Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tom Coleman
dblp:27/346
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 3 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 44% Approximation and online algorithms · 28% Algorithms and data structures · 28% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms
clustering approximation |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | A Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme for k-Consensus Clustering · SODA 2010 |
Algorithms and data structures › clustering
consensus clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | A Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme for k-Consensus Clustering · SODA 2010 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph clustering
correlation clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | A Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme for k-Consensus Clustering · SODA 2010 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Spectral clustering with inconsistent advice · ICML 2008 |
Data mining › clustering
constrained clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Spectral clustering with inconsistent advice · ICML 2008 |
Data mining › clustering
spectral clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Spectral clustering with inconsistent advice · ICML 2008 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph partitioning |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | A Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme for k-Consensus Clustering · SODA 2010 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph cut
minimum k-cut |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | A Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme for k-Consensus Clustering · SODA 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
polynomial-time approximation scheme · 0.1minimum cost perfect matching · 0.1minimum normalized cut · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | A Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme for k-Consensus ClusteringabstractThis paper introduces a polynomial time approximation scheme for the metric Correlation Clustering problem, when the number of clusters returned is bounded (by k). Consensus Clustering is a fundamental aggregation problem, with considerable application, and it is analysed here as a metric variant of the Correlation Clustering problem. The PTAS exploits a connection between Correlation Clustering and the k-cut problems. This requires the introduction of a new rebalancing technique, based on minimum cost perfect matchings, to provide clusters of the required sizes. Both Consensus Clustering and Correlation Clustering have been the focus of considerable recent study. There is an existing dichotomy between the k-restricted Correlation Clustering problems and the unrestricted versions. The former, in general, admit a PTAS, whereas the latter are, in general, APX-hard. This paper extends the dichotomy to the metric case, responding to the result that Consensus Clustering is APX-hard to approximate. Tom Coleman, Anthony Wirth |
SODA | 1 |
| 2008 | Ranking Tournaments: Local Search and a New AlgorithmabstractRanking data is a fundamental organizational activity. Given advice, we may wish to rank a set of items to satisfy as much of that advice as possible. In the Feedback Arc Set (FAS) problem, advice takes the form of pairwise ordering statements, ‘a should be ranked before b’. Instances in which there is advice about every pair of items is known as a tournament. This task is equivalent to ordering the nodes of a given directed graph to minimize the number of arcs pointing in one direction. In the past, much work focused on finding good, effective heuristics for solving the problem. Recently, a proof of the NP-completeness of the problem (even when restricted to tournaments) has accompanied new algorithms with approximation guarantees, culminating in the development of a PTAS (polynomial time approximation scheme) for solving FAS on tournaments. In this paper we re-examine many of these existing algorithms and develop some new techniques for solving FAS. The algorithms are tested on both synthetic and Rank Aggregation-based datasets. We find that, in practice, local-search algorithms are very powerful, even though we prove that they do not have approximation guarantees. Our new algorithm is based on reversing arcs whose nodes have large indegree differences, eventually leading to a total ordering. Combining this with a powerful local-search technique yields an algorithm that beats existing techniques on a variety of data sets. Tom Coleman, Anthony Wirth |
ALENEX | 1 |
| 2008 | A Local-Search 2-Approximation for 2-Correlation-Clustering
Tom Coleman, James Saunderson, Anthony Wirth |
ESA | 1 |
| 2008 | Spectral clustering with inconsistent adviceabstractClustering with advice (often known as constrained clustering) has been a recent focus of the data mining community. Success has been achieved incorporating advice into the k-means and spectral clustering frameworks. Although the theory community has explored inconsistent advice, it has not yet been incorporated into spectral clustering. Extending work of De Bie and Cristianini, we set out a framework for finding minimum normalised cuts, subject to inconsistent advice. Tom Coleman, James Saunderson, Anthony Wirth |
ICML | 1 |