Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sandeep Polisetty
dblp:274/2983
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Vision and language · 45% Trustworthy machine learning · 29% Language models and text generation · 10% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal hallucination
knowledge boundary awareness |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | MAC-Tuning: LLM Multi-Compositional Problem Reasoning with Enhanced Knowledge Boundary Awareness · EMNLP 2025 MMBoundary: Advancing MLLM Knowledge Boundary Awareness through Reasoning Step Confidence Calibration · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
confidence calibration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MMBoundary: Advancing MLLM Knowledge Boundary Awareness through Reasoning Step Confidence Calibration · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
confidence estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MAC-Tuning: LLM Multi-Compositional Problem Reasoning with Enhanced Knowledge Boundary Awareness · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
hallucination mitigation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MAC-Tuning: LLM Multi-Compositional Problem Reasoning with Enhanced Knowledge Boundary Awareness · EMNLP 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MMBoundary: Advancing MLLM Knowledge Boundary Awareness through Reasoning Step Confidence Calibration · ACL (1) 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MMBoundary: Advancing MLLM Knowledge Boundary Awareness through Reasoning Step Confidence Calibration · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty and calibration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MMBoundary: Advancing MLLM Knowledge Boundary Awareness through Reasoning Step Confidence Calibration · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › misinformation detection
fake news detection |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | InfoSurgeon: Cross-Media Fine-grained Information Consistency Checking for Fake News Detection · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph sampling |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Accelerating graph sampling for graph machine learning using GPUs · EuroSys 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reward design |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | MMBoundary: Advancing MLLM Knowledge Boundary Awareness through Reasoning Step Confidence Calibration · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network training
mini-batch training |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Accelerating graph sampling for graph machine learning using GPUs · EuroSys 2021 |
GPUs and heterogeneous computing
GPU graph processing |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Accelerating graph sampling for graph machine learning using GPUs · EuroSys 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
supervised fine-tuning · 0.9reinforcement learning with multiple reward functions · 0.9instruction tuning · 0.9fine-tuning · 0.9fine-grained information consistency checking · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | MMBoundary: Advancing MLLM Knowledge Boundary Awareness through Reasoning Step Confidence CalibrationabstractIn recent years, multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have made significant progress but continue to face inherent challenges in multimodal reasoning, which requires multi-level (e.g., perception, reasoning) and multi-granular (e.g., multi-step reasoning chain) advanced inferencing.Prior work on estimating model confidence tends to focus on the overall response for training and calibration, but fails to assess confidence in each reasoning step, leading to undesirable hallucination snowballing.In this work, we present MMBoundary, a novel framework that advances the knowledge boundary awareness of MLLMs through reasoning step confidence calibration.To achieve this, we propose to incorporate complementary textual and cross-modal self-rewarding signals to estimate confidence at each step of the MLLM reasoning process.In addition to supervised fine-tuning MLLM on this set of self-rewarding confidence estimation signal for initial confidence expression warm-up, we introduce a reinforcement learning stage with multiple reward functions for further aligning model knowledge and calibrating confidence at each reasoning step, enhancing reasoning chain self-correction.Empirical results show that MMBoundary significantly outperforms existing methods across diverse domain datasets and metrics, achieving an average of 7.5% reduction in multimodal confidence calibration errors and up to 8.3% improvement in task performance 1 . Zhitao He 0001, Sandeep Polisetty, Zhiyuan Fan, Shujin Wu, Yi R. Fung 0001 |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2025 | MAC-Tuning: LLM Multi-Compositional Problem Reasoning with Enhanced Knowledge Boundary AwarenessabstractThe hallucination of non-existent facts by LLMs is an important problem given its widespread adoption across various applications.Previous research addresses this problem by analyzing the internal parameterized knowledge boundaries to estimate confidence.However, these studies focus on the single-problem setting and have not explored the more challenging multi-problem setting, which requires accurately answering multiple questions simultaneously.We introduce a novel method for the multi-problem setting, Multiple Answers and Confidence Stepwise Tuning (MAC-Tuning), that separates the learning of answer prediction and confidence estimation during fine-tuning on instruction data.Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method outperforms baselines by up to 25% in average precision. Zhitao He 0001, Sandeep Polisetty, Qingyun Wang 0005, Yi R. Fung 0001 |
EMNLP | 4 |
| 2023 | GraphMini: Accelerating Graph Pattern Matching Using Auxiliary GraphsabstractGraph pattern matching is a fundamental problem encountered by many common graph mining tasks and the basic building block of several graph mining systems. This paper explores for the first time how to proactively prune graphs to speed up graph pattern matching by leveraging the structure of the query pattern and the input graph. We propose building auxiliary graphs, which are different pruned versions of the graph, during query execution. This requires careful balancing between the upfront cost of building and managing auxiliary graphs and the gains of faster set operations. To this end, we propose GraphMini, a new system that uses query compilation and a new cost model to minimize the cost of building and maintaining auxiliary graphs and maximize gains. Our evaluation shows that using GraphMini can achieve one order of magnitude speedup compared to state-of-the-art subgraph enumeration systems on commonly used benchmarks. Juelin Liu, Sandeep Polisetty, Hui Guan 0001, Marco Serafini |
PACT | 2 |
| 2021 | InfoSurgeon: Cross-Media Fine-grained Information Consistency Checking for Fake News DetectionabstractYi Fung, Christopher Thomas, Revanth Gangi Reddy, Sandeep Polisetty, Heng Ji, Shih-Fu Chang, Kathleen McKeown, Mohit Bansal, Avi Sil. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2021. Yi R. Fung 0001, Christopher Thomas 0004, Revanth Gangi Reddy, Sandeep Polisetty, Heng Ji 0001, Shih-Fu Chang, Kathy McKeown, Mohit Bansal, Avirup Sil |
ACL/IJCNLP (1) | 4 |
| 2021 | Accelerating graph sampling for graph machine learning using GPUsabstractRepresentation learning algorithms automatically learn the features of data. Several representation learning algorithms for graph data, such as DeepWalk, node2vec, and Graph-SAGE, sample the graph to produce mini-batches that are suitable for training a DNN. However, sampling time can be a significant fraction of training time, and existing systems do not efficiently parallelize sampling. Abhinav Jangda, Sandeep Polisetty, Arjun Guha, Marco Serafini |
EuroSys | 2 |