Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ming C. Wu

dblp:27/11336 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-4808-6686ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
3D vision · 52% Autonomous driving · 30% Robot navigation and mapping · 13%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Computational fabrication · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d object detection
1.522025
TrajSSL: Trajectory-Enhanced Semi-Supervised 3D Object Detection · ICRA 2025
Center Feature Fusion: Selective Multi-Sensor Fusion of Center-based Objects · ICRA 2023
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception
1.522025
TrajSSL: Trajectory-Enhanced Semi-Supervised 3D Object Detection · ICRA 2025
Center Feature Fusion: Selective Multi-Sensor Fusion of Center-based Objects · ICRA 2023
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d object detection › label-efficient 3d object detection
semi-supervised 3d object detection
0.912025
TrajSSL: Trajectory-Enhanced Semi-Supervised 3D Object Detection · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
sensor fusion
0.712023
Center Feature Fusion: Selective Multi-Sensor Fusion of Center-based Objects · ICRA 2023
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning
pseudo-labeling
0.312025
TrajSSL: Trajectory-Enhanced Semi-Supervised 3D Object Detection · ICRA 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision › multimodal perception
LiDAR-camera fusion
0.212023
Center Feature Fusion: Selective Multi-Sensor Fusion of Center-based Objects · ICRA 2023
Computational fabrication › machining
micromachining
0.011997
Micromachining for optical and optoelectronic systems · Proc. IEEE 1997
Optical networks
optical devices
0.011997
Micromachining for optical and optoelectronic systems · Proc. IEEE 1997
Optical networks
optical switch
0.011997
Micromachining for optical and optoelectronic systems · Proc. IEEE 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

teacher-student framework · 0.9motion forecasting · 0.9center-based detection · 0.7bird's-eye-view projection · 0.7surface micromachining · 0.1bulk micromachining · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 TrajSSL: Trajectory-Enhanced Semi-Supervised 3D Object Detection
abstract
Semi-supervised 3D object detection is a common strategy employed to circumvent the challenge of manually labeling large-scale autonomous driving perception datasets. Pseudo-labeling approaches to semi-supervised learning adopt a teacher-student framework in which machine-generated pseudo-labels on a large unlabeled dataset are used in combination with a small manually-labeled dataset for training. In this work, we address the problem of improving pseudo-label quality through leveraging long- term temporal information captured in driving scenes. More specifically, we leverage pre-trained motion-forecasting models to generate object trajectories on pseudo-labeled data to further enhance the student model training. Our approach improves pseudo-label quality in two distinct manners: first, we suppress false positive pseudo-labels through establishing consistency across multiple frames of motion forecasting outputs. Second, we compensate for false negative detections by directly inserting predicted object tracks into the pseudo-labeled scene. Experiments on the nuScenes dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, improving the performance of standard semi-supervised approaches in a variety of settings.
Philip L. Jacobson, Yichen Xie 0002, Mingyu Ding, Chenfeng Xu, Masayoshi Tomizuka, Ming C. Wu
ICRA7
2023 Center Feature Fusion: Selective Multi-Sensor Fusion of Center-based Objects
abstract
Leveraging multi-modal fusion, especially between camera and LiDAR, has become essential for building accurate and robust 3D object detection systems for autonomous vehicles. Until recently, point decorating approaches, in which point clouds are augmented with camera features, have been the dominant approach in the field. However, these approaches fail to utilize the higher resolution images from cameras. Recent works projecting camera features to the bird's-eye-view (BEV) space for fusion have also been proposed, however they require projecting millions of pixels, most of which only contain background information. In this work, we propose a novel approach Center Feature Fusion (CFF), in which we leverage center-based detection networks in both the camera and LiDAR streams to identify relevant object locations. We then use the center-based detection to identify the locations of pixel features relevant to object locations, a small fraction of the total number in the image. These are then projected and fused in the BEV frame. On the nuScenes dataset, we outperform the LiDAR-only baseline by 4.9% mAP while fusing up to 100x fewer features than other fusion methods.
Philip L. Jacobson, Yiyang Zhou, Masayoshi Tomizuka, Ming C. Wu
ICRA5
1997 Micromachining for optical and optoelectronic systems
abstract
Micromachining technology opens up many new opportunities for optical and optoelectronic systems. It offers unprecedented capabilities in extending the functionality of optical devices and the miniaturization of optical systems. Movable structures, microactuators, and microoptical elements can be monolithically integrated on the same substrate using batch processing technologies. In this paper, we review the recent advances in this fast-emerging field. The basic bulk- and surface-micromachining technologies applicable to optical systems are reviewed. The free-space microoptical bench and the concept of optical prealignment are introduced. Examples of micromachined optical devices are described, including optical switches with low loss and high contract ratio, low-cost modulators, micromechanical scanners, and the XYZ micropositioners with large travel distance and fine positioning accuracy. Monolithically integrated systems such as single-chip optical disk pickup heads and a femtosecond autocorrelator have also been demonstrated.
Ming C. Wu
Proc. IEEE1