Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pansilu Pitigalaarachchi

dblp:263/9673 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0008-9991-3390ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
3 papers
Program analysis · 70% Operating systems · 30%
Network and information security
3 papers
Hardware security and side channels · 60% Systems and software security · 40%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program analysis
symbolic execution
2.332025
A System Framework to Symbolically Explore Intel TDX Module Execution · CCS 2025
Symbolic Execution for Dynamic Kernel Analysis · CCS 2024
KRover: A Symbolic Execution Engine for Dynamic Kernel Analysis · CCS 2023
Systems and software security
vulnerability discovery
1.132025
KRover: A Symbolic Execution Engine for Dynamic Kernel Analysis · CCS 2023
A System Framework to Symbolically Explore Intel TDX Module Execution · CCS 2025
Symbolic Execution for Dynamic Kernel Analysis · CCS 2024
Operating systems › system security › operating system security
kernel security
1.022024
Symbolic Execution for Dynamic Kernel Analysis · CCS 2024
KRover: A Symbolic Execution Engine for Dynamic Kernel Analysis · CCS 2023
Hardware security and side channels › trusted execution environments
Intel TDX
0.912025
A System Framework to Symbolically Explore Intel TDX Module Execution · CCS 2025
Hardware security and side channels
trusted execution environments
0.912025
A System Framework to Symbolically Explore Intel TDX Module Execution · CCS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

symbolic execution · 4.6dynamic analysis · 3.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 A System Framework to Symbolically Explore Intel TDX Module Execution
abstract
We present TDXplorer, the first dynamic symbolic analysis system for Intel's TDX Module, the software trusted computing base of TDX. Without using TDX hardware, an analyzer function on top of TDXplorer can not only apply dynamic analysis to control and instrument the TDX Module's execution, but also carry out symbolic execution for path exploration as well as security and functionality reasoning. The two types of analysis are seamlessly integrated in a way that symbolic execution is conducted directly upon the TDX Module's binary code and runtime states, which are shaped by using dynamic analysis techniques. We implement TDXplorer on Linux and measure its performance and correctness against executions on a TDX platform. Our case studies on symbolic modeling of secure EPT creation and KeyHole region management demonstrate that TDXplorer is a versatile and capable tool supporting various analysis tasks.
Pansilu Pitigalaarachchi, Xuhua Ding
CCS1
2024 Symbolic Execution for Dynamic Kernel Analysis
abstract
Linux kernel-based operating systems have a significant market share in the domains of enterprise/web servers, supercomputers, and mobile devices. Being a large open-source project, the Linux kernel undergoes many changes, with new functionalities (e.g. Support for Rust in the kernel) being added in each release. While the security analysis of the Linux kernel is of critical importance, it is a challenging task. Although symbolic execution based techniques have been used for kernel analysis in the past decade, existing tools have fundamental limitations in kernel thread analysis, such as the need for instrumentation of the target kernel and the lack of user control, command, and access to the target execution. This dissertation aims to address these limitations by proposing a new kernel symbolic execution engine for kernel thread analysis. We then intend to leverage the new engine to conduct a security analysis of Rust drivers written for the Linux kernel. As part of the analysis, we will perform symbolic execution on Rust drivers, detect bugs, and evaluate whether the integration of Rust drivers with the rest of the kernel, written in C, results in any security vulnerabilities.
Pansilu Pitigalaarachchi
CCS1
2023 KRover: A Symbolic Execution Engine for Dynamic Kernel Analysis
abstract
We present KRover, a novel kernel symbolic execution engine catered for dynamic kernel analysis such as vulnerability analysis and exploit generation. Different from existing symbolic execution engines, KRover operates directly upon a live kernel thread's virtual memory and weaves symbolic execution into the target's native executions. KRover is compact as it neither lifts the target binary to an intermediary representation nor uses QEMU or dynamic binary translation. Benchmarked against S2E, our performance experiments show that KRover is up to 50 times faster but with one tenth to one quarter of S2E memory cost. As shown in our four case studies, KRover is noise free, has the best-possible binary intimacy and does not require prior kernel instrumentation. Moreover, a user can develop her kernel analyzer that not only uses KRover as a symbolic execution library but also preserves its independent capabilities of reading/writing/controlling the target runtime. Namely, the resulting analyzer on top of KRover integrates symbolic reasoning and conventional dynamic analysis and reaps the benefits of their reinforcement to each other.
Pansilu Pitigalaarachchi, Xuhua Ding, Haiqing Qiu, Haoxin Tu, Jiaqi Hong, Lingxiao Jiang
CCS1