Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Carl Stahoviak

dblp:274/9801 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot navigation and mapping · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization › odometry
ego-velocity estimation
0.412020
Radar-Inertial Ego-Velocity Estimation for Visually Degraded Environments · ICRA 2020
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization › odometry
radar-inertial odometry
0.412020
Radar-Inertial Ego-Velocity Estimation for Visually Degraded Environments · ICRA 2020
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
sensor fusion
0.412020
Radar-Inertial Ego-Velocity Estimation for Visually Degraded Environments · ICRA 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sliding window · 0.4batch optimization · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Radar-Inertial Ego-Velocity Estimation for Visually Degraded Environments
abstract
We present an approach for estimating the body-frame velocity of a mobile robot. We combine measurements from a millimeter-wave radar-on-a-chip sensor and an inertial measurement unit (IMU) in a batch optimization over a sliding window of recent measurements. The sensor suite employed is lightweight, low-power, and is invariant to ambient lighting conditions. This makes the proposed approach an attractive solution for platforms with limitations around payload and longevity, such as aerial vehicles conducting autonomous exploration in perceptually degraded operating conditions, including subterranean environments. We compare our radar-inertial velocity estimates to those from a visual-inertial (VI) approach. We show the accuracy of our method is comparable to VI in conditions favorable to VI, and far exceeds the accuracy of VI when conditions deteriorate.
Andrew Kramer, Carl Stahoviak, Angel Santamaria-Navarro, Ali-akbar Agha-mohammadi, Christoffer R. Heckman
ICRA2