Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jiaqi Leng 0001

dblp:271/0195-1 · also Jiaqi (Jimmy) Leng · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-9276-2832ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Mathematical optimization · 51% Quantum computing and quantum information · 49%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Emerging computing paradigms · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization
0.912025
Quantum Optimization via Gradient-Based Hamiltonian Descent · ICML 2025
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods
gradient-based optimization
0.912025
Quantum Optimization via Gradient-Based Hamiltonian Descent · ICML 2025
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum algorithms
0.912025
Quantum Optimization via Gradient-Based Hamiltonian Descent · ICML 2025
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum algorithms
quantum optimization
0.912025
Quantum Optimization via Gradient-Based Hamiltonian Descent · ICML 2025
Emerging computing paradigms
quantum computer architecture
0.812024
Differentiable Quantum Computing for Large-scale Linear Control · NeurIPS 2024
Emerging computing paradigms
quantum computing
0.812024
Differentiable Quantum Computing for Large-scale Linear Control · NeurIPS 2024
Mathematical optimization › control theory › optimal control
linear quadratic control
0.212024
Differentiable Quantum Computing for Large-scale Linear Control · NeurIPS 2024
Mathematical optimization › control theory
optimal control
0.212024
Differentiable Quantum Computing for Large-scale Linear Control · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stochastic approximation · 1.5quantum subroutine for lyapunov equation · 1.5policy gradient · 1.5quantum tunneling · 0.9hamiltonian descent · 0.9gradient descent · 0.9stochastic gradient descent · 0.6monte-carlo gradient estimation · 0.6differentiable programming · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Quantum Optimization via Gradient-Based Hamiltonian Descent
abstract
With rapid advancements in machine learning, first-order algorithms have emerged as the backbone of modern optimization techniques, owing to their computational efficiency and low memory requirements. Recently, the connection between accelerated gradient methods and damped heavy-ball motion, particularly within the framework of Hamiltonian dynamics, has inspired the development of innovative quantum algorithms for continuous optimization. One such algorithm, Quantum Hamiltonian Descent (QHD), leverages quantum tunneling to escape saddle points and local minima, facilitating the discovery of global solutions in complex optimization landscapes. However, QHD faces several challenges, including slower convergence rates compared to classical gradient methods and limited robustness in highly non-convex problems due to the non-local nature of quantum states. Furthermore, the original QHD formulation primarily relies on function value information, which limits its effectiveness. Inspired by insights from high-resolution differential equations that have elucidated the acceleration mechanisms in classical methods, we propose an enhancement to QHD by incorporating gradient information, leading to what we call gradient-based QHD. This gradient-based QHD achieves faster convergence and significantly increases the likelihood of identifying global solutions. Numerical simulations on challenging problem instances demonstrate that this gradient-based QHD outperforms existing quantum and classical methods by at least an order of magnitude.
Jiaqi Leng 0001
ICML1
2025 QHDOPT: A Software for Nonlinear Optimization with Quantum Hamiltonian Descent
abstract
We develop an open-source, end-to-end software (named QHDOPT), which can solve nonlinear optimization problems using the quantum Hamiltonian descent (QHD) algorithm. QHDOPT offers an accessible interface and automatically maps tasks to various supported quantum backends (i.e., quantum hardware machines). These features enable users, even those without prior knowledge or experience in quantum computing, to utilize the power of existing quantum devices for nonlinear and nonconvex optimization tasks. In its intermediate compilation layer, QHDOPT employs SimuQ, an efficient interface for Hamiltonian-oriented programming, to facilitate multiple algorithmic specifications and ensure compatible cross-hardware deployment. The detailed documentation of QHDOPT is available at https://github.com/jiaqileng/QHDOPT . History: Accepted by Giacomo Nannicini, Area Editor for Quantum Computing and Operations Research. Accepted for Special Issue. Funding: This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Advanced Research Projects Agency–Energy [Grant DE-SC0020273], the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Simons Foundation [Simons Investigator Award 825053], the Simons Quantum Postdoctoral Fellowship, the National Science Foundation [Grants CCF-1816695, CCF-1942837, and ECCS-2045978], the Unitary Fund, and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research [Grant FA95502110051]. Supplemental Material: The software that supports the findings of this study is available within the paper and its Supplemental Information ( https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/suppl/10.1287/ijoc.2024.0587 ) as well as from the IJOC GitHub software repository ( https://github.com/INFORMSJoC/2024.0587 ). The complete IJOC Software and Data Repository is available at https://informsjoc.github.io/ .
Samuel Kushnir, Jiaqi Leng 0001, Yuxiang Peng 0004, Lei Fan 0006, Xiaodi Wu 0001
INFORMS J. Comput.2
2024 Differentiable Quantum Computing for Large-scale Linear Control
abstract
As industrial models and designs grow increasingly complex, the demand for optimal control of large-scale dynamical systems has significantly increased. However, traditional methods for optimal control incur significant overhead as problem dimensions grow. In this paper, we introduce an end-to-end quantum algorithm for linear-quadratic control with provable speedups. Our algorithm, based on a policy gradient method, incorporates a novel quantum subroutine for solving the matrix Lyapunov equation. Specifically, we build a *quantum-assisted differentiable simulator* for efficient gradient estimation that is more accurate and robust than classical methods relying on stochastic approximation. Compared to the classical approaches, our method achieves a *super-quadratic* speedup. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first end-to-end quantum application to linear control problems with provable quantum advantage.
Connor Clayton, Jiaqi Leng 0001, Gengzhi Yang, Yi-Ling Qiao, Ming C. Lin, Xiaodi Wu 0001
NeurIPS2
2022 Differentiable Analog Quantum Computing for Optimization and Control
abstract
We formulate the first differentiable analog quantum computing framework with specific parameterization design at the analog signal (pulse) level to better exploit near-term quantum devices via variational methods. We further propose a scalable approach to estimate the gradients of quantum dynamics using a forward pass with Monte Carlo sampling, which leads to a quantum stochastic gradient descent algorithm for scalable gradient-based training in our framework. Applying our framework to quantum optimization and control, we observe a significant advantage of differentiable analog quantum computing against SOTAs based on parameterized digital quantum circuits by {\em orders of magnitude}.
Jiaqi Leng 0001, Yuxiang Peng 0004, Yi-Ling Qiao, Ming C. Lin, Xiaodi Wu 0001
NeurIPS1