Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mahdis Mahdieh
dblp:277/5057
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 61% Question answering and dialogue systems · 30% Representation and self-supervised learning · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › task-oriented dialogue
dialogue state tracking |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Effective Sequence-to-Sequence Dialogue State Tracking · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
masked span prediction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Effective Sequence-to-Sequence Dialogue State Tracking · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
pre-training objectives |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Effective Sequence-to-Sequence Dialogue State Tracking · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation
contextual representation |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Effective Sequence-to-Sequence Dialogue State Tracking · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sequence-to-sequence model · 0.5pre-training · 0.5pegasus · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Effective Sequence-to-Sequence Dialogue State TrackingabstractSequence-to-sequence models have been applied to a wide variety of NLP tasks, but how to properly use them for dialogue state tracking has not been systematically investigated.In this paper, we study this problem from the perspectives of pre-training objectives as well as the formats of context representations.We demonstrate that the choice of pre-training objective makes a significant difference to the state tracking quality.In particular, we find that masked span prediction is more effective than auto-regressive language modeling.We also explore using Pegasus, a span prediction-based pre-training objective for text summarization, for the state tracking model.We found that pre-training for the seemingly distant summarization task works surprisingly well for dialogue state tracking.In addition, we found that while recurrent state context representation works also reasonably well, the model may have a hard time recovering from earlier mistakes.We conducted experiments on the MultiWOZ 2.1-2.4,WOZ 2.0, and DSTC2 datasets with consistent observations. Jeffrey Zhao, Mahdis Mahdieh, Yuan Cao 0007 |
EMNLP (1) | 2 |