Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Thibault Formal
dblp:262/5989
· DBLP profile ↗
14ranked-venue papers
7as first author
13since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0008-6363-9553ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 13 · 7 first-author · 12 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
6 papers |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 67% Information extraction and text analysis · 33% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › retrieval models › sparse retrieval
learned sparse retrieval |
2.6 | 4 | 2024 | Towards Effective and Efficient Sparse Neural Information Retrieval · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 2024 SPLATE: Sparse Late Interaction Retrieval · SIGIR 2024 From Distillation to Hard Negative Sampling: Making Sparse Neural IR Models More Effective · SIGIR 2022 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models
sparse retrieval |
2.5 | 4 | 2024 | SPLATE: Sparse Late Interaction Retrieval · SIGIR 2024 Benchmarking Middle-Trained Language Models for Neural Search · SIGIR 2023 From Distillation to Hard Negative Sampling: Making Sparse Neural IR Models More Effective · SIGIR 2022 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
1.9 | 3 | 2024 | Towards Effective and Efficient Sparse Neural Information Retrieval · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 2024 Benchmarking Middle-Trained Language Models for Neural Search · SIGIR 2023 Composite Code Sparse Autoencoders for First Stage Retrieval · SIGIR 2021 |
Information retrieval
evaluation |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Towards Effective and Efficient Sparse Neural Information Retrieval · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 2024 Benchmarking Middle-Trained Language Models for Neural Search · SIGIR 2023 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models
neural retrieval |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | SPLATE: Sparse Late Interaction Retrieval · SIGIR 2024 From Distillation to Hard Negative Sampling: Making Sparse Neural IR Models More Effective · SIGIR 2022 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models › sparse retrieval
sparse neural retrieval |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | Towards Effective and Efficient Sparse Neural Information Retrieval · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 2024 Composite Code Sparse Autoencoders for First Stage Retrieval · SIGIR 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
context pruning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Provence: efficient and robust context pruning for retrieval-augmented generation · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Provence: efficient and robust context pruning for retrieval-augmented generation · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sequence labeling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Provence: efficient and robust context pruning for retrieval-augmented generation · ICLR 2025 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
late interaction retrieval |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SPLATE: Sparse Late Interaction Retrieval · SIGIR 2024 |
Information retrieval › query reformulation
query expansion |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Effective and Efficient Sparse Neural Information Retrieval · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 2024 |
Information retrieval
sparse feature learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Effective and Efficient Sparse Neural Information Retrieval · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 2024 |
Information retrieval › evaluation
benchmark |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Benchmarking Middle-Trained Language Models for Neural Search · SIGIR 2023 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
dense retrieval |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Benchmarking Middle-Trained Language Models for Neural Search · SIGIR 2023 |
Information retrieval › search engines
neural search |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Benchmarking Middle-Trained Language Models for Neural Search · SIGIR 2023 |
Information retrieval › similarity search › nearest neighbor search
approximate nearest neighbor search |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Composite Code Sparse Autoencoders for First Stage Retrieval · SIGIR 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
knowledge distillation · 2.1hard negative mining · 1.3sequence labeling · 0.9reranking · 0.9pre-trained language model · 0.8MLM adapter · 0.8masked language modeling · 0.7fine-tuning · 0.7pre-trained language model initialization · 0.6sparsity regularization · 0.5product quantization · 0.5log-saturation · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | XProvence: Zero-Cost Multilingual Context Pruning for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Youssef Mohamed, Mohamed Elhoseiny 0001, Thibault Formal, Nadezhda Chirkova |
ECIR (2) | 3 |
| 2025 | Provence: efficient and robust context pruning for retrieval-augmented generationabstractRetrieval-Augmented Generation improves various aspects of large language models (LLMs) generation, but suffers from computational overhead caused by long contexts, and the propagation of irrelevant retrieved information into generated responses. Context pruning deals with both aspects, by removing irrelevant parts of retrieved contexts before LLM generation. Existing context pruning approaches are limited, and do not present a universal model that would be both _efficient_ and _robust_ in a wide range of scenarios, e.g., when contexts contain a variable amount of relevant information or vary in length, or when evaluated on various domains. In this work, we close this gap and introduce Provence (Pruning and Reranking Of retrieVEd relevaNt ContExts), an efficient and robust context pruner for Question Answering, which dynamically detects the needed amount of pruning for a given context and can be used out-of-the-box for various domains. The three key ingredients of Provence are formulating the context pruning task as sequence labeling, unifying context pruning capabilities with context reranking, and training on diverse data. Our experimental results show that Provence enables context pruning with negligible to no drop in performance, in various domains and settings, at almost no cost in a standard RAG pipeline. We also conduct a deeper analysis alongside various ablations to provide insights into training context pruners for future work. Nadezhda Chirkova, Thibault Formal, Vassilina Nikoulina, Stéphane Clinchant |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2024 | SPLATE: Sparse Late Interaction RetrievalabstractThe late interaction paradigm introduced with ColBERT stands out in the neural Information Retrieval space, offering a compelling effectiveness-efficiency trade-off across many benchmarks. Efficient late interaction retrieval is based on an optimized multi-step strategy, where an approximate search first identifies a set of candidate documents to re-rank exactly. In this work, we introduce SPLATE, a simple and lightweight adaptation of the ColBERTv2 model which learns an "MLM adapter'', mapping its frozen token embeddings to a sparse vocabulary space with a partially learned SPLADE module. This allows us to perform the candidate generation step in late interaction pipelines with traditional sparse retrieval techniques, making it particularly appealing for running ColBERT in CPU environments. Our SPLATE ColBERTv2 pipeline achieves the same effectiveness as the PLAID ColBERTv2 engine by re-ranking 50 documents that can be retrieved under 10ms. Thibault Formal, Stéphane Clinchant, Hervé Déjean, Carlos Eduardo Rosar Kós Lassance |
SIGIR | 1 |
| 2024 | Towards Effective and Efficient Sparse Neural Information RetrievalabstractSparse representation learning based on Pre-trained Language Models has seen a growing interest in Information Retrieval. Such approaches can take advantage of the proven efficiency of inverted indexes and inherit desirable IR priors such as explicit lexical matching or some degree of interpretability. In this work, we thoroughly develop the framework of sparse representation learning in IR, which unifies term weighting and expansion in a supervised setting. We then build on SPLADE—a sparse expansion-based retriever—and show to which extent it is able to benefit from the same training improvements as dense bi-encoders by studying the effect of distillation, hard negative mining, as well as the Pre-trained Language Model’s initialization on itseffectiveness, leading to state-of-the-art results in both in- and out-of-domain evaluation settings (SPLADE++). We furthermore proposeefficiencyimprovements, allowing us to reach latency requirements on par with traditional keyword-based approaches (Efficient-SPLADE). Thibault Formal, Carlos Eduardo Rosar Kós Lassance, Benjamin Piwowarski, Stéphane Clinchant |
ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. | 1 |
| 2023 | Query Performance Prediction for Neural IR: Are We There Yet?
Guglielmo Faggioli, Thibault Formal, Stefano Marchesin 0001, Stéphane Clinchant, Nicola Ferro 0001, Benjamin Piwowarski |
ECIR (1) | 2 |
| 2023 | CoSPLADE: Contextualizing SPLADE for Conversational Information Retrieval
Thomas Gerald, Thibault Formal, Jian-Yun Nie, Benjamin Piwowarski, Laure Soulier |
ECIR (1) | 3 |
| 2023 | MS-Shift: An Analysis of MS MARCO Distribution Shifts on Neural Retrieval
Simon Lupart, Thibault Formal, Stéphane Clinchant |
ECIR (1) | 2 |
| 2023 | Benchmarking Middle-Trained Language Models for Neural SearchabstractMiddle training methods aim to bridge the gap between the Masked Language Model (MLM) pre-training and the final finetuning for retrieval. Recent models such as CoCondenser, RetroMAE, and LexMAE argue that the MLM task is not sufficient enough to pre-train a transformer network for retrieval and hence propose various tasks to do so. Intrigued by those novel methods, we noticed that all these models used different finetuning protocols, making it hard to assess the benefits of middle training. We propose in this paper a benchmark of CoCondenser, RetroMAE, and LexMAE, under the same finetuning conditions. We compare both dense and sparse approaches under various finetuning protocols and middle training on different collections (MS MARCO, Wikipedia). We use additional middle training baselines, such as a standard MLM finetuning on the retrieval collection, optionally augmented by a CLS predicting the passage term frequency. For the sparse approach, our study reveals that there is almost no statistical difference between those methods: the more effective the finetuning procedure is, the less difference there is between those models. For the dense approach, RetroMAE using MS MARCO as middle-training collection shows excellent results in almost all the settings. Finally, we show that middle training on the retrieval collection, thus adapting the language model to it, is a critical factor. Overall, a better experimental setup should be adopted to evaluate middle training methods. Hervé Déjean, Stéphane Clinchant, Carlos Eduardo Rosar Kós Lassance, Simon Lupart, Thibault Formal |
SIGIR | 5 |
| 2022 | Match Your Words! A Study of Lexical Matching in Neural Information Retrieval
Thibault Formal, Benjamin Piwowarski, Stéphane Clinchant |
ECIR (2) | 1 |
| 2022 | From Distillation to Hard Negative Sampling: Making Sparse Neural IR Models More EffectiveabstractNeural retrievers based on dense representations combined with Approximate Nearest Neighbors search have recently received a lot of attention, owing their success to distillation and/or better sampling of examples for training -- while still relying on the same backbone architecture. In the meantime, sparse representation learning fueled by traditional inverted indexing techniques has seen a growing interest, inheriting from desirable IR priors such as explicit lexical matching. While some architectural variants have been proposed, a lesser effort has been put in the training of such models. In this work, we build on SPLADE -- a sparse expansion-based retriever -- and show to which extent it is able to benefit from the same training improvements as dense models, by studying the effect of distillation, hard-negative mining as well as the Pre-trained Language Model initialization. We furthermore study the link between effectiveness and efficiency, on in-domain and zero-shot settings, leading to state-of-the-art results in both scenarios for sufficiently expressive models. Thibault Formal, Carlos Eduardo Rosar Kós Lassance, Benjamin Piwowarski, Stéphane Clinchant |
SIGIR | 1 |
| 2021 | A White Box Analysis of ColBERT
Thibault Formal, Benjamin Piwowarski, Stéphane Clinchant |
ECIR (2) | 1 |
| 2021 | SPLADE: Sparse Lexical and Expansion Model for First Stage RankingabstractIn neural Information Retrieval, ongoing research is directed towards improving the first retriever in ranking pipelines. Learning dense embeddings to conduct retrieval using efficient approximate nearest neighbors methods has proven to work well. Meanwhile, there has been a growing interest in learning sparse representations for documents and queries, that could inherit from the desirable properties of bag-of-words models such as the exact matching of terms and the efficiency of inverted indexes. In this work, we present a new first-stage ranker based on explicit sparsity regularization and a log-saturation effect on term weights, leading to highly sparse representations and competitive results with respect to state-of-the-art dense and sparse methods. Our approach is simple, trained end-to-end in a single stage. We also explore the trade-off between effectiveness and efficiency, by controlling the contribution of the sparsity regularization. Thibault Formal, Benjamin Piwowarski, Stéphane Clinchant |
SIGIR | 1 |
| 2021 | Composite Code Sparse Autoencoders for First Stage RetrievalabstractWe present a Composite Code Sparse Autoencoder (CCSA) approach for Approximate Nearest Neighbor (ANN) search of document representations based on Siamese-BERT models. In Information Retrieval (IR), the ranking pipeline is generally decomposed in two stages: the first stage focuses on retrieving a candidate set from the whole collection. The second stage re-ranks the candidates by relying on more complex models. Recently, Siamese-BERT models have been used as first stage rankers to replace or complement the traditional bag-of-words models. However, indexing and searching a large document collection requires efficient similarity search on dense vectors and this is why ANN techniques come into play. Since composite codes are naturally sparse, we show how CCSA can learn efficient parallel inverted index thanks to an uniformity regularizer. Our experiments on MS MARCO reveal that for the same quantization budget and [email protected] targets, CCSA is able to outperform IVF (inverted-index file) with product quantization on both Carlos Eduardo Rosar Kós Lassance, Thibault Formal, Stéphane Clinchant |
SIGIR | 2 |
| 2020 | Learning to Rank Images with Cross-Modal Graph Convolutions
Thibault Formal, Stéphane Clinchant, Jean-Michel Renders, Sooyeol Lee, Geun-Hee Cho |
ECIR (1) | 1 |