Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Henning Wunderlich

dblp:27/954 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 4 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational complexity · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Programming languages and type systems · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity › complexity classes
polynomial-time computability
0.112006
Certifying Polynomial Time and Linear/Polynomial Space for Imperative Programs · SIAM J. Comput. 2006
Computational complexity
space complexity
0.112006
Certifying Polynomial Time and Linear/Polynomial Space for Imperative Programs · SIAM J. Comput. 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

matrix certificate · 0.1for-do statements · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 On a Theorem of Razborov
Henning Wunderlich
Comput. Complex.1
2009 On Toda's Theorem in Structural Communication Complexity
Henning Wunderlich
SOFSEM1
2009 On cover-structure graphs
Henning Wunderlich
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2007 A characterization of average case communication complexity
Martin Dietzfelbinger, Henning Wunderlich
Inf. Process. Lett.2
2006 Certifying Polynomial Time and Linear/Polynomial Space for Imperative Programs
abstract
In earlier work of Kristiansen and Niggl the polynomial-time computable functions were characterized by stack programs of $\mu$-measure 0, and the linear-space computable functions by loop programs of $\mu$-measure 0. Until recently, an open problem was how to extend these characterizations to programs with user-friendly basic instructions, such as assignment statements, and with mixed data structures. It is shown how to strengthen the above characterizations to imperative programs built from arbitrary basic instructions by sequencing and by if-then-else and for-do statements. These programs operate on variables, each of which may represent any data structure such as stacks, registers, trees, or graphs. The paper presents a new method of certifying "polynomial size boundedness" of such imperative programs under the natural assumption that the basic instructions used are polynomially size bounded, too. The certificate for a program ${\tt P}$ with variables among ${\tt X}_{1}, \ldots, {\tt X}_{n}$ will be an $(n+1)\times (n+1)$ matrix $M({\tt P})$ over the finite set $\{ 0, 1, \infty\}$. It is shown that certified string programs (i.e., stack programs, but with any polynomial-time computable basic instructions) exactly compute the functions in {\sc fptime}. Accordingly, certified general loop programs (using any linear-space computable basic instructions) exactly compute the functions in {\sc flinspace}. Furthermore, it is shown that certified power string programs (i.e., string programs, but built from polynomial-space computable basic instructions and extended by power loop statements) exactly compute the polynomial-space computable functions in {\sc fpspace}. In addition, examples of certified "natural" (implementations of) algorithms, such as insertion-sort or binary addition and multiplication, are given.
Karl-Heinz Niggl, Henning Wunderlich
SIAM J. Comput.2