Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Takuma Morita

dblp:27/3235 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Robot manipulation · 55% Reinforcement learning · 38% Representation and self-supervised learning · 7%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning
learning from observation
0.122006
Representation for knot-tying tasks · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2006
Knot planning from observation · ICRA 2003
Robotics › Robot manipulation
deformable object manipulation
0.122006
Representation for knot-tying tasks · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2006
Knot planning from observation · ICRA 2003
Robotics › Robot manipulation › deformable object manipulation
knot tying
0.122006
Representation for knot-tying tasks · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2006
Knot planning from observation · ICRA 2003
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › joint representation learning › multi-task representation learning
task representation
0.012006
Representation for knot-tying tasks · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

knot theory · 0.1learning from observation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Representation for knot-tying tasks
abstract
The learning from observation (LFO) paradigm has been widely applied in various types of robot systems. It helps reduce the work of the programmer. However, the applications of available systems are limited to manipulation of rigid objects. Manipulation of deformable objects is rarely considered, because it is difficult to design a method for representing states of deformable objects and operations against them. Furthermore, too many operations are possible on them. In this paper, we choose knot tying as a case study for manipulating deformable objects, because the knot theory is available and the types of operations possible in knot tying are limited. We propose a knot planning from observation (KPO) paradigm, a KPO theory, and a KPO system.
Jun Takamatsu, Takuma Morita, Koichi Ogawara, Hiroshi Kimura, Katsushi Ikeuchi
IEEE Trans. Robotics2
2003 Knot planning from observation
abstract
Learning from Observation (LFO) has been widely applied in various types of robot system. It helps reduce the work of the programmer. But the available systems have application limited to rigid objects. Deformable objects are not considered because: 1) it is difficult to describe their state, and 2) too many operations are possible on them. In this paper, we choose the knot tying as case study for operating on nonrigid bodies, because a "knot theory" is available and the type of operations is limited. We describe the Knot Planning from Observation (KPO) paradigm, KPO theory and KPO system.
Takuma Morita, Jun Takamatsu, Koichi Ogawara, Hiroshi Kimura, Katsushi Ikeuchi
ICRA1