Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Barbara A. Czekaj-Augun

dblp:271/2229 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1982
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Physical-layer communications · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Physical-layer communications › modulation
digital radio
0.011982
Performance Comparisons Among Digital Radio Techniques Subjected to Multipath Fading · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1982
Physical-layer communications
modulation
0.011982
Performance Comparisons Among Digital Radio Techniques Subjected to Multipath Fading · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1982
Physical-layer communications › fading channels
multipath fading
0.011982
Performance Comparisons Among Digital Radio Techniques Subjected to Multipath Fading · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1982
Physical-layer communications › channel modeling › propagation channel modeling
wireless channel modeling
0.011982
Performance Comparisons Among Digital Radio Techniques Subjected to Multipath Fading · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1982
Physical-layer communications › equalization
adaptive equalization
0.011982
Performance Comparisons Among Digital Radio Techniques Subjected to Multipath Fading · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1982

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

performance comparison · 0.0eye pattern analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1982 Performance Comparisons Among Digital Radio Techniques Subjected to Multipath Fading
abstract
A major source of impairment in microwave digital radio is multipath fading, a phenomenon sufficiently prevalent on many paths to frustrate, the attainment of reliability objectives. Performance during multipath fading depends on such system parameters as channel bandwidth and type of modulation, and on details of the receiver processing (e.g., adaptive schemes, synchronization schemes). This paper compares the performance of different digital radio techniques in the presence of multipath fading. The measure used is the expected fraction of time, conditioned on the occurrence of a fading event, that the eye pattern at the receiver detector is closed. This measure is plotted against spectral efficiency (bit rate/channel bandwidth) for various types of modulation (QPSK, offset QPSK, 8-PSK, 16-PSK, 16-QAM, and offset 16-QAM) and for various forms of carrier recovery, timing recovery, transmit/receive filtering, and adaptive equalization. The computations assume a multipath fading frequency response described by a first-order complex polynomial, where the coefficients obey an empirically derived probability law reported previously. The comparisons show clearly the superiority of high-level modulation and the inferiority of offset modulation. The comparisons also demonstrate significant improvements for each of two adaptive equalizers postulated here.
Larry J. Greenstein, Barbara A. Czekaj-Augun
IEEE Trans. Commun.2