Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

P. Kotiveeriah

dblp:271/1465 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1982
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Physical-layer communications · 77% Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Physical-layer communications › spread spectrum
frequency-hop communications
0.011982
Partial Processing Satellite Relays for Frequency-Hop Antijam Communications · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1982
Physical-layer communications
spread spectrum
0.011982
Partial Processing Satellite Relays for Frequency-Hop Antijam Communications · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1982
Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks › satellite communication
on-board processing
0.011982
Partial Processing Satellite Relays for Frequency-Hop Antijam Communications · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1982
Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks
satellite communication
0.011982
Partial Processing Satellite Relays for Frequency-Hop Antijam Communications · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1982

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

bit error probability · 0.0SNR analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1982 Partial Processing Satellite Relays for Frequency-Hop Antijam Communications
abstract
Military satellite communications systems may be implemented with varying levels of satellite on-board processing. For frequency-hop (FH) spread-spectrum signals two options are the dehop-rehop transponder (DRT) and the symbol regenerative processor (SRP). This paper considers FH,M-ary FSK modulation in the presence of full band and worst case partial-band noise jamming. The relationships among end-to-end signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) performance or probability of bit errors and the uplink and downlink SNR are derived. For a DRT, an additional parameter is the satellite filter bandwidth Wssince this may differ from the despread modulation bandwidth Wrfor a particular user access under TDMA variable-data-rate operation. The SNR performance in this case depends upon the ratioW_{s}/W_{r}a well as the uplink and downlink SNR. The resulting penalty in the link budget of the weaker of the uplink or downlink is much less than the mismatched ratioW_{s}/W_{r}and diminishes as the links become unbalanced. The SRP slightly outperforms the DRT but it is more complex and does not as easily accommodate variable data rates.
Steven M. Sussman, P. Kotiveeriah
IEEE Trans. Commun.2