Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Carlo Maley

dblp:261/3933 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics
1.012026
Competing subclones and fitness diversity shape tumor evolution across cancer types · Bioinform. 2026
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
tumor evolution
1.012026
Competing subclones and fitness diversity shape tumor evolution across cancer types · Bioinform. 2026
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › tumor heterogeneity
intra-tumor heterogeneity
0.312026
Competing subclones and fitness diversity shape tumor evolution across cancer types · Bioinform. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

population genetics modeling · 1.0bulk sequencing analysis · 1.0cross-validation · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Competing subclones and fitness diversity shape tumor evolution across cancer types
abstract
MOTIVATION: Intratumor heterogeneity arises from ongoing somatic evolution and complicates cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Reconstructing evolutionary dynamics typically requires spatiotemporal samples, which are often unavailable in clinical settings. Computational approaches that can infer tumor evolutionary history from single-timepoint bulk sequencing data remain limited. RESULTS: We present estimating evolutionary events through single-timepoint sequencing (TEATIME), a novel computational framework that models tumors as mixtures of two competing cell populations: an ancestral clone with baseline fitness and a derived subclone with elevated fitness. Using cross-sectional bulk sequencing data, TEATIME estimates mutation rates, timing of subclone emergence, relative fitness, and number of generations of growth. To quantify intratumor fitness asymmetries, we introduce a novel metric-fitness diversity-which captures the imbalance between competing cell populations and serves as a measure of functional intratumor heterogeneity. Applying TEATIME to 33 tumor types from The Cancer Genome Atlas, we revealed divergent as well as convergent evolutionary patterns. Notably, we found that immune-hot microenvironments constraint subclonal expansion and limit fitness diversity. Moreover, we detected temporal dependencies in mutation acquisition, where early driver mutations in ancestral clones epistatically shape the fitness landscape, predisposing specific subclones to selective advantages. These findings underscore the importance of intratumor competition and tumor-microenvironment interactions in shaping evolutionary trajectories, driving intratumor heterogeneity. Lastly, we demonstrate that TEATIME-derived evolutionary parameters and fitness diversity offer novel prognostic insights across multiple cancer types. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: R implementation of TEATIME is available on GitHub (https://github.com/liliulab/TEATIME) and Zenodo (https://zenodo.org/records/17422174).
Hai Chen, Jingmin Shu, Rekha Mudappathi, Elaine Li, Panwen Wang, Leif Bergsagel, Zhifu Sun, Logan Zhao, Changxin Shi, Jeffrey P. Townsend, Carlo Maley
Bioinform.12
2020 Somatic selection distinguishes oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes
abstract
MOTIVATION: Functions of cancer driver genes vary substantially across tissues and organs. Distinguishing passenger genes, oncogenes (OGs) and tumor-suppressor genes (TSGs) for each cancer type is critical for understanding tumor biology and identifying clinically actionable targets. Although many computational tools are available to predict putative cancer driver genes, resources for context-aware classifications of OGs and TSGs are limited. RESULTS: We show that the direction and magnitude of somatic selection of protein-coding mutations are significantly different for passenger genes, OGs and TSGs. Based on these patterns, we develop a new method (genes under selection in tumors) to discover OGs and TSGs in a cancer-type specific manner. Genes under selection in tumors shows a high accuracy (92%) when evaluated via strict cross-validations. Its application to 10 172 tumor exomes found known and novel cancer drivers with high tissue-specificities. In 11 out of 13 OGs shared among multiple cancer types, we found functional domains selectively engaged in different cancers, suggesting differences in disease mechanisms. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: An R implementation of the GUST algorithm is available at https://github.com/liliulab/gust. A database with pre-computed results is available at https://liliulab.shinyapps.io/gust. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Pramod Chandrashekar, Navid Ahmadinejad, Junwen Wang, Aleksandar Sekulic, Jan B. Egan, Yan W. Asmann, Sudhir Kumar 0001, Carlo Maley, Li Liu 0035
Bioinform.8