Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sandeep Polisetty

dblp:274/2983 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Vision and language · 45% Trustworthy machine learning · 29% Language models and text generation · 10%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal hallucination
knowledge boundary awareness
1.722025
MAC-Tuning: LLM Multi-Compositional Problem Reasoning with Enhanced Knowledge Boundary Awareness · EMNLP 2025
MMBoundary: Advancing MLLM Knowledge Boundary Awareness through Reasoning Step Confidence Calibration · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
confidence calibration
0.912025
MMBoundary: Advancing MLLM Knowledge Boundary Awareness through Reasoning Step Confidence Calibration · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
confidence estimation
0.912025
MAC-Tuning: LLM Multi-Compositional Problem Reasoning with Enhanced Knowledge Boundary Awareness · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
hallucination mitigation
0.912025
MAC-Tuning: LLM Multi-Compositional Problem Reasoning with Enhanced Knowledge Boundary Awareness · EMNLP 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model
0.912025
MMBoundary: Advancing MLLM Knowledge Boundary Awareness through Reasoning Step Confidence Calibration · ACL (1) 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal reasoning
0.912025
MMBoundary: Advancing MLLM Knowledge Boundary Awareness through Reasoning Step Confidence Calibration · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty and calibration
0.912025
MMBoundary: Advancing MLLM Knowledge Boundary Awareness through Reasoning Step Confidence Calibration · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › misinformation detection
fake news detection
0.512021
InfoSurgeon: Cross-Media Fine-grained Information Consistency Checking for Fake News Detection · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph sampling
0.512021
Accelerating graph sampling for graph machine learning using GPUs · EuroSys 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reward design
0.312025
MMBoundary: Advancing MLLM Knowledge Boundary Awareness through Reasoning Step Confidence Calibration · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network training
mini-batch training
0.112021
Accelerating graph sampling for graph machine learning using GPUs · EuroSys 2021
GPUs and heterogeneous computing
GPU graph processing
0.112021
Accelerating graph sampling for graph machine learning using GPUs · EuroSys 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

supervised fine-tuning · 0.9reinforcement learning with multiple reward functions · 0.9instruction tuning · 0.9fine-tuning · 0.9fine-grained information consistency checking · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 MMBoundary: Advancing MLLM Knowledge Boundary Awareness through Reasoning Step Confidence Calibration
abstract
In recent years, multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have made significant progress but continue to face inherent challenges in multimodal reasoning, which requires multi-level (e.g., perception, reasoning) and multi-granular (e.g., multi-step reasoning chain) advanced inferencing.Prior work on estimating model confidence tends to focus on the overall response for training and calibration, but fails to assess confidence in each reasoning step, leading to undesirable hallucination snowballing.In this work, we present MMBoundary, a novel framework that advances the knowledge boundary awareness of MLLMs through reasoning step confidence calibration.To achieve this, we propose to incorporate complementary textual and cross-modal self-rewarding signals to estimate confidence at each step of the MLLM reasoning process.In addition to supervised fine-tuning MLLM on this set of self-rewarding confidence estimation signal for initial confidence expression warm-up, we introduce a reinforcement learning stage with multiple reward functions for further aligning model knowledge and calibrating confidence at each reasoning step, enhancing reasoning chain self-correction.Empirical results show that MMBoundary significantly outperforms existing methods across diverse domain datasets and metrics, achieving an average of 7.5% reduction in multimodal confidence calibration errors and up to 8.3% improvement in task performance 1 .
Zhitao He 0001, Sandeep Polisetty, Zhiyuan Fan, Shujin Wu, Yi R. Fung 0001
ACL (1)2
2025 MAC-Tuning: LLM Multi-Compositional Problem Reasoning with Enhanced Knowledge Boundary Awareness
abstract
The hallucination of non-existent facts by LLMs is an important problem given its widespread adoption across various applications.Previous research addresses this problem by analyzing the internal parameterized knowledge boundaries to estimate confidence.However, these studies focus on the single-problem setting and have not explored the more challenging multi-problem setting, which requires accurately answering multiple questions simultaneously.We introduce a novel method for the multi-problem setting, Multiple Answers and Confidence Stepwise Tuning (MAC-Tuning), that separates the learning of answer prediction and confidence estimation during fine-tuning on instruction data.Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method outperforms baselines by up to 25% in average precision.
Zhitao He 0001, Sandeep Polisetty, Qingyun Wang 0005, Yi R. Fung 0001
EMNLP4
2023 GraphMini: Accelerating Graph Pattern Matching Using Auxiliary Graphs
abstract
Graph pattern matching is a fundamental problem encountered by many common graph mining tasks and the basic building block of several graph mining systems. This paper explores for the first time how to proactively prune graphs to speed up graph pattern matching by leveraging the structure of the query pattern and the input graph. We propose building auxiliary graphs, which are different pruned versions of the graph, during query execution. This requires careful balancing between the upfront cost of building and managing auxiliary graphs and the gains of faster set operations. To this end, we propose GraphMini, a new system that uses query compilation and a new cost model to minimize the cost of building and maintaining auxiliary graphs and maximize gains. Our evaluation shows that using GraphMini can achieve one order of magnitude speedup compared to state-of-the-art subgraph enumeration systems on commonly used benchmarks.
Juelin Liu, Sandeep Polisetty, Hui Guan 0001, Marco Serafini
PACT2
2021 InfoSurgeon: Cross-Media Fine-grained Information Consistency Checking for Fake News Detection
abstract
Yi Fung, Christopher Thomas, Revanth Gangi Reddy, Sandeep Polisetty, Heng Ji, Shih-Fu Chang, Kathleen McKeown, Mohit Bansal, Avi Sil. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2021.
Yi R. Fung 0001, Christopher Thomas 0004, Revanth Gangi Reddy, Sandeep Polisetty, Heng Ji 0001, Shih-Fu Chang, Kathy McKeown, Mohit Bansal, Avirup Sil
ACL/IJCNLP (1)4
2021 Accelerating graph sampling for graph machine learning using GPUs
abstract
Representation learning algorithms automatically learn the features of data. Several representation learning algorithms for graph data, such as DeepWalk, node2vec, and Graph-SAGE, sample the graph to produce mini-batches that are suitable for training a DNN. However, sampling time can be a significant fraction of training time, and existing systems do not efficiently parallelize sampling.
Abhinav Jangda, Sandeep Polisetty, Arjun Guha, Marco Serafini
EuroSys2