Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tom Coleman

dblp:27/346 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 3 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 44% Approximation and online algorithms · 28% Algorithms and data structures · 28%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms
clustering approximation
0.112010
A Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme for k-Consensus Clustering · SODA 2010
Algorithms and data structures › clustering
consensus clustering
0.112010
A Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme for k-Consensus Clustering · SODA 2010
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph clustering
correlation clustering
0.112010
A Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme for k-Consensus Clustering · SODA 2010
Data mining
clustering
0.112008
Spectral clustering with inconsistent advice · ICML 2008
Data mining › clustering
constrained clustering
0.112008
Spectral clustering with inconsistent advice · ICML 2008
Data mining › clustering
spectral clustering
0.112008
Spectral clustering with inconsistent advice · ICML 2008
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph partitioning
0.012010
A Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme for k-Consensus Clustering · SODA 2010
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph cut
minimum k-cut
0.012010
A Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme for k-Consensus Clustering · SODA 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

polynomial-time approximation scheme · 0.1minimum cost perfect matching · 0.1minimum normalized cut · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 A Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme for k-Consensus Clustering
abstract
This paper introduces a polynomial time approximation scheme for the metric Correlation Clustering problem, when the number of clusters returned is bounded (by k). Consensus Clustering is a fundamental aggregation problem, with considerable application, and it is analysed here as a metric variant of the Correlation Clustering problem. The PTAS exploits a connection between Correlation Clustering and the k-cut problems. This requires the introduction of a new rebalancing technique, based on minimum cost perfect matchings, to provide clusters of the required sizes. Both Consensus Clustering and Correlation Clustering have been the focus of considerable recent study. There is an existing dichotomy between the k-restricted Correlation Clustering problems and the unrestricted versions. The former, in general, admit a PTAS, whereas the latter are, in general, APX-hard. This paper extends the dichotomy to the metric case, responding to the result that Consensus Clustering is APX-hard to approximate.
Tom Coleman, Anthony Wirth
SODA1
2008 Ranking Tournaments: Local Search and a New Algorithm
abstract
Ranking data is a fundamental organizational activity. Given advice, we may wish to rank a set of items to satisfy as much of that advice as possible. In the Feedback Arc Set (FAS) problem, advice takes the form of pairwise ordering statements, ‘a should be ranked before b’. Instances in which there is advice about every pair of items is known as a tournament. This task is equivalent to ordering the nodes of a given directed graph to minimize the number of arcs pointing in one direction. In the past, much work focused on finding good, effective heuristics for solving the problem. Recently, a proof of the NP-completeness of the problem (even when restricted to tournaments) has accompanied new algorithms with approximation guarantees, culminating in the development of a PTAS (polynomial time approximation scheme) for solving FAS on tournaments. In this paper we re-examine many of these existing algorithms and develop some new techniques for solving FAS. The algorithms are tested on both synthetic and Rank Aggregation-based datasets. We find that, in practice, local-search algorithms are very powerful, even though we prove that they do not have approximation guarantees. Our new algorithm is based on reversing arcs whose nodes have large indegree differences, eventually leading to a total ordering. Combining this with a powerful local-search technique yields an algorithm that beats existing techniques on a variety of data sets.
Tom Coleman, Anthony Wirth
ALENEX1
2008 A Local-Search 2-Approximation for 2-Correlation-Clustering
Tom Coleman, James Saunderson, Anthony Wirth
ESA1
2008 Spectral clustering with inconsistent advice
abstract
Clustering with advice (often known as constrained clustering) has been a recent focus of the data mining community. Success has been achieved incorporating advice into the k-means and spectral clustering frameworks. Although the theory community has explored inconsistent advice, it has not yet been incorporated into spectral clustering. Extending work of De Bie and Cristianini, we set out a framework for finding minimum normalised cuts, subject to inconsistent advice.
Tom Coleman, James Saunderson, Anthony Wirth
ICML1