenSys 2010
Wireless networking
wireless mesh network
0.112010
Granting silence to avoid wireless collisions · ICNP 2010
Network management and operations
network monitoring
0.112009
Demo abstract: SWAT: Know your network · IPSN 2009
Internet of things and sensor networks
wireless sensor network
0.112009
Demo abstract: SWAT: Know your network · IPSN 2009
Programming languages and type systems › language-based security
memory safety
0.112009
Surviving sensor network software faults · SOSP 2009
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
error recovery
0.112009
Surviving sensor network software faults · SOSP 2009
Embedded and real-time systems › embedded software › embedded operating systems
sensor node operating system
0.112009
Surviving sensor network software faults · SOSP 2009
Embedded and real-time systems › embedded software › embedded operating systems
TinyOS
0.112009
Surviving sensor network software faults · SOSP 2009
Internet of things and sensor networks › iot networks › iot communication › sensor network communication
link burstiness
0.112008
The beta-factor: measuring wireless link burstiness · SenSys 2008
Wireless networking › wireless link
wireless link characterization
0.112008
The beta-factor: measuring wireless link burstiness · SenSys 2008
Network measurement and analytics
wireless network measurement
0.112008
SWAT: enabling wireless network measurements · SenSys 2008
Internet of things and sensor networks › low-power wireless
802.15.4 sensor networks
0.012010
Granting silence to avoid wireless collisions · ICNP 2010
Internet of things and sensor networks › low-power wireless › low-power and lossy networks
collection tree protocol
0.012010
Visualizing sensor network data with Powertron · SenSys 2010
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
wireless sensor network routing
0.012010
Visualizing sensor network data with Powertron · SenSys 2010
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
network diagnosis
0.012009
Demo abstract: SWAT: Know your network · IPSN 2009
Internet architecture and protocols
protocol design
0.012009
The case for a network protocol isolation layer · SenSys 2009
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
data collection protocol
0.012008
The beta-factor: measuring wireless link burstiness · SenSys 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

recovery units · 0.2compiler and runtime extensions · 0.2web-based visualization · 0.1simulation · 0.1protocol design · 0.1packet statistics analysis · 0.1empirical measurement · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 CTP: An efficient, robust, and reliable collection tree protocol for wireless sensor networks
abstract
We describe CTP, a collection routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. CTP uses three techniques to provide efficient, robust, and reliable routing in highly dynamic network conditions. CTP's link estimator accurately estimates link qualities by using feedback from both the data and control planes, using information from multiple layers through narrow, platform-independent interfaces. Second, CTP uses the Trickle algorithm to time the control traffic, sending few beacons in stable topologies yet quickly adapting to changes. Finally, CTP actively probes the topology with data traffic, quickly discovering and fixing routing failures. Through experiments on 13 different testbeds, encompassing seven platforms, six link layers, and multiple densities and frequencies, and detailed observations of a long-running sensor network application that uses CTP, we study how these three techniques contribute to CTP's overall performance.
Omprakash Gnawali, Rodrigo Fonseca, Kyle Jamieson, Maria A. Kazandjieva, David Moss, Philip Alexander Levis
ACM Trans. Sens. Networks4
2010 Granting silence to avoid wireless collisions
abstract
We describe grant-to-send, a novel collision avoidance algorithm for wireless mesh networks. Rather than announce packets it intends to send, a node using grant-to-send announces packets it expects to hear others send. We present evidence that inverting collision avoidance in this way greatly improves wireless mesh performance. Evaluating four protocols from 802.11 meshes and 802.15.4 sensor networks, we find that grant-to-send matches or outperforms CSMA and RTS/CTS in all cases. For example, in a 4-hop UDP flow, grant to-send can achieve 96% of the theoretical maximum throughput while maintaining a 99.9% packet delivery ratio. Grant-to-send is also general enough to replace protocol-specific collision avoidance mechanisms common to sensor network protocols. Grant-to-send is simple. For example, incorporating it into 802.11 requires only 11 lines of driver code and no hardware changes. Furthermore, as it reuses existing 802.11 mechanisms, grant-to-send inter-operates with current networks and can be incrementally deployed.
Maria A. Kazandjieva, Philip Alexander Levis
ICNP3
2010 Visualizing sensor network data with Powertron
abstract
Powertron is a web-based application that visualizes wireless sensor network deployment data. In this particular demo, we use Powertron to show application-level power data collected from more than 250 sensor nodes. In addition, we expose the routing layer of the deployment by providing real-time interactive visual representation of links, routes, and CTP-related statistics. We hope that the community will have feedback on how such a tool can be extended and generalized to fit a variety of wireless sensor network applications.
Maria A. Kazandjieva, Omprakash Gnawali, Philip Alexander Levis
SenSys1
2009 Demo abstract: SWAT: Know your network
Kannan Srinivasan 0001, Maria A. Kazandjieva, Edward S. Kim, Philip Alexander Levis
IPSN2
2009 The case for a network protocol isolation layer
abstract
Network protocols are typically designed and tested individually. In practice, however, applications use multiple protocols concurrently. This discrepancy can lead to failures from unanticipated interactions between protocols.
Maria A. Kazandjieva, Philip Alexander Levis
SenSys2
2009 Surviving sensor network software faults
abstract
We describe Neutron, a version of the TinyOS operating system that efficiently recovers from memory safety bugs. Where existing schemes reboot an entire node on an error, Neutron's compiler and runtime extensions divide programs into recovery units and reboot only the faulting unit. The TinyOS kernel itself is a recovery unit: a kernel safety violation appears to applications as the processor being unavailable for 10-20 milliseconds.
Yang Chen 0024, Omprakash Gnawali, Maria A. Kazandjieva, Philip Alexander Levis, John Regehr
SOSP3
2008 The beta-factor: measuring wireless link burstiness
abstract
Measuring 802.15.4 reception in three testbeds, we find that most intermediate links are bursty: they shift between poor and good delivery. We present a metric to measure this link burstiness and name it β. We find that link burstiness affects protocol performance and that β can predict the effects. We show that measuring β allows us to reason about how long a protocol should pause after encountering a packet failure to reduce its transmission cost. We find that using β as a guide to setting a single constant in a standard sensor network data collection protocol reduces its average transmission cost by 15%. In addition to data from 802.15.4 testbeds, we examine traces from 802.11b networks and find β has a broader relevance in the wireless domain.
Kannan Srinivasan 0001, Maria A. Kazandjieva, Saatvik Agarwal, Philip Alexander Levis
SenSys2
2008 SWAT: enabling wireless network measurements
abstract
Measuring low-level wireless network properties allows researchers to understand how protocols and applications perform in different environments. In this demo, we present SWAT - a software tool that automates gathering and analysis of network measurements. SWAT provides an interface for configuring experimental parameters in a network. It collects raw packet statistics such as the received signal strength and chip error, and provides modules for calculating and visualizing various metrics derived from these statistics.
Kannan Srinivasan 0001, Maria A. Kazandjieva, Edward S. Kim, Philip Alexander Levis
SenSys2