Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Siddharth Nayak

dblp:268/7851 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 49% Multi-agent systems · 29% Reinforcement learning · 15%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
decentralized planning
0.812024
Long-Horizon Planning for Multi-Agent Robots in Partially Observable Environments · NeurIPS 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning › language-based planning
language-model-based planning
0.812024
Long-Horizon Planning for Multi-Agent Robots in Partially Observable Environments · NeurIPS 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
multi-agent planning
0.812024
Long-Horizon Planning for Multi-Agent Robots in Partially Observable Environments · NeurIPS 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › multi-agent path finding
distributed path planning
0.712023
Scalable Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning through Intelligent Information Aggregation · ICML 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › multi-agent control
multi-agent navigation
0.712023
Scalable Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning through Intelligent Information Aggregation · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning
0.712023
Scalable Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning through Intelligent Information Aggregation · ICML 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
scheduling
0.612022
NICE: Robust Scheduling through Reinforcement Learning-Guided Integer Programming · AAAI 2022
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization
0.612022
NICE: Robust Scheduling through Reinforcement Learning-Guided Integer Programming · AAAI 2022
Mathematical optimization
integer programming
0.612022
NICE: Robust Scheduling through Reinforcement Learning-Guided Integer Programming · AAAI 2022
Mathematical optimization › scheduling › scheduling under uncertainty
robust scheduling
0.612022
NICE: Robust Scheduling through Reinforcement Learning-Guided Integer Programming · AAAI 2022
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.212023
Scalable Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning through Intelligent Information Aggregation · ICML 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › social choice › computational social choice
information aggregation
0.212023
Scalable Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning through Intelligent Information Aggregation · ICML 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 1.1integer programming · 1.1plan-act-correct-verify · 0.8large language model · 0.8graph neural network · 0.7actor-critic · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Asynchronous Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Limited Communication
Sydney Dolan, Siddharth Nayak, Jasmine Jerry Aloor, Hamsa Balakrishnan
AAMAS2
2024 Kanva: A Lock-free Learned Search Data Structure
abstract
Lock-free concurrent data structures offer throughput with scalability and guarantees for the completion of operations on multicore computers. Recently, queries using machine learning models trained to predict the data distribution have gained remarkable attention. Yet, to our knowledge, no existing lock-free data structure employs them. This paper introduces a lock-free search structure that supports concurrent updates, membership, and range queries accelerated by a shallow hierarchy of lightweight machine learning models. The proposed approach significantly outperforms the current state-of-the-art lock-free data structures in many workload and data distribution settings. Ours is the first provably linearizable learned lock-free concurrent range search index.
Gaurav Bhardwaj, Bapi Chatterjee, Sathya Peri, Siddharth Nayak
ICPP5
2024 Long-Horizon Planning for Multi-Agent Robots in Partially Observable Environments
abstract
The ability of Language Models (LMs) to understand natural language makes them a powerful tool for parsing human instructions into task plans for autonomous robots. Unlike traditional planning methods that rely on domain-specific knowledge and handcrafted rules, LMs generalize from diverse data and adapt to various tasks with minimal tuning, acting as a compressed knowledge base. However, LMs in their standard form face challenges with long-horizon tasks, particularly in partially observable multi-agent settings. We propose an LM-based Long-Horizon Planner for Multi-Agent Robotics (LLaMAR), a cognitive architecture for planning that achieves state-of-the-art results in long-horizon tasks within partially observable environments. LLaMAR employs a plan-act-correct-verify framework, allowing self-correction from action execution feedback without relying on oracles or simulators. Additionally, we present MAP-THOR, a comprehensive test suite encompassing household tasks of varying complexity within the AI2-THOR environment. Experiments show that LLaMAR achieves a 30\% higher success rate than other state-of-the-art LM-based multi-agent planners in MAP-THOR and Search \& Rescue tasks. Code can be found at [https://github.com/nsidn98/LLaMAR](https://github.com/nsidn98/LLaMAR)
Siddharth Nayak, Adelmo Morrison Orozco, Marina Ten Have, Jackson Zhang, Vittal Thirumalai, Darren Chen, Aditya Kapoor, Eric Robinson, Karthik Gopalakrishnan 0002, James Harrison, Anuj Mahajan, Brian Ichter, Hamsa Balakrishnan
NeurIPS1
2024 Brief Announcement: Lock-free Learned Search Data Structure
abstract
This paper introduces a lock-free linearizable search structure that supports concurrent updates, membership, and range queries accelerated by a shallow hierarchy of lightweight machine learning (ML) models. The proposed approach significantly outperforms the current state-of-the-art lock-free data structures in many workload and data distribution settings.
Gaurav Bhardwaj, Bapi Chatterjee, Sathya Peri, Siddharth Nayak
SPAA5
2023 Scalable Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning through Intelligent Information Aggregation
abstract
We consider the problem of multi-agent navigation and collision avoidance when observations are limited to the local neighborhood of each agent. We propose InforMARL, a novel architecture for multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) which uses local information intelligently to compute paths for all the agents in a decentralized manner. Specifically, InforMARL aggregates information about the local neighborhood of agents for both the actor and the critic using a graph neural network and can be used in conjunction with any standard MARL algorithm. We show that (1) in training, InforMARL has better sample efficiency and performance than baseline approaches, despite using less information, and (2) in testing, it scales well to environments with arbitrary numbers of agents and obstacles. We illustrate these results using four task environments, including one with predetermined goals for each agent, and one in which the agents collectively try to cover all goals.
Siddharth Nayak, Kenneth Choi, Wenqi Ding, Sydney Dolan, Karthik Gopalakrishnan 0002, Hamsa Balakrishnan
ICML1
2022 NICE: Robust Scheduling through Reinforcement Learning-Guided Integer Programming
abstract
Integer programs provide a powerful abstraction for representing a wide range of real-world scheduling problems. Despite their ability to model general scheduling problems, solving large-scale integer programs (IP) remains a computational challenge in practice. The incorporation of more complex objectives such as robustness to disruptions further exacerbates the computational challenge. We present NICE (Neural network IP Coefficient Extraction), a novel technique that combines reinforcement learning and integer programming to tackle the problem of robust scheduling. More specifically, NICE uses reinforcement learning to approximately represent complex objectives in an integer programming formulation. We use NICE to determine assignments of pilots to a flight crew schedule so as to reduce the impact of disruptions. We compare NICE with (1) a baseline integer programming formulation that produces a feasible crew schedule, and (2) a robust integer programming formulation that explicitly tries to minimize the impact of disruptions. Our experiments show that, across a variety of scenarios, NICE produces schedules resulting in 33% to 48% fewer disruptions than the baseline formulation. Moreover, in more severely constrained scheduling scenarios in which the robust integer program fails to produce a schedule within 90 minutes, NICE is able to build robust schedules in less than 2 seconds on average.
Luke Kenworthy, Siddharth Nayak, Christopher Chin, Hamsa Balakrishnan
AAAI2