Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Magnus Ringerud

dblp:273/9539 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-1276-3350ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 4 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 65% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 35%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key exchange › group key agreement
authenticated group key agreement
0.612022
Signed (Group) Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange with Tight Security · J. Cryptol. 2022
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
key exchange
0.612022
Signed (Group) Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange with Tight Security · J. Cryptol. 2022
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key exchange
signed diffie-hellman
0.612022
Signed (Group) Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange with Tight Security · J. Cryptol. 2022
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › provable security
tight security
0.612022
Signed (Group) Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange with Tight Security · J. Cryptol. 2022
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography
digital signatures
0.212022
Signed (Group) Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange with Tight Security · J. Cryptol. 2022
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › provable security
multi-user security
0.212022
Signed (Group) Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange with Tight Security · J. Cryptol. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

strong computational diffie-hellman assumption · 0.6random oracle model · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Multi-user CDH Problems and the Concrete Security of NAXOS and HMQV
Eike Kiltz, Jiaxin Pan 0001, Doreen Riepel, Magnus Ringerud
CT-RSA4
2022 Signed (Group) Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange with Tight Security
abstract
Abstract We propose the first tight security proof for the ordinary two-message signed Diffie–Hellman key exchange protocol in the random oracle model. Our proof is based on the strong computational Diffie–Hellman assumption and the multiuser security of a digital signature scheme. With our security proof, the signed DH protocol can be deployed with optimal parameters, independent of the number of users or sessions, without the need to compensate any security loss. We abstract our approach with a new notion called verifiable key exchange. In contrast to a known tight three-message variant of the signed Diffie–Hellman protocol (Gjøsteen and Jager, in: Shacham, Boldyreva (eds) CRYPTO 2018, Part II. LNCS, Springer, Heidelberg, 2018), we do not require any modification to the original protocol, and our tightness result is proven in the “Single-Bit-Guess” model which we know can be tightly composed with symmetric cryptographic primitives to establish a secure channel. Finally, we extend our approach to the group setting and construct the first tightly secure group authenticated key exchange protocol.
Jiaxin Pan 0001, Chen Qian 0002, Magnus Ringerud
J. Cryptol.3
2021 Signed Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange with Tight Security
Jiaxin Pan 0001, Chen Qian 0002, Magnus Ringerud
CT-RSA3
2020 Signatures with Tight Multi-user Security from Search Assumptions
Jiaxin Pan 0001, Magnus Ringerud
ESORICS (2)2