Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lasse Dissing
dblp:269/4623
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 72% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 15% Multi-agent systems · 13% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-robot interaction · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
epistemic reasoning |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | DEL-based Epistemic Planning for Human-Robot Collaboration: Theory and Implementation · KR 2021 Implementing Theory of Mind on a Robot Using Dynamic Epistemic Logic · IJCAI 2020 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
epistemic planning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | DEL-based Epistemic Planning for Human-Robot Collaboration: Theory and Implementation · KR 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
cognitive robotics |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Implementing Theory of Mind on a Robot Using Dynamic Epistemic Logic · IJCAI 2020 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › logic in computer science › logical foundations › non-classical logics › epistemic logic
dynamic epistemic logic |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Implementing Theory of Mind on a Robot Using Dynamic Epistemic Logic · IJCAI 2020 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › social intelligence
perspective taking |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Implementing Theory of Mind on a Robot Using Dynamic Epistemic Logic · IJCAI 2020 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
theory of mind |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Implementing Theory of Mind on a Robot Using Dynamic Epistemic Logic · IJCAI 2020 |
Human-robot interaction
human-robot collaboration |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | DEL-based Epistemic Planning for Human-Robot Collaboration: Theory and Implementation · KR 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › neuro-symbolic reasoning
symbol grounding |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Implementing Theory of Mind on a Robot Using Dynamic Epistemic Logic · IJCAI 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
partition refinement · 1.0bisimulation · 1.0perception system · 0.4deep neural network · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | DEL-based Epistemic Planning for Human-Robot Collaboration: Theory and ImplementationabstractEpistemic planning based on Dynamic Epistemic Logic (DEL) allows agents to reason and plan from the perspective of other agents. The framework of DEL-based epistemic planning thereby has the potential to represent significant aspects of Theory of Mind in autonomous robots, and to provide a foundation for human-robot collaboration in which coordination is achieved implicitly through perspective shifts. In this paper, we build on previous work in epistemic planning with implicit coordination. We introduce a new notion of indistinguishability between epistemic states based on bisimulation, and provide a novel partition refinement algorithm for computing unique representatives of sets of indistinguishable states. We provide an algorithm for computing implicitly coordinated plans using these new constructs, embed it in a perceive-plan-act agent loop, and implement it on a robot. The planning algorithm is benchmarked against an existing epistemic planning algorithm, and the robotic implementation is demonstrated on human-robot collaboration scenarios requiring implicit coordination. Thomas Bolander, Lasse Dissing, Nicolai Herrmann |
KR | 2 |
| 2020 | Implementing Theory of Mind on a Robot Using Dynamic Epistemic LogicabstractPrevious research has claimed dynamic epistemic logic (DEL) to be a suitable formalism for representing essential aspects of a Theory of Mind (ToM) for an autonomous agent. This includes the ability of the formalism to represent the reasoning involved in false-belief tasks of arbitrary order, and hence for autonomous agents based on the formalism to become able to pass such tests. This paper provides evidence for the claims by documenting the implementation of a DEL-based reasoning system on a humanoid robot. Our implementation allows the robot to perform cognitive perspective-taking, in particular to reason about the first- and higher-order beliefs of other agents. We demonstrate how this allows the robot to pass a quite general class of false-belief tasks involving human agents. Additionally, as is briefly illustrated, it allows the robot to proactively provide human agents with relevant information in situations where a system without ToM-abilities would fail. The symbolic grounding problem of turning robotic sensor input into logical action descriptions in DEL is achieved via a perception system based on deep neural networks. Lasse Dissing, Thomas Bolander |
IJCAI | 1 |