Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

David C. Torretta

dblp:273/0920 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1974
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Physical-layer communications · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Physical-layer communications
error probability analysis		 0.011974
Bit Error Probability for Baseband and Subcarrier Optical Communication Systems · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1974
Physical-layer communications
optical communication		 0.011974
Bit Error Probability for Baseband and Subcarrier Optical Communication Systems · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1974
Physical-layer communications › modulation › multicarrier modulation
subcarrier modulation		 0.011974
Bit Error Probability for Baseband and Subcarrier Optical Communication Systems · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1974

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

noncoherent detection · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1974 Bit Error Probability for Baseband and Subcarrier Optical Communication Systems
abstract
Digital baseband and digital subcarrier noncoherent optical communication systems are considered in this paper. Expressions are developed for the bit error probability of optical subcarrier systems which use a nonliner polarization modulator and either a one-detector or a two-detector receiver, The expressions are evaluated numerically, and the results are used to compare the one- and two-detector subcarrier systems with the corresponding one- and two-detector baseband systems for a fLxed bit error probability.
Gary M. Lee, Ralph B. Fluchel, Earl A. Paddon, David C. Torretta
 IEEE Trans. Commun.4