Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ofir Landau
dblp:266/8097
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Improving Generalization Capabilities of Models Trained on Time Series Data Using Novel Downsampling Methods · ICDM 2025 |
Machine learning and data management
time series learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Improving Generalization Capabilities of Models Trained on Time Series Data Using Novel Downsampling Methods · ICDM 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
evaluation metrics · 1.7downsampling · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Improving Generalization Capabilities of Models Trained on Time Series Data Using Novel Downsampling MethodsabstractLearning from time series data, particularly univariate time series data (UTSD), is important in various fields. Learning accurately from UTSD is challenging, since the data may be very granular and noisy and thus may contain time points which do not necessarily contribute to, and may even prevent, the ability to attain high generalization capabilities. Downsampling, in which a pared down version of the original UTSD that contains its most valuable parts is preserved, is commonly performed to cope with highly granular or noisy UTSD. However, there is a lack of effective downsampling methods, along with the appropriate evaluation metrics for them. We propose four new UTSD downsampling methods and evaluate their performance on nine commonly used and publicly available datasets. To enable proper evaluation of the downsampling methods, we have proposed three new evaluation metrics. Our evaluation demonstrates that our downsampling methods outperform state-of-the-art (SOT A) methods in two aspects: (1) our methods better preserve the original UTSD; and (2) more importantly, downsampled UTSD provided by our methods allow machine learning (ML) models to attain higher generalization capabilities compared to UTSD that SOTA downsampled. Particularly, our methods obtained better results in almost all the examined datasets (nearly 90%) in comparison to SOTA. Ofir Landau, Nir Nissim |
ICDM | 1 |
| 2025 | Mining multi-electrode and multi-wave electroencephalogram based time-interval temporal patterns for improved classification capabilities and explainability
Ofir Landau, Nir Nissim |
Artif. Intell. Medicine | 1 |
| 2020 | Mind your privacy: Privacy leakage through BCI applications using machine learning methods
Ofir Landau, Aviad Cohen 0002, Shirley Gordon, Nir Nissim |
Knowl. Based Syst. | 1 |