Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Camille-Sovanneary Gauthier

dblp:275/3206 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 84% Learning theory · 16%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
bandit
1.122022
UniRank: Unimodal Bandit Algorithms for Online Ranking · ICML 2022
Parametric Graph for Unimodal Ranking Bandit · ICML 2021
Information retrieval
ranking
1.122022
UniRank: Unimodal Bandit Algorithms for Online Ranking · ICML 2022
Parametric Graph for Unimodal Ranking Bandit · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
multiple-play bandit
0.612022
UniRank: Unimodal Bandit Algorithms for Online Ranking · ICML 2022
Information retrieval › ranking
online ranking
0.612022
UniRank: Unimodal Bandit Algorithms for Online Ranking · ICML 2022
Information retrieval › user behavior › search behavior › click model
position-based model
0.512021
Parametric Graph for Unimodal Ranking Bandit · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds
0.322022
UniRank: Unimodal Bandit Algorithms for Online Ranking · ICML 2022
Parametric Graph for Unimodal Ranking Bandit · ICML 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

unimodal bandit · 2.1graph learning · 1.0click models · 0.6click model · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 UniRank: Unimodal Bandit Algorithms for Online Ranking
abstract
We tackle, in the multiple-play bandit setting, the online ranking problem of assigning L items to K predefined positions on a web page in order to maximize the number of user clicks. We propose a generic algorithm, UniRank, that tackles state-of-the-art click models. The regret bound of this algorithm is a direct consequence of the pseudo-unimodality property of the bandit setting with respect to a graph where nodes are ordered sets of indistinguishable items. The main contribution of UniRank is its O(L/$\Delta$ logT) regret for T consecutive assignments, where $\Delta$ relates to the reward-gap between two items. This regret bound is based on the usually implicit condition that two items may not have the same attractiveness. Experiments against state-of-the-art learning algorithms specialized or not for different click models, show that our method has better regret performance than other generic algorithms on real life and synthetic datasets.
Camille-Sovanneary Gauthier, Romaric Gaudel, Élisa Fromont
ICML1
2021 Parametric Graph for Unimodal Ranking Bandit
abstract
We tackle the online ranking problem of assigning $L$ items to $K$ positions on a web page in order to maximize the number of user clicks. We propose an original algorithm, easy to implement and with strong theoretical guarantees to tackle this problem in the Position-Based Model (PBM) setting, well suited for applications where items are displayed on a grid. Besides learning to rank, our algorithm, GRAB (for parametric Graph for unimodal RAnking Bandit), also learns the parameter of a compact graph over permutations of $K$ items among $L$. The logarithmic regret bound of this algorithm is a direct consequence of the unimodality property of the bandit setting with respect to the learned graph. Experiments against state-of-the-art learning algorithms which also tackle the PBM setting, show that our method is more efficient while giving regret performance on par with the best known algorithms on simulated and real life datasets.
Camille-Sovanneary Gauthier, Romaric Gaudel, Élisa Fromont, Boammani Aser Lompo
ICML1
2021 Bandit Algorithm for both Unknown Best Position and Best Item Display on Web Pages
Camille-Sovanneary Gauthier, Romaric Gaudel, Élisa Fromont
IDA1