Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sanjeev Kumar 0004

dblp:27/343-4 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
0000-0003-0941-3509ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Multi-agent systems · 39% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 31% Question answering and dialogue systems · 31%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Logic in computer science · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › epistemic reasoning
belief reasoning
0.112006
Integrating Joint Intention Theory, Belief Reasoning, and Communicative Action for Generating Team-Oriented Dialogue · AAAI 2006
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
communicative acts
0.112006
Integrating Joint Intention Theory, Belief Reasoning, and Communicative Action for Generating Team-Oriented Dialogue · AAAI 2006
Logic in computer science
formal semantics
0.112005
Distributive and Collective Readings in Group Protocols · IJCAI 2005
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
distributed reasoning
0.012005
Distributive and Collective Readings in Group Protocols · IJCAI 2005
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Integrating Joint Intention Theory, Belief Reasoning, and Communicative Action for Generating Team-Oriented Dialogue
Rajah Annamalai Subramanian, Sanjeev Kumar 0004, Phil Cohen 0001
AAAI2
2005 Distributive and Collective Readings in Group Protocols
Silvia Rossi 0002, Sanjeev Kumar 0004, Phil Cohen 0001
IJCAI2
2004 Multimodal interaction under exerted conditions in a natural field setting
abstract
This paper evaluates the performance of a multimodal interface under exerted conditions in a natural field setting. The subjects in the present study engaged in a strenuous activity while multimodally performing map-based tasks using handheld computing devices. This activity made the users breathe heavily and become fatigued during the course of the study. We found that the performance of both speech and gesture recognizers degraded as a function of exertion, while the overall multimodal success rate was stable. This stabilization is accounted for by the mutual disambiguation of modalities, which increases significantly with exertion. The system performed better for subjects with a greater level of physical fitness, as measured by their running speed, with more stable multimodal performance and a later degradation of speech and gesture recognition as compared with subjects who were less fit. The findings presented in this paper have a significant impact on design decisions for multimodal interfaces targeted towards highly mobile and exerted users in field environments.
Sanjeev Kumar 0004, Phil Cohen 0001, Rachel Coulston
ICMI1
2002 Toward A Formalism for Conversation Protocols Using Joint Intention Theory
abstract
Conversation protocols are used to achieve certain goals or to bring about certain states in the world. Therefore, one may identify the landmarks or the states that must be brought about during the goal–directed execution of a protocol. Accordingly, the landmarks, characterized by propositions that are true in the state represented by that landmark, are the most important aspect of a protocol. Families of conversation protocols can be expressed formally as partially ordered landmarks after the landmarks necessary to achieve a goal have been identified. Concrete protocols represented as joint action expressions can, then, be derived from the partially ordered landmarks and executed directly by joint intention interpreters. This approach of applying Joint Intention theory to protocols also supports flexibility in the actions used to get to landmarks, shortcutting protocol execution, automatic exception handling, and correctness criterion for protocols and protocol compositions.
Sanjeev Kumar 0004, Marcus J. Huber, Phil Cohen 0001, David McGee
Comput. Intell.1