Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniel Jarne Ornia
dblp:264/3708
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-5949-8761ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 41% Multi-agent systems · 22% Reinforcement learning · 14% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment
agent alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Emergent Risk Awareness in Rational Agents under Resource Constraints · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
bandit |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Emergent Risk Awareness in Rational Agents under Resource Constraints · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning Likelihood-Free Reference Priors · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › approximate bayesian inference
simulation-based inference |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning Likelihood-Free Reference Priors · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning Likelihood-Free Reference Priors · ICML 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › swarm robotics
collective foraging |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Mean Field Behavior of Collaborative Multiagent Foragers · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory › statistical physics of learning
mean-field analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Mean Field Behavior of Collaborative Multiagent Foragers · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2022 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
multi-agent collaboration |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Mean Field Behavior of Collaborative Multiagent Foragers · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2022 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
human-agent interaction |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Emergent Risk Awareness in Rational Agents under Resource Constraints · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational approximation · 0.9utility theory · 0.9simulation-based inference · 0.9sequential decision making · 0.9mutual information estimation · 0.9mean field techniques · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Learning Likelihood-Free Reference PriorsabstractSimulation modeling offers a flexible approach to constructing high-fidelity synthetic representations of complex real-world systems. However, the increased complexity of such models introduces additional complications, for example when carrying out statistical inference procedures. This has motivated a large and growing literature on likelihood-free or simulation-based inference methods, which approximate (e.g., Bayesian) inference without assuming access to the simulator’s intractable likelihood function. A hitherto neglected problem in the simulation-based Bayesian inference literature is the challenge of constructing minimally informative reference priors for complex simulation models. Such priors maximise an expected Kullback-Leibler distance from the prior to the posterior, thereby influencing posterior inferences minimally and enabling an “objective” approach to Bayesian inference that does not necessitate the incorporation of strong subjective prior beliefs. In this paper, we propose and test a selection of likelihood-free methods for learning reference priors for simulation models, using variational approximations to these priors and a variety of mutual information estimators. Our experiments demonstrate that good approximations to reference priors for simulation models are in this way attainable, providing a first step towards the development of likelihood-free objective Bayesian inference procedures. Nicholas Bishop, Daniel Jarne Ornia, Joel Dyer, Ani Calinescu, Michael J. Wooldridge |
ICML | 2 |
| 2025 | Predictability Awareness for Efficient and Robust Multi-Agent Coordination
Roman Chiva Gil, Daniel Jarne Ornia, Khaled A. Mustafa, Javier Alonso-Mora |
AAMAS | 2 |
| 2025 | Emergent Risk Awareness in Rational Agents under Resource ConstraintsabstractAdvanced reasoning models with agentic capabilities (AI agents) are deployed to interact with humans and to solve sequential decision‑making problems under (often approximate) utility functions and internal models. When such problems have resource or failure constraints where action sequences may be forcibly terminated once resources are exhausted, agents face implicit trade‑offs that reshape their utility-driven (rational) behaviour. Additionally, since these agents are typically commissioned by a human principal to act on their behalf, asymmetries in constraint exposure can give rise to previously unanticipated misalignment between human objectives and agent incentives. We formalise this setting through a survival bandit framework, provide theoretical and empirical results that quantify the impact of survival‑driven preference shifts, identify conditions under which misalignment emerges and propose mechanisms to mitigate the emergence of risk-seeking or risk-averse behaviours. As a result, this work aims to increase understanding and interpretability of emergent behaviours of AI agents operating under such survival pressure, and offer guidelines for safely deploying such AI systems in critical resource‑limited environments. Daniel Jarne Ornia, Nicholas Bishop, Joel Dyer, Ani Calinescu, J. Doyne Farmer, Michael J. Wooldridge |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | Mean Field Behavior of Collaborative Multiagent ForagersabstractCollaborative multiagent robotic systems, where agents coordinate by modifying a shared environment often result in undesired dynamical couplings that complicate the analysis and experiments when solving a specific problem or task. Simultaneously, biologically inspired robotics rely on simplifying agents and increasing their number to obtain more efficient solutions to such problems, drawing similarities with natural processes. In this work, we focus on the problem of a biologically inspired multiagent system solving collaborative foraging. We show how mean field techniques can be used to re-formulate such a stochastic multiagent problem into a deterministic autonomous system. This de-couples agent dynamics, enabling the computation of limit behaviors and the analysis of optimality guarantees. Furthermore, we analyse how having finite number of agents affects the performance when compared to the mean field limit and we discuss the implications of such limit approximations in this multiagent system, which have impact on more general collaborative stochastic problems. Daniel Jarne Ornia, Pedro J. Zufiria, Manuel Mazo 0002 |
IEEE Trans. Robotics | 1 |
| 2020 | Convergence of ant colony multi-agent swarmsabstractAnt Colony algorithms are a set of biologically inspired algorithms used commonly to solve distributed optimization problems. Convergence has been proven in the context of optimization processes, but these proofs are not applicable in the framework of robotic control. In order to use Ant Colony algorithms to control robotic swarms, we present in this work more general results that prove asymptotic convergence of a multi-agent Ant Colony swarm moving in a weighted graph. Daniel Jarne Ornia, Manuel Mazo 0002 |
HSCC | 1 |