Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yuxi Xia
dblp:272/8976
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-5879-7209ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation › large language model uncertainty
LLM calibration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Influences on LLM Calibration: A Study of Response Agreement, Loss Functions, and Prompt Styles · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Influences on LLM Calibration: A Study of Response Agreement, Loss Functions, and Prompt Styles · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
confidence estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Influences on LLM Calibration: A Study of Response Agreement, Loss Functions, and Prompt Styles · ACL (1) 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
focal loss · 0.9auxiliary confidence model · 0.9AUC surrogate loss · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Influential Training Data Retrieval for Explaining Verbalized Confidence of LLMs
Yuxi Xia, Loris Schoenegger, Benjamin Roth 0001 |
ECIR (1) | 1 |
| 2025 | Influences on LLM Calibration: A Study of Response Agreement, Loss Functions, and Prompt StylesabstractCalibration, the alignment between model confidence and prediction accuracy, is critical for the reliable deployment of large language models (LLMs).Existing works neglect to measure the generalization of their methods to other prompt styles and different sizes of LLMs.To address this, we define a controlled experimental setting covering 12 LLMs and four prompt styles.We additionally investigate if incorporating the response agreement of multiple LLMs and an appropriate loss function can improve calibration performance.Concretely, we build Calib-n, a novel framework that trains an auxiliary model for confidence estimation that aggregates responses from multiple LLMs to capture inter-model agreement.To optimize calibration, we integrate focal and AUC surrogate losses alongside binary cross-entropy.Experiments across four datasets demonstrate that both response agreement and focal loss improve calibration from baselines.We find that few-shot prompts are the most effective for auxiliary model-based methods, and auxiliary models demonstrate robust calibration performance across accuracy variations, outperforming LLMs' internal probabilities and verbalized confidences. 1 Sigmoid ... Yuxi Xia, Pedro Henrique Luz de Araujo, Klim Zaporojets, Benjamin Roth 0001 |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2021 | WAFFLE: Watermarking in Federated LearningabstractFederated learning is a distributed learning technique where machine learning models are trained on client devices in which the local training data resides. The training is coordinated via a central server which is, typically, controlled by the intended owner of the resulting model. By avoiding the need to transport the training data to the central server, federated learning improves privacy and efficiency. But it raises the risk of model theft by clients because the resulting model is available on every client device. Even if the application software used for local training may attempt to prevent direct access to the model, a malicious client may bypass any such restrictions by reverse engineering the application software. Watermarking is a well-known deterrence method against model theft by providing the means for model owners to demonstrate ownership of their models. Several recent deep neural network (DNN) watermarking techniques use backdooring: training the models with additional mislabeled data. Backdooring requires full access to the training data and control of the training process. This is feasible when a single party trains the model in a centralized manner, but not in a federated learning setting where the training process and training data are distributed among several client devices. In this paper, we present WAFFLE, the first approach to watermark DNN models trained using federated learning. It introduces a retraining step at the server after each aggregation of local models into the global model. We show that WAFFLE efficiently embeds a resilient watermark into models incurring only negligible degradation in test accuracy (-0.17%), and does not require access to training data. We also introduce a novel technique to generate the backdoor used as a watermark. It outperforms prior techniques, imposing no communication, and low computational (+3.2%) overhead11The research report version of this paper is also available in https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.07298, and the code for reproducing our work can be found at https://github.com/ssg-research/WAFFLE. Buse G. A. Tekgul, Yuxi Xia, Samuel Marchal, N. Asokan |
SRDS | 2 |