Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Julian Killingback

dblp:276/4019 · DBLP profile ↗
shortlisted ← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-2280-8759ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers
Information retrieval · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 44% Wearable and physiological sensing · 44% Personal fabrication and tangible interfaces · 13%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
dense retrieval
2.642026
Scaling Laws for Embedding Dimension in Information Retrieval · SIGIR 2026
Hypencoder: Hypernetworks for Information Retrieval · SIGIR 2025
Learning Robust Dense Retrieval Models from Incomplete Relevance Labels · SIGIR 2021
Information retrieval › retrieval models
neural retrieval
0.912025
Hypencoder: Hypernetworks for Information Retrieval · SIGIR 2025
Information retrieval › retrieval models
sparse retrieval
0.912025
Scaling Sparse and Dense Retrieval in Decoder-Only LLMs · SIGIR 2025
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
neural ranking model
0.512021
Learning Robust Dense Retrieval Models from Incomplete Relevance Labels · SIGIR 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

approximate nearest neighbor search · 2.4power-law fitting · 1.0dense retrieval · 1.0knowledge distillation · 0.9hypernetwork · 0.9decoder-only LLMs · 0.9contrastive learning · 0.9pseudo-relevance feedback · 0.5lexical matching · 0.5ultra-wideband radar · 0.4signal processing · 0.4deep learning · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Scaling Laws for Embedding Dimension in Information Retrieval
abstract
Dense retrieval, which encodes queries and documents into a single dense vector, has become the dominant neural retrieval approach due to its simplicity and compatibility with fast approximate nearest neighbor algorithms. As the tasks dense retrieval performs grow in complexity, the fundamental limitations of the underlying data structure and similarity metric---namely vectors and inner-products---become more apparent. Recent work has shown theoretical limitations inherent to single vectors and inner-products, which are generally tied to the embedding dimension. Given the importance of embedding dimension for retrieval capacity, understanding how dense retrieval performance changes as embedding dimension is scaled is fundamental to building next-generation retrieval models that balance effectiveness and efficiency. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between embedding dimension and retrieval performance. Our experiments include a range of model sizes from two model families to construct a detailed picture of embedding scaling behavior. We find that the scaling behavior fits a power law, allowing us to derive scaling laws for performance given only the embedding dimension, as well as a joint law accounting for embedding dimension and model size. Our analysis shows that for evaluation tasks aligned with the training task, performance continues to improve as embedding size increases, though with diminishing returns. For evaluation data that are less aligned with the training task, we find that performance is less predictable, with performance degrading with larger embedding dimensions for certain tasks. We hope our work provides additional insight into the limitations of embeddings and their behavior as well as offers a practical guide for selecting model and embedding dimension to achieve optimal performance with reduced storage and compute costs.
Julian Killingback, Mahta Rafiee, Madine Manas, Hamed Zamani
SIGIR1
2025 Hypencoder: Hypernetworks for Information Retrieval
abstract
Existing information retrieval systems are largely constrained by their reliance on vector inner products to assess query-document relevance, which naturally limits the expressiveness of the relevance score they can produce.We propose a new paradigm; instead of representing a query as a vector, we use a small neural network that acts as a learned query-specific relevance function.This small neural network takes a document representation as input (in this work we use a single vector) and produces a scalar relevance score.To produce the small neural network we use a hypernetwork, a network that produces the weights of other networks, as our query encoder.We name this category of encoder models Hypencoders.Experiments on in-domain search tasks show that Hypencoders significantly outperform strong dense retrieval models and even surpass reranking models and retrieval models with an order of magnitude more parameters.To assess the extent of Hypencoders' capabilities, we evaluate on a set of hard retrieval tasks including tipof-the-tongue and instruction-following retrieval tasks.On harder tasks, we find that the performance gap widens substantially compared to standard retrieval tasks.Furthermore, to demonstrate the practicality of our method, we implement an approximate search algorithm and show that our model is able to retrieve from a corpus of 8.8M documents in under 60 milliseconds.
Julian Killingback, Hansi Zeng, Hamed Zamani
SIGIR1
2025 Scaling Sparse and Dense Retrieval in Decoder-Only LLMs
abstract
Scaling large language models (LLMs) has shown great potential for improving retrieval model performance; however, previous studies have mainly focused on dense retrieval trained with contrastive loss (CL), neglecting the scaling behavior of other retrieval paradigms and optimization techniques, such as sparse retrieval and knowledge distillation (KD). In this work, we conduct a systematic comparative study on how different retrieval paradigms (sparse vs. dense) and fine-tuning objectives (CL vs. KD vs. their combination) affect retrieval performance across different model scales. Using MSMARCO passages as the training dataset, decoder-only LLMs (Llama-3 series: 1B, 3B, 8B), and a fixed compute budget, we evaluate various training configurations on both in-domain (MSMARCO, TREC DL) and out-of-domain (BEIR) benchmarks. Our key findings reveal that: (1) Scaling behaviors emerge clearly only with CL, where larger models achieve significant performance gains, whereas KD-trained models show minimal improvement, performing similarly across the 1B, 3B, and 8B scales. (2) Sparse retrieval models consistently outperform dense retrieval across both in-domain (MSMARCO, TREC DL) and out-of-domain (BEIR) benchmarks, and they demonstrate greater robustness to imperfect supervised signals. (3) We successfully scale sparse retrieval models with the combination of CL and KD losses at 8B scale, achieving state-of-the-art (SOTA) results in all evaluation sets.
Hansi Zeng, Julian Killingback, Hamed Zamani
SIGIR2
2021 Learning Robust Dense Retrieval Models from Incomplete Relevance Labels
abstract
Recent deployment of efficient billion-scale approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) search algorithms on GPUs has motivated information retrieval researchers to develop neural ranking models that learn low-dimensional dense representations for queries and documents and use ANN search for retrieval. However, optimizing these dense retrieval models poses several challenges including negative sampling for (pair-wise) training. A recent model, called ANCE, successfully uses dynamic negative sampling using ANN search. This paper improves upon ANCE by proposing a robust negative sampling strategy for scenarios where the training data lacks complete relevance annotations. This is of particular importance as obtaining large-scale training data with complete relevance judgment is extremely expensive. Our model uses a small validation set with complete relevance judgments to accurately estimate a negative sampling distribution for dense retrieval models. We also explore leveraging a lexical matching signal during training and pseudo-relevance feedback during evaluation for improved performance. Our experiments on the TREC Deep Learning Track benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our solutions.
Prafull Prakash, Julian Killingback, Hamed Zamani
SIGIR2
2020 MechanoBeat: Monitoring Interactions with Everyday Objects using 3D Printed Harmonic Oscillators and Ultra-Wideband Radar
abstract
In this paper we present MechanoBeat, a 3D printed mechanical tag that oscillates at a unique frequency upon user interaction. With the help of an ultra-wideband (UWB) radar array, MechanoBeat can unobtrusively monitor interactions with both stationary and mobile objects. MechanoBeat consists of small, scalable, and easy-to-install tags that do not require any batteries, silicon chips, or electronic components. Tags can be produced using commodity desktop 3D printers with cheap materials. We develop an efficient signal processing and deep learning method to locate and identify tags using only the signals reflected from the tag vibrations. MechanoBeat is capable of detecting simultaneous interactions with high accuracy, even in noisy environments. We leverage UWB radar signals' high penetration property to sense interactions behind walls in a non-line-of-sight (NLOS) scenario. A number of applications using MechanoBeat have been explored and the results have been presented in the paper.
Md. Farhan Tasnim Oshim, Julian Killingback, Dave Follette, Huaishu Peng, Tauhidur Rahman
UIST2