Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Carl Stahoviak
dblp:274/9801
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Robot navigation and mapping · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization › odometry
ego-velocity estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Radar-Inertial Ego-Velocity Estimation for Visually Degraded Environments · ICRA 2020 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization › odometry
radar-inertial odometry |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Radar-Inertial Ego-Velocity Estimation for Visually Degraded Environments · ICRA 2020 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
sensor fusion |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Radar-Inertial Ego-Velocity Estimation for Visually Degraded Environments · ICRA 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sliding window · 0.4batch optimization · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Radar-Inertial Ego-Velocity Estimation for Visually Degraded EnvironmentsabstractWe present an approach for estimating the body-frame velocity of a mobile robot. We combine measurements from a millimeter-wave radar-on-a-chip sensor and an inertial measurement unit (IMU) in a batch optimization over a sliding window of recent measurements. The sensor suite employed is lightweight, low-power, and is invariant to ambient lighting conditions. This makes the proposed approach an attractive solution for platforms with limitations around payload and longevity, such as aerial vehicles conducting autonomous exploration in perceptually degraded operating conditions, including subterranean environments. We compare our radar-inertial velocity estimates to those from a visual-inertial (VI) approach. We show the accuracy of our method is comparable to VI in conditions favorable to VI, and far exceeds the accuracy of VI when conditions deteriorate. Andrew Kramer, Carl Stahoviak, Angel Santamaria-Navarro, Ali-akbar Agha-mohammadi, Christoffer R. Heckman |
ICRA | 2 |