Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Prakhar Verma

dblp:277/3362 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0000-2321-6953ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 77% Deep learning architectures and training · 18% Optimization for machine learning · 5%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process
1.222023
Memory-Based Dual Gaussian Processes for Sequential Learning · ICML 2023
Scalable Inference in SDEs by Direct Matching of the Fokker-Planck-Kolmogorov Equation · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
sequence modeling
0.712023
Memory-Based Dual Gaussian Processes for Sequential Learning · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process › sparse gaussian process
sparse variational gaussian process
0.712023
Memory-Based Dual Gaussian Processes for Sequential Learning · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
fokker-planck equation
0.512021
Scalable Inference in SDEs by Direct Matching of the Fokker-Planck-Kolmogorov Equation · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › continuous-time model
stochastic differential equations
0.512021
Scalable Inference in SDEs by Direct Matching of the Fokker-Planck-Kolmogorov Equation · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
0.212023
Memory-Based Dual Gaussian Processes for Sequential Learning · ICML 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variational inference · 0.7dual sparse variational gaussian process · 0.7stochastic runge-kutta · 0.5moment matching · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Variational Gaussian Process Diffusion Processes
abstract
Diffusion processes are a class of stochastic differential equations (SDEs) providing a rich family of expressive models that arise naturally in dynamic modelling tasks. Probabilistic inference and learning under generative models with latent processes endowed with a non-linear diffusion process prior are intractable problems. We build upon work within variational inference, approximating the posterior process as a linear diffusion process, and point out pathologies in the approach. We propose an alternative parameterization of the Gaussian variational process using a site-based exponential family description. This allows us to trade a slow inference algorithm with fixed-point iterations for a fast algorithm for convex optimization akin to natural gradient descent, which also provides a better objective for learning model parameters.
Prakhar Verma, Vincent Adam, Arno Solin
AISTATS1
2023 Memory-Based Dual Gaussian Processes for Sequential Learning
abstract
Sequential learning with Gaussian processes (GPs) is challenging when access to past data is limited, for example, in continual and active learning. In such cases, errors can accumulate over time due to inaccuracies in the posterior, hyperparameters, and inducing points, making accurate learning challenging. Here, we present a method to keep all such errors in check using the recently proposed dual sparse variational GP. Our method enables accurate inference for generic likelihoods and improves learning by actively building and updating a memory of past data. We demonstrate its effectiveness in several applications involving Bayesian optimization, active learning, and continual learning.
Paul E. Chang, Prakhar Verma, S. T. John, Arno Solin, Mohammad Emtiyaz Khan
ICML2
2021 Scalable Inference in SDEs by Direct Matching of the Fokker-Planck-Kolmogorov Equation
abstract
Simulation-based techniques such as variants of stochastic Runge–Kutta are the de facto approach for inference with stochastic differential equations (SDEs) in machine learning. These methods are general-purpose and used with parametric and non-parametric models, and neural SDEs. Stochastic Runge–Kutta relies on the use of sampling schemes that can be inefficient in high dimensions. We address this issue by revisiting the classical SDE literature and derive direct approximations to the (typically intractable) Fokker–Planck–Kolmogorov equation by matching moments. We show how this workflow is fast, scales to high-dimensional latent spaces, and is applicable to scarce-data applications, where a non-parametric SDE with a driving Gaussian process velocity field specifies the model.
Arno Solin, Ella Tamir, Prakhar Verma
NeurIPS3
2019 M.A.G.E.C: machine assisted geometry extraction and creation
abstract
The GIS industry relies heavily on manual efforts to build and maintain digital maps. This approach is timeconsuming and requires a sizable workforce not only for map-making but also for quality-checks that are required to resolve the potential errors resulting from manual digitization. With recent advancements in computer vision, several organizations are using machine-learning algorithms to generate map data from images. In the current machine learning based geometry creation process three limitations prevails. Firstly, the output of the algorithms is never served on-demand to a map editing tool. Secondly, after being further fine-tuned manually by annotators/validators, the results are never fed back to the algorithms to identify the errors incurred and improve accuracy. Finally, a lot of manual effort is required to create training data for new terrains and regions. We propose an end-to-end machine learning system integrated with current map-making tools to address these limitations and reduce the manual effort in creating and updating geometry.
Fuzail Palnak, Kshitij Nikhal, Prakhar Verma, Ravi Panchani, Sagar Rohankar
ICMV3