Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

William A. Luther

dblp:271/5158 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1981
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Wireless networking · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Wireless networking › cognitive radio › spectrum management
spectrum regulation
0.011981
Frequency Tolerances and Spurious Emission Limitations · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1981
Wireless networking › cognitive radio
spectrum management
0.011981
Frequency Tolerances and Spurious Emission Limitations · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1981

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

regulatory analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1981 Classification and Designation of Emissions
abstract
A new, much more complex, but needed, system of designating emissions has been agreed and incorporated into the Final Acts of WARC-79. Its use will be mandatory for frequency registration with the International Frequency Registration Board (IFRB) after January 1, 1982. Full designation is with nine alphanumeric characters in two parts; four characters for necessary bandwidth followed by five symbols for emission classification. Of the five classification symbols, three are mandatory and are found in the lists of Article 4. The last two symbols, which are optional for use, may be taken from lists in Appendix 6. WARC-79 made provision for expanding the choices of the optional symbols to give future flexibility as technology develops. The complete method for designating emissions is contained in this paper.
William A. Luther
IEEE Trans. Commun.1
1981 Frequency Tolerances and Spurious Emission Limitations
abstract
Appendices 7 and 8 of the WARC-79 Final Acts contain, respectively, the Table of Transmitter Frequency Tolerances and the Table of Maximum Permitted Spurious Emission Power Levels. Decisions taken at that Conference on these two new Tables will eventually touch transmitter manufacturers and users everywhere. Frequency tolerances in most bands are tightened for new equipment effective January 2, 1985. TV broadcast for system M (NTSC) from 29.7 to 2450 MHz and broadcasting in the 535 to 1606.5-kHz bands remain the same. Earth and space services were introduced in the Table for the first time with impact from 4 MHz on up to 40 GHz after 1985. Relatively tight frequency tolerances are those for HF broadcasting, single sideband (SSB), and pulse modulation above 10 GHz. Peak envelope power rather than mean power is shown generally for SSB transmitters limits. The frequency tolerance limits, again, did not reach beyond 40 GHz. New spurious emission limits come into effect on that same date for new transmitters operating between 235 MHz and 17.7 GHz, although radiodetermination and emergencytype transmitters are excluded. There is also a special exception for spurious emissions of transmitters operating above 235 MHz where transmitters feed a common antenna or where an antenna farm exists [see Note 10 of Appendix 8]. Spurious emissions have been significantly redefined. It is suggested those concerned with such limits be familiar with the new definition contained in RR 139 of Article 1 of the Final Acts.
Robert T. Watson, William A. Luther
IEEE Trans. Commun.2