Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sixu Hu
dblp:267/5514
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-5048-3707ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Practical Hybrid Gradient Compression for Federated Learning Systems · IJCAI 2024 A Survey on Federated Learning Systems: Vision, Hype and Reality for Data Privacy and Protection · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
gradient compression |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Practical Hybrid Gradient Compression for Federated Learning Systems · IJCAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
federated learning systems |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Survey on Federated Learning Systems: Vision, Hype and Reality for Data Privacy and Protection · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023 |
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving machine learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | A Survey on Federated Learning Systems: Vision, Hype and Reality for Data Privacy and Protection · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
survey · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Practical Hybrid Gradient Compression for Federated Learning Systems
Sixu Hu, Linshan Jiang, Bingsheng He |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2023 | Communication-Efficient Generalized Neuron Matching for Federated LearningabstractFederated Learning (FL) is a popular distributed machine learning paradigm that allows multiple participants to collaboratively train a model without sharing the raw data. In each round of FL, all participants train local models in parallel, and a server aggregates the local models to create the global model. Neuron matching is a promising aggregation method that utilizes permutational invariance to improve the quality of the global model and reduces communication costs. However, existing neural matching approaches have two strict limitations: 1) They are only applicable to models with simple sequential networks and cannot support advanced models such as ResNet. 2) Their approaches significantly increase the model size after matching, which causes massive memory and communication costs as the training proceeds. In this paper, we propose a novel neuron matching algorithm called federated generalized matched averaging (FedGMA) to mitigate these limitations. Our experiments show that the proposed method is applicable to complex network structures such as ResNet and InceptionNet, and achieves accuracy comparable to algorithms that directly average the entire model. It also reduces communication costs and demonstrates robustness in data heterogeneity scenarios. Sixu Hu, Qinbin Li, Bingsheng He |
ICPP | 1 |
| 2023 | A Survey on Federated Learning Systems: Vision, Hype and Reality for Data Privacy and ProtectionabstractAs data privacy increasingly becomes a critical societal concern, federated learning has been a hot research topic in enabling the collaborative training of machine learning models among different organizations under the privacy restrictions. As researchers try to support more machine learning models with different privacy-preserving approaches, there is a requirement in developing systems and infrastructures to ease the development of various federated learning algorithms. Similar to deep learning systems such as PyTorch and TensorFlow that boost the development of deep learning, federated learning systems (FLSs) are equivalently important, and face challenges from various aspects such as effectiveness, efficiency, and privacy. In this survey, we conduct a comprehensive review on federated learning systems. To understand the key design system components and guide future research, we introduce the definition of federated learning systems and analyze the system components. Moreover, we provide a thorough categorization for federated learning systems according to six different aspects, including data distribution, machine learning model, privacy mechanism, communication architecture, scale of federation and motivation of federation. The categorization can help the design of federated learning systems as shown in our case studies. By systematically summarizing the existing federated learning systems, we present the design factors, case studies, and future research opportunities. Qinbin Li, Zeyi Wen, Zhaomin Wu, Sixu Hu, Naibo Wang, Yuan Li 0032, Xu Liu 0014, Bingsheng He |
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. | 4 |
| 2022 | The OARF Benchmark Suite: Characterization and Implications for Federated Learning SystemsabstractThis article presents and characterizes an Open Application Repository for Federated Learning (OARF), a benchmark suite for federated machine learning systems. Previously available benchmarks for federated learning (FL) have focused mainly on synthetic datasets and use a limited number of applications. OARF mimics more realistic application scenarios with publicly available datasets as different data silos in image, text, and structured data. Our characterization shows that the benchmark suite is diverse in data size, distribution, feature distribution, and learning task complexity. The extensive evaluations with reference implementations show the future research opportunities for important aspects of FL systems. We have developed reference implementations, and evaluated the important aspects of FL, including model accuracy, communication cost, throughput, and convergence time. Through these evaluations, we discovered some interesting findings such as FL can effectively increase end-to-end throughput. The code of OARF is publicly available on GitHub. 1 Sixu Hu, Yuan Li 0032, Xu Liu 0014, Qinbin Li, Zhaomin Wu, Bingsheng He |
ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. | 1 |