Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Preeti Bhargava
dblp:26/5143
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 5 · 5 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Recommender systems · 33% Data mining · 33% Web and social media mining · 33% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers |
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments › context-aware computing
context-aware middleware |
0.3 | 2 | 2012 | An ontological context model for representing a situation and the design of an intelligent context-aware middleware · UbiComp 2012 RoCoMo: a generic ontology for context modeling, representation and reasoning in a context-aware middleware · UbiComp 2012 |
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments › context-aware computing
context modeling |
0.3 | 2 | 2012 | An ontological context model for representing a situation and the design of an intelligent context-aware middleware · UbiComp 2012 RoCoMo: a generic ontology for context modeling, representation and reasoning in a context-aware middleware · UbiComp 2012 |
Recommender systems
collaborative filtering |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Who, What, When, and Where: Multi-Dimensional Collaborative Recommendations Using Tensor Factorization on Sparse User-Generated Data · WWW 2015 |
Data mining › multidimensional data analysis › multiway data analysis › tensor analysis
tensor factorization |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Who, What, When, and Where: Multi-Dimensional Collaborative Recommendations Using Tensor Factorization on Sparse User-Generated Data · WWW 2015 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
ontology |
0.1 | 2 | 2012 | An ontological context model for representing a situation and the design of an intelligent context-aware middleware · UbiComp 2012 RoCoMo: a generic ontology for context modeling, representation and reasoning in a context-aware middleware · UbiComp 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
ontology engineering · 0.3ontology design · 0.3OWL · 0.3coupled tensor and matrix factorization · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Unsupervised Modeling of Users' Interests from their Facebook Profiles and ActivitiesabstractUser interest profiles have become essential for personalizing information streams and services, and user interfaces and experiences. In today's world, social networks such as Facebook or Twitter provide users with a powerful platform for interest expression and can, thus, act as a rich content source for automated user interest modeling. This, however, poses significant challenges because the user generated content on them consists of free unstructured text. In addition, users may not explicitly post or tweet about everything that interests them. Moreover, their interests evolve over time. In this paper, we propose a novel unsupervised algorithm and system that addresses these challenges. It models a broad range of an individual user's explicit and implicit interests from her social network profile and activities without any user input. We perform extensive evaluation of our system, and algorithm, with a dataset consisting of 488 active Facebook users' profiles and demonstrate that it can accurately estimate a user's interests in practice. Preeti Bhargava, Oliver Brdiczka, Michael Roberts |
IUI | 1 |
| 2015 | Who, What, When, and Where: Multi-Dimensional Collaborative Recommendations Using Tensor Factorization on Sparse User-Generated DataabstractGiven the abundance of online information available to mobile users, particularly tourists and weekend travelers, recommender systems that effectively filter this information and suggest interesting participatory opportunities will become increasingly important. Previous work has explored recommending interesting locations; however, users would also benefit from recommendations for activities in which to participate at those locations along with suitable times and days. Thus, systems that provide collaborative recommendations involving multiple dimensions such as location, activities and time would enhance the overall experience of users.The relationship among these dimensions can be modeled by higher-order matrices called tensors which are then solved by tensor factorization. However, these tensors can be extremely sparse. In this paper, we present a system and an approach for performing multi-dimensional collaborative recommendations for Who (User), What (Activity), When (Time) and Where (Location), using tensor factorization on sparse user-generated data. We formulate an objective function which simultaneously factorizes coupled tensors and matrices constructed from heterogeneous data sources. We evaluate our system and approach on large-scale real world data sets consisting of 588,000 Flickr photos collected from three major metro regions in USA. We compare our approach with several state-of-the-art baselines and demonstrate that it outperforms all of them. Preeti Bhargava, Thomas Phan, Juhan Lee |
WWW | 1 |
| 2014 | SenseMe: a system for continuous, on-device, and multi-dimensional context and activity recognitionabstractIn order to make context-aware systems more effective and provide timely, personalized and relevant information to a user, the context or situation of the user must be clearly defined along several dimensions. To this end, the system needs to simultaneously recognize multiple dimensions of the user' Preeti Bhargava, Nick Gramsky, Ashok K. Agrawala |
MobiQuitous | 1 |
| 2012 | RoCoMo: a generic ontology for context modeling, representation and reasoning in a context-aware middlewareabstractWe describe an abstract, generic and extensible ontology, the Rover Context Model Ontology (RoCoMO), which is currently being designed and developed to model and represent context in an intelligent context-aware middleware system, called Rover II. The Rover Context Model (RoCoM) is the underlying context model for Rover II and is centered on four primitives that can be used to represent a situation: entity, event, activity and relationship. The ontology is expressed using the Web Ontology Language (OWL) and includes two components -- RoCoM Core Ontology and the RoCoM Application Ontology. We also illustrate its usage with the aid of a public safety application called M-Urgency that is currently deployed at the UMD campus. Preeti Bhargava, Shivsubramani Krishnamoorthy, Ashok K. Agrawala |
UbiComp | 1 |
| 2012 | An ontological context model for representing a situation and the design of an intelligent context-aware middlewareabstractA major challenge of context models is to balance simplicity, generality, usability and extensibility. It is also important that the model be practical and implementable. In pursuit of this goal, this paper proposes a context model, Rover Context Model (RoCoM), structured around four primitives that can be used to represent and model any situation and activity: entities, events, relationships, and activities. It introduces the notion of templates of context for each primitive and describes, albeit briefly, the RoCoM Ontology (RoCoMO). It also describes the design and architecture of an abstract, generic and intelligent context-aware middleware called Rover II. We propose this framework as a solution to address the context problem as a whole, and be usable in many domains. We also illustrate its application with the aid of a context-aware public safety application that is deployed in the UMD campus. Preeti Bhargava, Shivsubramani Krishnamoorthy, Ashok K. Agrawala |
UbiComp | 1 |
| 2012 | Locus: An Indoor Localization, Tracking and Navigation System for Multi-story Buildings Using Heuristics Derived from Wi-Fi Signal Strength
Preeti Bhargava, Shivsubramani Krishnamoorthy, Aditya Karkada Nakshathri, Matthew Mah, Ashok K. Agrawala |
MobiQuitous | 1 |
| 2012 | Representing and Managing the Context of a SituationabstractThe importance of information for the appropriate handling of any situation is well recognized. We, as human beings, use context not only to interpret available information, but also to seek additional relevant, missing information. Most information systems, which support human decision-making, process context inadequately. Moreover, when some context is considered, the structure is often so rigid that, but for very restricted applications, such systems are not usable. In order to integrate context-handling capabilities with an information integration system, we need a context model for representing context that can efficiently acquire, maintain and integrate contextual information and make it available to applications on demand. In this paper, we present such a model and describe the design of Rover II, a situation-handling platform which supports integration of context-aware applications. The system manages context by constructing a situation graph which dynamically reflects the relevant situation information. We illustrate the use of Rover II with M-Urgency, a public safety application providing audio and video support for emergency help. This system is being deployed for the University of Maryland campus community of 44 000 students, faculty and staff. Shivsubramani Krishnamoorthy, Preeti Bhargava, Matthew Mah, Ashok K. Agrawala |
Comput. J. | 2 |