Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Abhi Gupta
dblp:260/7149
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Generative modeling · 34% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 26% Motion planning and robot control · 26% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
conditional generation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Is Conditional Generative Modeling all you need for Decision Making? · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
conditional generative model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Is Conditional Generative Modeling all you need for Decision Making? · ICLR 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
hierarchical planning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Compositional Foundation Models for Hierarchical Planning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot dynamics
inverse dynamics |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Compositional Foundation Models for Hierarchical Planning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › task planning
long-horizon task planning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Compositional Foundation Models for Hierarchical Planning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Is Conditional Generative Modeling all you need for Decision Making? · ICLR 2023 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot learning
visuomotor coordination |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Compositional Foundation Models for Hierarchical Planning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Compositional Foundation Models for Hierarchical Planning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
video diffusion model |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Compositional Foundation Models for Hierarchical Planning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sequence modeling · 0.7large language model · 0.7iterative refinement · 0.7foundation model · 0.7conditional generative modeling · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Is Conditional Generative Modeling all you need for Decision Making?
Anurag Ajay, Yilun Du, Abhi Gupta, Josh Tenenbaum, Tommi S. Jaakkola, Pulkit Agrawal 0001 |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2023 | Compositional Foundation Models for Hierarchical PlanningabstractTo make effective decisions in novel environments with long-horizon goals, it is crucial to engage in hierarchical reasoning across spatial and temporal scales. This entails planning abstract subgoal sequences, visually reasoning about the underlying plans, and executing actions in accordance with the devised plan through visual-motor control. We propose Compositional Foundation Models for Hierarchical Planning (HiP), a foundation model which leverages multiple expert foundation model trained on language, vision and action data individually jointly together to solve long-horizon tasks. We use a large language model to construct symbolic plans that are grounded in the environment through a large video diffusion model. Generated video plans are then grounded to visual-motor control, through an inverse dynamics model that infers actions from generated videos. To enable effective reasoning within this hierarchy, we enforce consistency between the models via iterative refinement. We illustrate the efficacy and adaptability of our approach in three different long-horizon table-top manipulation tasks. Anurag Ajay, Seungwook Han, Yilun Du, Shuang Li 0013, Abhi Gupta, Tommi S. Jaakkola, Josh Tenenbaum, Leslie Pack Kaelbling, Akash Srivastava, Pulkit Agrawal 0001 |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2020 | SQUIRL: Robust and Efficient Learning from Video Demonstration of Long-Horizon Robotic Manipulation TasksabstractRecent advances in deep reinforcement learning (RL) have demonstrated its potential to learn complex robotic manipulation tasks. However, RL still requires the robot to collect a large amount of real-world experience. To address this problem, recent works have proposed learning from expert demonstrations (LfD), particularly via inverse reinforcement learning (IRL), given its ability to achieve robust performance with only a small number of expert demonstrations. Nevertheless, deploying IRL on real robots is still challenging due to the large number of robot experiences it requires. This paper aims to address this scalability challenge with a robust, sample-efficient, and general meta-IRL algorithm, SQUIRL, that performs a new but related long-horizon task robustly given only a single video demonstration. First, this algorithm bootstraps the learning of a task encoder and a task-conditioned policy using behavioral cloning (BC). It then collects real-robot experiences and bypasses reward learning by directly recovering a Q-function from the combined robot and expert trajectories. Next, this algorithm uses the learned Q-function to re-evaluate all cumulative experiences collected by the robot to improve the policy quickly. In the end, the policy performs more robustly (90%+ success) than BC on new tasks while requiring no experiences at test time. Finally, our real-robot and simulated experiments demonstrate our algorithm's generality across different state spaces, action spaces, and vision-based manipulation tasks, e.g., pick-pour-place and pick-carry-drop. Bohan Wu, Zhanpeng He, Abhi Gupta, Peter K. Allen |
IROS | 4 |