Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jeffrey Goos

dblp:26/4307 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1989
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Routing and switching · 77% Network performance modeling · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Routing and switching › routing algorithms
optimal routing
0.011989
Fairness of Optimal Routing in Virtual Circuit Data Networks · INFOCOM 1989
Network performance modeling
delay analysis
0.011989
Fairness of Optimal Routing in Virtual Circuit Data Networks · INFOCOM 1989

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

objective function design · 0.0numerical study · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1989 Fairness of Optimal Routing in Virtual Circuit Data Networks
abstract
Fairness in multiple-path optimal routing algorithms in virtual circuit data networks is investigated. Fairness measures are developed to evaluate optimal routings. Several objective functions are considered to be possible replacements of the average packet delay objective function that is widely used in optimal routing algorithms, and evaluated for various network and traffic configurations. A numerical study using the fairness measures developed shows that the objective function which is in the integral form of the average packet delay achieves perfect fairness while sacrificing only a nominal increase in the average packet delay. The numerical study also confirms the conjecture by D.P. Bertsekas and R.G. Gallager (1987) that the form of objective function does not affect the average packet delay in any significant way.>
Wei Kang Tsai, Pierce E. Cantrell, Jeffrey Goos
INFOCOM3