Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Cuihua Fang

dblp:27/2329 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
audio retrieval
0.112006
Audio similarity measure by graph modeling and matching · ACM Multimedia 2006
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › audio retrieval
audio similarity
0.112006
Audio similarity measure by graph modeling and matching · ACM Multimedia 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimal matching · 0.1graph matching · 0.1dynamic programming · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Audio similarity measure by graph modeling and matching
abstract
This paper proposes a new approach for the similarity measure and ranking of audio clips by graph modeling and matching. Instead of using frame-based or salient-based features to measure the acoustical similarity of audio clips, segment-based similarity is proposed. The novelty of our approach lies in two aspects: segment-based representation, and the similarity measure and ranking based on four kinds of similarity factors. In segmentbased representation, segments not only capture the change property of audio clip, but also keep and present the change relation and temporal order of audio features. In the similarity measure and ranking, four kinds of similarity factors: acoustical, granularity, temporal order and interference are progressively and jointly measured by optimal matching and dynamic programming, which guarantee the comprehensive and sufficient similarity measure between two audio clips. The experimental result shows that the proposed approach is better than some existing methods in terms of retrieval and ranking capabilities.
Yuxin Peng 0001, Chong-Wah Ngo, Cuihua Fang, Xiaoou Chen, Jianguo Xiao
ACM Multimedia3