Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrea De Maio
dblp:271/4390
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-7970-6596ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Robot navigation and mapping · 60% 3D vision · 20% Trustworthy machine learning · 20% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › scan matching
ICP covariance estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Deep Bayesian ICP Covariance Estimation · ICRA 2022 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
point cloud registration |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Deep Bayesian ICP Covariance Estimation · ICRA 2022 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
SLAM |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Deep Bayesian ICP Covariance Estimation · ICRA 2022 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
state estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Deep Bayesian ICP Covariance Estimation · ICRA 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Deep Bayesian ICP Covariance Estimation · ICRA 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational bayesian inference · 0.6heteroscedastic aleatoric uncertainty · 0.6deep learning · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Deep Bayesian ICP Covariance EstimationabstractCovariance estimation for the Iterative Closest Point (ICP) point cloud registration algorithm is essential for state estimation and sensor fusion purposes. We argue that a major source of error for ICP is in the input data itself, from the sensor noise to the scene geometry. Benefiting from recent developments in deep learning for point clouds, we propose a data-driven approach to learn an error model for ICP. We estimate covariances modeling data-dependent heteroscedastic aleatoric uncertainty, and epistemic uncertainty using a variational Bayesian approach. The system evaluation is performed on LiDAR odometry on different datasets, highlighting good results in comparison to the state of the art. Andrea De Maio, Simon Lacroix |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2022 | DUNE: Deep UNcertainty Estimation for tracked visual featuresabstractUncertainty estimation of visual feature is essential for vision-based systems, such as visual navigation. We show that errors inherent to visual tracking, in particular using KLT tracker, can be learned using a probabilistic loss function to estimate the covariance matrix on each tracked feature position. The proposed system is trained and evaluated on synthetic data, as well as on real data, highlighting good results in comparison to the state of the art. The benefits of the tracking uncertainty estimates are illustrated for visual motion estimation. Katia Sousa Lillo, Andrea De Maio, Simon Lacroix, Amaury Nègre, Michèle Rombaut, Nicolas Marchand, Nicolas Vercier |
IPAS | 2 |