Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ke Tran
dblp:277/9454
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Machine translation · 66% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 16% Language models and text generation · 9% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
document-level machine translation |
1.8 | 2 | 2026 | What Does LLM Refinement Actually Improve? A Systematic Study on Document-Level Literary Translation · ACL (1) 2026 The Fine-Tuning Paradox: Boosting Translation Quality Without Sacrificing LLM Abilities · ACL (1) 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
translation refinement |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | What Does LLM Refinement Actually Improve? A Systematic Study on Document-Level Literary Translation · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning › catastrophic forgetting
catastrophic forgetting mitigation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Improving the Quality Trade-Off for Neural Machine Translation Multi-Domain Adaptation · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain adaptation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Improving the Quality Trade-Off for Neural Machine Translation Multi-Domain Adaptation · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
multi-source domain adaptation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Improving the Quality Trade-Off for Neural Machine Translation Multi-Domain Adaptation · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
neural machine translation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Improving the Quality Trade-Off for Neural Machine Translation Multi-Domain Adaptation · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
systematic evaluation · 1.0fine-tuning · 0.8few-shot learning · 0.8elastic weight consolidation · 0.5data mixing · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | What Does LLM Refinement Actually Improve? A Systematic Study on Document-Level Literary TranslationabstractShaomu Tan, Dawei Zhu, Ke Tran, Michael Denkowski, Sony Trenous, Leonardo F. R. Ribeiro, Bill Byrne, Felix Hieber. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Shaomu Tan, Ke Tran, Michael J. Denkowski, Sony Trenous, Leonardo F. R. Ribeiro, William J. Byrne, Felix Hieber |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2024 | The Fine-Tuning Paradox: Boosting Translation Quality Without Sacrificing LLM AbilitiesabstractFine-tuning large language models (LLMs) for machine translation has shown improvements in overall translation quality.However, it is unclear what is the impact of fine-tuning on desirable LLM behaviors that are not present in neural machine translation models, such as steerability, inherent document-level translation abilities, and the ability to produce less literal translations.We perform an extensive translation evaluation on the LLaMA and Falcon family of models with model size ranging from 7 billion up to 65 billion parameters.Our results show that while fine-tuning improves the general translation quality of LLMs, several abilities degrade.In particular, we observe a decline in the ability to perform formality steering, to produce technical translations through few-shot examples, and to perform documentlevel translation.On the other hand, we observe that the model produces less literal translations after fine-tuning on parallel data.We show that by including monolingual data as part of the fine-tuning data we can maintain the abilities while simultaneously enhancing overall translation quality.Our findings emphasize the need for fine-tuning strategies that preserve the benefits of LLMs for machine translation. David Stap, Eva Hasler, William J. Byrne, Christof Monz, Ke Tran |
ACL (1) | 5 |
| 2022 | The Devil is in the Details: On the Pitfalls of Vocabulary Selection in Neural Machine TranslationabstractTobias Domhan, Eva Hasler, Ke Tran, Sony Trenous, Bill Byrne, Felix Hieber. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2022. Tobias Domhan, Eva Hasler, Ke Tran, Sony Trenous, William J. Byrne, Felix Hieber |
NAACL-HLT | 3 |
| 2021 | Improving the Quality Trade-Off for Neural Machine Translation Multi-Domain AdaptationabstractBuilding neural machine translation systems to perform well on a specific target domain is a well-studied problem.Optimizing system performance for multiple, diverse target domains however remains a challenge.We study this problem in an adaptation setting where the goal is to preserve the existing system quality while incorporating data for domains that were not the focus of the original translation system.We find that we can improve over the performance trade-off offered by Elastic Weight Consolidation with a relatively simple data mixing strategy.At comparable performance on the new domains, catastrophic forgetting is mitigated significantly on strong WMT baselines.Combining both approaches improves the Pareto frontier on this task. Eva Hasler, Tobias Domhan, Jonay Trénous, Ke Tran, William J. Byrne, Felix Hieber |
EMNLP (1) | 4 |