Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lauren Cassidy

dblp:266/0825 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
dependency parsing
0.612022
TwittIrish: A Universal Dependencies Treebank of Tweets in Modern Irish · ACL (1) 2022
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › data annotation › corpus annotation
treebank construction
0.612022
TwittIrish: A Universal Dependencies Treebank of Tweets in Modern Irish · ACL (1) 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

bootstrapping · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 TwittIrish: A Universal Dependencies Treebank of Tweets in Modern Irish
abstract
Modern Irish is a minority language lacking sufficient computational resources for the task of accurate automatic syntactic parsing of usergenerated content such as tweets.Although language technology for the Irish language has been developing in recent years, these tools tend to perform poorly on user-generated content.As with other languages, the linguistic style observed in Irish tweets differs, in terms of orthography, lexicon, and syntax, from that of standard texts more commonly used for the development of language models and parsers.We release the first Universal Dependencies treebank of Irish tweets, facilitating natural language processing of user-generated content in Irish.In this paper, we explore the differences between Irish tweets and standard Irish text, and the challenges associated with dependency parsing of Irish tweets.We describe our bootstrapping method of treebank development and report on preliminary parsing experiments.
Lauren Cassidy, Teresa Lynn, James Barry, Jennifer Foster
ACL (1)1
2022 gaBERT - an Irish Language Model
abstract
The BERT family of neural language models have become highly popular due to their ability to provide sequences of text with rich context-sensitive token encodings which are able to generalise well to many NLP tasks. We introduce gaBERT, a monolingual BERT model for the Irish language. We compare our gaBERT model to multilingual BERT and the monolingual Irish WikiBERT, and we show that gaBERT provides better representations for a downstream parsing task. We also show how different filtering criteria, vocabulary size and the choice of subword tokenisation model affect downstream performance. We compare the results of fine-tuning a gaBERT model with an mBERT model for the task of identifying verbal multiword expressions, and show that the fine-tuned gaBERT model also performs better at this task. We release gaBERT and related code to the community.
James Barry, Joachim Wagner 0001, Lauren Cassidy, Alan Cowap, Teresa Lynn, Abigail Walsh, Mícheál J. Ó Meachair, Jennifer Foster
LREC3
2020 Treebanking User-Generated Content: A Proposal for a Unified Representation in Universal Dependencies
abstract
The paper presents a discussion on the main linguistic phenomena of user-generated texts found in web and social media, and proposes a set of annotation guidelines for their treatment within the Universal Dependencies (UD) framework. Given on the one hand the increasing number of treebanks featuring user-generated content, and its somewhat inconsistent treatment in these resources on the other, the aim of this paper is twofold: (1) to provide a short, though comprehensive, overview of such treebanks - based on available literature - along with their main features and a comparative analysis of their annotation criteria, and (2) to propose a set of tentative UD-based annotation guidelines, to promote consistent treatment of the particular phenomena found in these types of texts. The main goal of this paper is to provide a common framework for those teams interested in developing similar resources in UD, thus enabling cross-linguistic consistency, which is a principle that has always been in the spirit of UD.
Manuela Sanguinetti, Cristina Bosco, Lauren Cassidy, Özlem Çetinoglu, Alessandra Teresa Cignarella, Teresa Lynn, Ines Rehbein, Josef Ruppenhofer, Djamé Seddah, Amir Zeldes
LREC3