Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nicola Fossati

dblp:261/2390 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Emerging computing paradigms · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Compilers and program optimization · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Compilers and program optimization › approximate computing
precision tuning
0.512021
Architecture-aware Precision Tuning with Multiple Number Representation Systems · DAC 2021
Emerging computing paradigms
approximate computing
0.512021
Architecture-aware Precision Tuning with Multiple Number Representation Systems · DAC 2021
Emerging computing paradigms › approximate computing
precision tuning
0.512021
Architecture-aware Precision Tuning with Multiple Number Representation Systems · DAC 2021
Mathematical optimization
integer programming
0.112021
Architecture-aware Precision Tuning with Multiple Number Representation Systems · DAC 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

integer linear programming · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Architecture-aware Precision Tuning with Multiple Number Representation Systems
abstract
Precision tuning trades accuracy for speed and energy savings, usually by reducing the data width, or by switching from floating point to fixed point representations. However, comparing the precision across different representations is a difficult task. We present a metric that enables this comparison, and employ it to build a methodology based on Integer Linear Programming for tuning the data type selection. We apply the proposed metric and methodology to a range of processors, demonstrating an improvement in performance (up to $9 \times)$ with a very limited precision loss $(\lt 2.8$% for 90% of the benchmarks) on the PolyBench benchmark suite.
Daniele Cattaneo 0002, Michele Chiari, Nicola Fossati, Stefano Cherubin, Giovanni Agosta
DAC3