Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Cameron H. Engh

dblp:26/6462 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Image and video processing · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Human-robot interaction · 57% Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 43%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing
video stabilization
0.112008
Application and evaluation of spatiotemporal enhancement of live aerial video using temporally local mosaics · CVPR 2008
Human-robot interaction › field robotics
human-robot interaction for search and rescue
0.012010
UAV video coverage quality maps and prioritized indexing for wilderness search and rescue · HRI 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.2georegistration · 0.2temporally local mosaics · 0.2real-time processing · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 UAV video coverage quality maps and prioritized indexing for wilderness search and rescue
abstract
Video-equipped mini unmanned aerial vehicles (mini-UAVs) are becoming increasingly popular for surveillance, remote sensing, law enforcement, and search and rescue operations, all of which rely on thorough coverage of a target observation area. However, coverage is not simply a matter of seeing the area (visibility) but of seeing it well enough to allow detection of targets of interest, a quality we here call "see-ability". Video flashlights, mosaics, or other geospatial compositions of the video may help place the video in context and convey that an area was observed, but not necessarily how well or how often. This paper presents a method for using UAV-acquired video georegistered to terrain and aerial reference imagery to create geospatial video coverage quality maps and indices that indicate relative video quality based on detection factors such as image resolution, number of observations, and variety of viewing angles. When used for offline post-analysis of the video, or for online review, these maps also enable geospatial quality-filtered or prioritized non-sequential access to the video. We present examples of static and dynamic see-ability coverage maps in wilderness search-and-rescue scenarios, along with examples of prioritized non-sequential video access. We also present the results of a user study demonstrating the correlation between see-ability computation and human detection performance.
Bryan S. Morse, Cameron H. Engh, Michael A. Goodrich
HRI2
2008 Application and evaluation of spatiotemporal enhancement of live aerial video using temporally local mosaics
abstract
Camera-equipped mini-UAVs are popular for many applications, including search and surveillance, but video from them is commonly plagued with distracting jittery motions and disorienting rotations that make it difficult for human viewers to detect objects of interest and infer spatial relationships. For time-critical search situations there are also inherent tradeoffs between detection and search speed. These problems make the use of dynamic mosaics to expand the spatiotemporal properties of the video appealing. However, for many applications it may not be necessary to maintain full mosaics of all of the video but to mosaic and retain only a number of recent (temporally local) frames, still providing a larger field of view and effectively longer temporal view as well as natural stabilization and consistent orientation. This paper presents and evaluates a real-time system for displaying live video to human observers in search situations by using temporally local mosaics while avoiding masking effects from dropped or noisy frames. Its primary contribution is an empirical study of the effectiveness of using such methods for enhancing human detection of objects of interest, which shows that temporally local mosaics increase task performance and are easier for humans to use than non-mosaiced methods, including stabilized video.
Bryan S. Morse, Damon Gerhardt, Cameron H. Engh, Michael A. Goodrich, Nathan D. Rasmussen, Daniel R. Thornton, Dennis Eggett
CVPR3