Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jeffrey Goos
dblp:26/4307
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1989
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Routing and switching · 77% Network performance modeling · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Routing and switching › routing algorithms
optimal routing |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Fairness of Optimal Routing in Virtual Circuit Data Networks · INFOCOM 1989 |
Network performance modeling
delay analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Fairness of Optimal Routing in Virtual Circuit Data Networks · INFOCOM 1989 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
objective function design · 0.0numerical study · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1989 | Fairness of Optimal Routing in Virtual Circuit Data NetworksabstractFairness in multiple-path optimal routing algorithms in virtual circuit data networks is investigated. Fairness measures are developed to evaluate optimal routings. Several objective functions are considered to be possible replacements of the average packet delay objective function that is widely used in optimal routing algorithms, and evaluated for various network and traffic configurations. A numerical study using the fairness measures developed shows that the objective function which is in the integral form of the average packet delay achieves perfect fairness while sacrificing only a nominal increase in the average packet delay. The numerical study also confirms the conjecture by D.P. Bertsekas and R.G. Gallager (1987) that the form of objective function does not affect the average packet delay in any significant way.> Wei Kang Tsai, Pierce E. Cantrell, Jeffrey Goos |
INFOCOM | 3 |