Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jinho Choo
dblp:277/6120
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0001-5547-5201ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 27% Language models and text generation · 27% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 17% | |
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization |
1.5 | 3 | 2022 | Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022 Matrix encoding networks for neural combinatorial optimization · NeurIPS 2021 POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization › learning-based combinatorial optimization
neural combinatorial optimization |
1.5 | 3 | 2022 | Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022 Matrix encoding networks for neural combinatorial optimization · NeurIPS 2021 POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | TLPO: Token-Level Policy Optimization for Mitigating Language Confusion in Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
multilingual language models |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | TLPO: Token-Level Policy Optimization for Mitigating Language Confusion in Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit › pure-exploration bandit
active search |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding › decoding strategy
beam search |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
heuristic search |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | VaB-AL: Incorporating Class Imbalance and Difficulty With Variational Bayes for Active Learning · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | VaB-AL: Incorporating Class Imbalance and Difficulty With Variational Bayes for Active Learning · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization › vehicle routing
traveling salesman problem |
0.3 | 2 | 2021 | Matrix encoding networks for neural combinatorial optimization · NeurIPS 2021 POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization
routing problems |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial Optimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | VaB-AL: Incorporating Class Imbalance and Difficulty With Variational Bayes for Active Learning · CVPR 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › scheduling › shop scheduling
flow shop scheduling |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Matrix encoding networks for neural combinatorial optimization · NeurIPS 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization
vehicle routing |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation-guided beam search · 1.1rollout · 1.1active search · 1.1policy optimization · 1.0ORPO · 1.0GRPO · 1.0DPO · 1.0variational bayes · 0.5variational autoencoder · 0.5end-to-end learning · 0.5deep feature representation · 0.5attention mechanism · 0.5augmentation-based inference · 0.4REINFORCE · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | TLPO: Token-Level Policy Optimization for Mitigating Language Confusion in Large Language ModelsabstractLarge language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong multilingual capabilities, yet often fail to consistently generate responses in the intended language, exhibiting a phenomenon known as language confusion.Prior mitigation approaches based on sequence-level fine-tuning, such as DPO, ORPO, and GRPO, operate at the level of entire responses and can lead to unintended degradation of general model capabilities, motivating the need for more fine-grained alternatives.To address this, we introduce Token-Level Policy Optimization (TLPO), a fine-tuning framework designed to mitigate language confusion through localized, token-level updates. TLPO identifies error-prone positions, explores alternative candidate tokens, and updates the policy using a tailored objective to suppress error-inducing outputs at a granular level.This selective intervention enables effective mitigation of language confusion without compromising the model’s general abilities.Experiments on multiple multilingual LLMs across diverse languages demonstrate that TLPO significantly outperforms baselines in improving language consistency while preserving downstream task accuracy. Jinho Choo, JunSeung Lee, Jimyeong Kim, Yeeho Song, S. K. Hong, Yeong-Dae Kwon |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2022 | Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial OptimizationabstractNeural approaches for combinatorial optimization (CO) equip a learning mechanism to discover powerful heuristics for solving complex real-world problems. While neural approaches capable of high-quality solutions in a single shot are emerging, state-of-the-art approaches are often unable to take full advantage of the solving time available to them. In contrast, hand-crafted heuristics perform highly effective search well and exploit the computation time given to them, but contain heuristics that are difficult to adapt to a dataset being solved. With the goal of providing a powerful search procedure to neural CO approaches, we propose simulation-guided beam search (SGBS), which examines candidate solutions within a fixed-width tree search that both a neural net-learned policy and a simulation (rollout) identify as promising. We further hybridize SGBS with efficient active search (EAS), where SGBS enhances the quality of solutions backpropagated in EAS, and EAS improves the quality of the policy used in SGBS. We evaluate our methods on well-known CO benchmarks and show that SGBS significantly improves the quality of the solutions found under reasonable runtime assumptions. Jinho Choo, Yeong-Dae Kwon, Jeongwoo Jae, André Hottung, Kevin Tierney, Youngjune Gwon |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | VaB-AL: Incorporating Class Imbalance and Difficulty With Variational Bayes for Active LearningabstractActive Learning for discriminative models has largely been studied with the focus on individual samples, with less emphasis on how classes are distributed or which classes are hard to deal with. In this work, we show that this is harmful. We propose a method based on the Bayes’ rule, that can naturally incorporate class imbalance into the Active Learning framework. We derive that three terms should be considered together when estimating the probability of a classifier making a mistake for a given sample; i) probability of mislabelling a class, ii) likelihood of the data given a predicted class, and iii) the prior probability on the abundance of a predicted class. Implementing these terms requires a generative model and an intractable likelihood estimation. Therefore, we train a Variational Auto Encoder (VAE) for this purpose. To further tie the VAE with the classifier and facilitate VAE training, we use the classifiers’ deep feature representations as input to the VAE. By considering all three probabilities, among them, especially the data imbalance, we can substantially improve the potential of existing methods under limited data budget. We show that our method can be applied to classification tasks on multiple different datasets – including one that is a real-world dataset with heavy data imbalance – significantly outperforming the state of the art. Jongwon Choi 0002, Kwang Moo Yi, Jinho Choo, Byoungjip Kim, Jin-Yeop Chang, Youngjune Gwon, Hyung Jin Chang |
CVPR | 4 |
| 2021 | Matrix encoding networks for neural combinatorial optimizationabstractMachine Learning (ML) can help solve combinatorial optimization (CO) problems better. A popular approach is to use a neural net to compute on the parameters of a given CO problem and extract useful information that guides the search for good solutions. Many CO problems of practical importance can be specified in a matrix form of parameters quantifying the relationship between two groups of items. There is currently no neural net model, however, that takes in such matrix-style relationship data as an input. Consequently, these types of CO problems have been out of reach for ML engineers. In this paper, we introduce Matrix Encoding Network (MatNet) and show how conveniently it takes in and processes parameters of such complex CO problems. Using an end-to-end model based on MatNet, we solve asymmetric traveling salesman (ATSP) and flexible flow shop (FFSP) problems as the earliest neural approach. In particular, for a class of FFSP we have tested MatNet on, we demonstrate a far superior empirical performance to any methods (neural or not) known to date. Yeong-Dae Kwon, Jinho Choo, Iljoo Yoon, Minah Park, Duwon Park, Youngjune Gwon |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2020 | POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement LearningabstractIn neural combinatorial optimization (CO), reinforcement learning (RL) can turn a deep neural net into a fast, powerful heuristic solver of NP-hard problems. This approach has a great potential in practical applications because it allows near-optimal solutions to be found without expert guides armed with substantial domain knowledge. We introduce Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima (POMO), an end-to-end approach for building such a heuristic solver. POMO is applicable to a wide range of CO problems. It is designed to exploit the symmetries in the representation of a CO solution. POMO uses a modified REINFORCE algorithm that forces diverse rollouts towards all optimal solutions. Empirically, the low-variance baseline of POMO makes RL training fast and stable, and it is more resistant to local minima compared to previous approaches. We also introduce a new augmentation-based inference method, which accompanies POMO nicely. We demonstrate the effectiveness of POMO by solving three popular NP-hard problems, namely, traveling salesman (TSP), capacitated vehicle routing (CVRP), and 0-1 knapsack (KP). For all three, our solver based on POMO shows a significant improvement in performance over all recent learned heuristics. In particular, we achieve the optimality gap of 0.14% with TSP100 while reducing inference time by more than an order of magnitude. Yeong-Dae Kwon, Jinho Choo, Byoungjip Kim, Iljoo Yoon, Youngjune Gwon, Seungjai Min |
NeurIPS | 2 |