Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ke Tran

dblp:277/9454 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Machine translation · 66% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 16% Language models and text generation · 9%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
document-level machine translation
1.822026
What Does LLM Refinement Actually Improve? A Systematic Study on Document-Level Literary Translation · ACL (1) 2026
The Fine-Tuning Paradox: Boosting Translation Quality Without Sacrificing LLM Abilities · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
translation refinement
1.012026
What Does LLM Refinement Actually Improve? A Systematic Study on Document-Level Literary Translation · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning › catastrophic forgetting
catastrophic forgetting mitigation
0.512021
Improving the Quality Trade-Off for Neural Machine Translation Multi-Domain Adaptation · EMNLP (1) 2021
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain adaptation
0.512021
Improving the Quality Trade-Off for Neural Machine Translation Multi-Domain Adaptation · EMNLP (1) 2021
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
multi-source domain adaptation
0.512021
Improving the Quality Trade-Off for Neural Machine Translation Multi-Domain Adaptation · EMNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
neural machine translation
0.512021
Improving the Quality Trade-Off for Neural Machine Translation Multi-Domain Adaptation · EMNLP (1) 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

systematic evaluation · 1.0fine-tuning · 0.8few-shot learning · 0.8elastic weight consolidation · 0.5data mixing · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 What Does LLM Refinement Actually Improve? A Systematic Study on Document-Level Literary Translation
abstract
Shaomu Tan, Dawei Zhu, Ke Tran, Michael Denkowski, Sony Trenous, Leonardo F. R. Ribeiro, Bill Byrne, Felix Hieber. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Shaomu Tan, Ke Tran, Michael J. Denkowski, Sony Trenous, Leonardo F. R. Ribeiro, William J. Byrne, Felix Hieber
ACL (1)3
2024 The Fine-Tuning Paradox: Boosting Translation Quality Without Sacrificing LLM Abilities
abstract
Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) for machine translation has shown improvements in overall translation quality.However, it is unclear what is the impact of fine-tuning on desirable LLM behaviors that are not present in neural machine translation models, such as steerability, inherent document-level translation abilities, and the ability to produce less literal translations.We perform an extensive translation evaluation on the LLaMA and Falcon family of models with model size ranging from 7 billion up to 65 billion parameters.Our results show that while fine-tuning improves the general translation quality of LLMs, several abilities degrade.In particular, we observe a decline in the ability to perform formality steering, to produce technical translations through few-shot examples, and to perform documentlevel translation.On the other hand, we observe that the model produces less literal translations after fine-tuning on parallel data.We show that by including monolingual data as part of the fine-tuning data we can maintain the abilities while simultaneously enhancing overall translation quality.Our findings emphasize the need for fine-tuning strategies that preserve the benefits of LLMs for machine translation.
David Stap, Eva Hasler, William J. Byrne, Christof Monz, Ke Tran
ACL (1)5
2022 The Devil is in the Details: On the Pitfalls of Vocabulary Selection in Neural Machine Translation
abstract
Tobias Domhan, Eva Hasler, Ke Tran, Sony Trenous, Bill Byrne, Felix Hieber. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2022.
Tobias Domhan, Eva Hasler, Ke Tran, Sony Trenous, William J. Byrne, Felix Hieber
NAACL-HLT3
2021 Improving the Quality Trade-Off for Neural Machine Translation Multi-Domain Adaptation
abstract
Building neural machine translation systems to perform well on a specific target domain is a well-studied problem.Optimizing system performance for multiple, diverse target domains however remains a challenge.We study this problem in an adaptation setting where the goal is to preserve the existing system quality while incorporating data for domains that were not the focus of the original translation system.We find that we can improve over the performance trade-off offered by Elastic Weight Consolidation with a relatively simple data mixing strategy.At comparable performance on the new domains, catastrophic forgetting is mitigated significantly on strong WMT baselines.Combining both approaches improves the Pareto frontier on this task.
Eva Hasler, Tobias Domhan, Jonay Trénous, Ke Tran, William J. Byrne, Felix Hieber
EMNLP (1)4