Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jigyasa Gupta
dblp:275/9946
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Robot manipulation · 44% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 44% Language models and text generation · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot manipulation › human-robot interaction
robot instruction following |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | GOALNET: Interleaving Neural Goal Predicate Inference with Classical Planning for Generalization in Robot Instruction Following · AAAI 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
task planning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | GOALNET: Interleaving Neural Goal Predicate Inference with Classical Planning for Generalization in Robot Instruction Following · AAAI 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
natural language instructions |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | GOALNET: Interleaving Neural Goal Predicate Inference with Classical Planning for Generalization in Robot Instruction Following · AAAI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neurosymbolic · 0.8neural network prediction · 0.8classical planners · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | GOALNET: Interleaving Neural Goal Predicate Inference with Classical Planning for Generalization in Robot Instruction FollowingabstractOur goal is to enable a robot to learn how to sequence its actions to perform high-level tasks specified as natural language instructions, given successful demonstrations from a human partner. Our novel neuro-symbolic solution GOALNET builds an iterative two-step approach that interleaves (i) inferring next subgoal predicate implied by the language instruction, for a given world state, and (ii) synthesizing a feasible subgoal-reaching plan from that state. The agent executes the plan, and the two steps are repeated. GOALNET combines (i) learning, where dense representations are acquired for language instruction and the world state via a neural network prediction model, enabling generalization to novel settings and (ii) planning, where the cause-effect modeling by a classical planner eschews irrelevant predicates, facilitating multi-stage decision making in large domains. GOALNET obtains 78% improvement in the goal reaching rate in comparison to several state-of-the-art approaches on benchmark data with multi-stage instructions. Further, GOALNET can generalize to novel instructions for scenes with unseen objects. Source code available at https://github. com/reail-iitd/goalnet. Jigyasa Gupta, Shreya Sharma 0005, Shreshth Tuli, Rohan Paul, Mausam |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2021 | A Variational Information Bottleneck Based Method to Compress Sequential Networks for Human Action RecognitionabstractIn the last few years, deep neural networks' compression has become an important strand of machine learning and computer vision research. Deep models require sizeable computational complexity and storage when used, for instance, for Human Action Recognition (HAR) from videos, making them unsuitable to be deployed on edge devices. In this paper, we address this issue and propose a method to effectively compress Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) such as Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs) and Long-Short-Term-Memory Units (LSTMs) that are used for HAR. We use a Variational Information Bottleneck (VIB) theory-based pruning approach to limit the information flow through the sequential cells of RNNs to a small subset. Further, we combine our pruning method with a specific group-lasso regularization technique that significantly improves compression. The proposed techniques reduce model parameters and memory footprint from latent representations, with little or no reduction in the validation accuracy while increasing the inference speed several-fold. We perform experiments on the three widely used Action Recognition datasets, viz. UCF11, HMDB51, and UCF101, to validate our approach. We show that our method achieves over 70 times greater compression than the nearest competitor with comparable accuracy for action recognition on UCF11. Ayush Srivastava, Oshin Dutta, Jigyasa Gupta, Sumeet Agarwal, Prathosh A. P. |
WACV | 3 |