Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
James D. Keeler
dblp:27/4358
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 3 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Motion planning and robot control · 26% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 26% Image recognition and object detection · 16% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Neural Network Based Model Predictive Control · NIPS 1999 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › intelligent control
neural network control |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Neural Network Based Model Predictive Control · NIPS 1999 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › character recognition
handwritten digit recognition |
0.0 | 2 | 1991 | A Self-Organizing Integrated Segmentation and Recognition Neural Net · NIPS 1991 Integrated Segmentation and Recognition of Hand-Printed Numerals · NIPS 1990 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › multi-task learning
joint segmentation and recognition |
0.0 | 2 | 1991 | A Self-Organizing Integrated Segmentation and Recognition Neural Net · NIPS 1991 Integrated Segmentation and Recognition of Hand-Printed Numerals · NIPS 1990 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network
radial basis function network |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Algorithms for Better Representation and Faster Learning in Radial Basis Function Networks · NIPS 1989 |
Algorithms and data structures
learning algorithms |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Algorithms for Better Representation and Faster Learning in Radial Basis Function Networks · NIPS 1989 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
associative memory |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | Capacity for Patterns and Sequences in Kanerva's SDM as Compared to Other Associative Memory Models · NIPS 1987 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › associative memory
sparse distributed memory |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | Capacity for Patterns and Sequences in Kanerva's SDM as Compared to Other Associative Memory Models · NIPS 1987 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neural network · 0.0model predictive control · 0.0self-organizing neural network · 0.0radial basis function networks · 0.0radial basis function network · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | Neural Network Based Model Predictive Control
Stephen Piche, James D. Keeler, Greg Martin, Gene Boe, Doug Johnson, Mark Gerules |
NIPS | 2 |
| 1991 | A Self-Organizing Integrated Segmentation and Recognition Neural Net
James D. Keeler, David E. Rumelhart |
NIPS | 1 |
| 1991 | Predicting the Future: Advantages of Semilocal UnitsabstractIn investigating gaussian radial basis function (RBF) networks for their ability to model nonlinear time series, we have found that while RBF networks are much faster than standard sigmoid unit backpropagation for low-dimensional problems, their advantages diminish in high-dimensional input spaces. This is particularly troublesome if the input space contains irrelevant variables. We suggest that this limitation is due to the localized nature of RBFs. To gain the advantages of the highly nonlocal sigmoids and the speed advantages of RBFs, we propose a particular class of semilocal activation functions that is a natural interpolation between these two families. We present evidence that networks using these gaussian bar units avoid the slow learning problem of sigmoid unit networks, and, very importantly, are more accurate than RBF networks in the presence of irrelevant inputs. On the Mackey-Glass and Coupled Lattice Map problems, the speedup over sigmoid networks is so dramatic that the difference in training time between RBF and gaussian bar networks is minor. Gaussian bar architectures that superpose composed gaussians (gaussians-of-gaussians) to approximate the unknown function have the best performance. We postulate that an interesing behavior displayed by gaussian bar functions under gradient descent dynamics, which we call automatic connection pruning, is an important factor in the success of this representation. Eric Hartman, James D. Keeler |
Neural Comput. | 2 |
| 1990 | Integrated Segmentation and Recognition of Hand-Printed Numerals
James D. Keeler, David E. Rumelhart, Wee Kheng Leow |
NIPS | 1 |
| 1990 | Layered Neural Networks with Gaussian Hidden Units as Universal ApproximationsabstractA neural network with a single layer of hidden units of gaussian type is proved to be a universal approximator for real-valued maps defined on convex, compact sets of Rn. Eric Hartman, James D. Keeler, Jacek M. Kowalski |
Neural Comput. | 2 |
| 1990 | An Optoelectronic Architecture for Multilayer Learning in a Single Photorefractive CrystalabstractWe propose a simple architecture for implementing supervised neural network models optically with photorefractive technology. The architecture is very versatile: a wide range of supervised learning algorithms can be implemented including mean-field-theory, backpropagation, and Kanerva-style networks. Our architecture is based on a single crystal with spatial multiplexing rather than the more commonly used angular multiplexing. It handles hidden units and places no restrictions on connectivity. Associated with spatial multiplexing are certain physical phenomena, rescattering and beam depletion, which tend to degrade the matrix multiplications. Detailed simulations including beam absorption and grating decay show that the supervised learning algorithms (slightly modified) compensate for these degradations. Carsten Peterson, Stephen Redfield, James D. Keeler, Eric Hartman |
Neural Comput. | 3 |
| 1989 | Algorithms for Better Representation and Faster Learning in Radial Basis Function Networks
Avijit Saha, James D. Keeler |
NIPS | 2 |
| 1987 | Capacity for Patterns and Sequences in Kanerva's SDM as Compared to Other Associative Memory Models
James D. Keeler |
NIPS | 1 |