Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Heming Xia
dblp:278/2940
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
8since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-5074-3441ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 3 first-author · 8 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 44% Language models and text generation · 38% Vision and language · 8% |
Topics — the 21 heaviest of 22, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference acceleration |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | SWIFT: On-the-Fly Self-Speculative Decoding for LLM Inference Acceleration · ICLR 2025 SpecVLM: Enhancing Speculative Decoding of Video LLMs via Verifier-Guided Token Pruning · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › inference acceleration
speculative decoding |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | SWIFT: On-the-Fly Self-Speculative Decoding for LLM Inference Acceleration · ICLR 2025 SpecVLM: Enhancing Speculative Decoding of Video LLMs via Verifier-Guided Token Pruning · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
large reasoning model |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Merlin's Whisper: Enabling Efficient Reasoning in Large Language Models via Black-box Persuasive Prompting · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning |
1.0 | 2 | 2024 | A Survey on In-context Learning · EMNLP 2024 AppBench: Planning of Multiple APIs from Various APPs for Complex User Instruction · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › chain-of-thought reasoning
chain-of-thought compression |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | TokenSkip: Controllable Chain-of-Thought Compression in LLMs · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chain-of-thought reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | TokenSkip: Controllable Chain-of-Thought Compression in LLMs · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference efficiency |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | TokenSkip: Controllable Chain-of-Thought Compression in LLMs · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model inference |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SWIFT: On-the-Fly Self-Speculative Decoding for LLM Inference Acceleration · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › adaptive computation
layer skipping |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SWIFT: On-the-Fly Self-Speculative Decoding for LLM Inference Acceleration · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › inference acceleration › speculative decoding
self-speculative decoding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SWIFT: On-the-Fly Self-Speculative Decoding for LLM Inference Acceleration · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
token pruning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SpecVLM: Enhancing Speculative Decoding of Video LLMs via Verifier-Guided Token Pruning · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
token reduction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | TokenSkip: Controllable Chain-of-Thought Compression in LLMs · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards Harmonized Uncertainty Estimation for Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › video-language model
video large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SpecVLM: Enhancing Speculative Decoding of Video LLMs via Verifier-Guided Token Pruning · EMNLP 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
agent planning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | AppBench: Planning of Multiple APIs from Various APPs for Complex User Instruction · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model evaluation › large language model benchmarking
LLM evaluation benchmark |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | AppBench: Planning of Multiple APIs from Various APPs for Complex User Instruction · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model evaluation › LLM agent evaluation
tool-use benchmark |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | AppBench: Planning of Multiple APIs from Various APPs for Complex User Instruction · EMNLP 2024 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal reasoning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Premise-based Multimodal Reasoning: Conditional Inference on Joint Textual and Visual Clues · ACL (1) 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › prompting
prompt engineering |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Merlin's Whisper: Enabling Efficient Reasoning in Large Language Models via Black-box Persuasive Prompting · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | TokenSkip: Controllable Chain-of-Thought Compression in LLMs · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
few-shot learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | A Survey on In-context Learning · EMNLP 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
iterative prompt refinement · 1.0black-box persuasive prompting · 1.0verifier-guided token pruning · 0.9token skipping · 0.9semantic importance analysis · 0.9on-the-fly layer selection · 0.9lightweight corrector model · 0.9layer sparsity · 0.9attention signal · 0.9fine-tuning · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Merlin's Whisper: Enabling Efficient Reasoning in Large Language Models via Black-box Persuasive PromptingabstractLarge reasoning models (LRMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in tackling complex tasks through step-by-step thinking.However, this lengthy reasoning process incurs substantial computational and latency overheads, hindering the practical deployment of LRMs.This work presents a new approach to mitigating overthinking in LRMs via black-box persuasive prompting.By treating LRMs as black-box communicators, we investigate how to persuade them to generate concise responses without compromising accuracy.We introduce WHISPER, an iterative refinement framework that generates high-quality persuasive prompts from diverse perspectives.Experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that WHIS-PER consistently reduces token usage while preserving performance.Notably, WHISPER achieves a 3× reduction in average response length on simple GSM8K questions for the Qwen3 series and delivers an average ∼40% token reduction overall.For closed-source APIs, WHISPER reduces token usage on MATH-500 by 46% for Claude-3.7 and 50% for Gemini-2.5.Further analysis reveals the broad applicability of WHISPER across data domains, model scales, and families, underscoring the potential of black-box persuasive prompting as a practical strategy for enhancing LRM efficiency. 1 * Work done during the author's internship at Sea AI Lab.† Corresponding authors. 1 We release our code and top-performing prompt candidates at https://github.com/hemingkx/Whisper.Question: John arm wrestles 20 people.He beats 80%.How many people did he lose to? Heming Xia, Cunxiao Du, Rui Li 0094, Chak Tou Leong, Yongqi Li 0001, Wenjie Li 0002 |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2025 | Towards Harmonized Uncertainty Estimation for Large Language ModelsabstractTo facilitate robust and trustworthy deployment of large language models (LLMs), it is essential to quantify the reliability of their generations through uncertainty estimation.While recent efforts have made significant advancements by leveraging the internal logic and linguistic features of LLMs to estimate uncertainty scores, our empirical analysis highlights the pitfalls of these methods to strike a harmonized estimation between indication, balance, and calibration, which hinders their broader capability for accurate uncertainty estimation.To address this challenge, we propose CUE (Corrector for Uncertainty Estimation): A straightforward yet effective method that employs a lightweight model trained on data aligned with the target LLM's performance to adjust uncertainty scores.Comprehensive experiments across diverse models and tasks demonstrate its effectiveness, which achieves consistent improvements of up to 60% over existing methods.Resources are available at https://github. com/O-L1RU1/Corrector4UE. Rui Li 0094, Jing Long, Muge Qi, Heming Xia, Lei Sha, Peiyi Wang, Zhifang Sui |
ACL (1) | 4 |
| 2025 | SpecVLM: Enhancing Speculative Decoding of Video LLMs via Verifier-Guided Token PruningabstractVideo large language models (Vid-LLMs) have shown strong capabilities in understanding video content.However, their reliance on dense video token representations introduces substantial memory and computational overhead in both prefilling and decoding.To mitigate the information loss of recent video token reduction methods and accelerate the decoding stage of Vid-LLMs losslessly, we introduce SPECVLM, a training-free speculative decoding (SD) framework tailored for Vid-LLMs that incorporates staged video token pruning.Building on our novel finding that the draft model's speculation exhibits low sensitivity to video token pruning, SPECVLM prunes up to 90% of video tokens to enable efficient speculation without sacrificing accuracy.To achieve this, we perform a two-stage pruning process: Stage I selects highly informative tokens guided by attention signals from the verifier (target model), while Stage II prunes the remaining redundant ones in a spatially uniform manner.Extensive experiments on four video understanding benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of SPECVLM, which achieves up to 2.68× decoding speedup for LLaVA-OneVision-72B and 2.11× speedup for Qwen2.5-VL-32B.Code is available at https: //github.com/zju-jiyicheng/SpecVLM. Yicheng Ji, Jun Zhang 0069, Heming Xia, Jinpeng Chen 0001, Lidan Shou, Gang Chen 0001, Huan Li 0003 |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2025 | TokenSkip: Controllable Chain-of-Thought Compression in LLMsabstractChain-of-Thought (CoT) has been proven effective in enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs).Recent advancements, such as OpenAI's o1 and DeepSeek-R1, suggest that scaling up the length of CoT sequences during inference could further boost LLM reasoning performance.However, due to the autoregressive nature of LLM decoding, longer CoT outputs lead to a linear increase in inference latency, adversely affecting user experience, particularly when the CoT exceeds 10,000 tokens.To address this limitation, we analyze the semantic importance of tokens within CoT outputs and reveal that their contributions to reasoning vary.Building on this insight, we propose TokenSkip, a simple yet effective approach that enables LLMs to selectively skip less important tokens, allowing for controllable CoT compression.Extensive experiments across various models and tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of TokenSkip in reducing CoT token usage while preserving strong reasoning performance.Notably, when applied to Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct,TokenSkip reduces reasoning tokens by 40% (from 313 to 181) on GSM8K, with less than a 0.4% performance drop.We release our code and checkpoints in https: //github.com/hemingkx/TokenSkip. Heming Xia, Chak Tou Leong, Wenjie Wang 0007, Yongqi Li 0001, Wenjie Li 0002 |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2025 | SWIFT: On-the-Fly Self-Speculative Decoding for LLM Inference AccelerationabstractSpeculative decoding (SD) has emerged as a widely used paradigm to accelerate LLM inference without compromising quality. It works by first employing a compact model to draft multiple tokens efficiently and then using the target LLM to verify them in parallel. While this technique has achieved notable speedups, most existing approaches necessitate either additional parameters or extensive training to construct effective draft models, thereby restricting their applicability across different LLMs and tasks. To address this limitation, we explore a novel plug-and-play SD solution with layer-skipping, which skips intermediate layers of the target LLM as the compact draft model. Our analysis reveals that LLMs exhibit great potential for self-acceleration through layer sparsity and the task-specific nature of this sparsity. Building on these insights, we introduce SWIFT, an on-the-fly self-speculative decoding algorithm that adaptively selects intermediate layers of LLMs to skip during inference. SWIFT does not require auxiliary models or additional training, making it a plug-and-play solution for accelerating LLM inference across diverse input data streams. Our extensive experiments across a wide range of models and downstream tasks demonstrate that SWIFT can achieve over a $1.3\times$$\sim$$1.6\times$ speedup while preserving the original distribution of the generated text. We release our code in https://github.com/hemingkx/SWIFT. Heming Xia, Yongqi Li 0001, Jun Zhang 0069, Cunxiao Du, Wenjie Li 0002 |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2024 | AppBench: Planning of Multiple APIs from Various APPs for Complex User InstructionabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs) can interact with the real world by connecting with versatile external APIs, resulting in better problemsolving and task automation capabilities.Previous research primarily focuses on APIs with limited arguments from a single source or overlooks the complex dependency relationship between different APIs.However, it is essential to utilize multiple APIs collaboratively from various sources (e.g., different Apps in the iPhone), especially for complex user instructions.In this paper, we introduce AppBench, the first benchmark to evaluate LLMs' ability to plan and execute multiple APIs from various sources in order to complete the user's task.Specifically, we consider two significant challenges in multiple APIs: 1) graph structures: some APIs can be executed independently while others need to be executed one by one, resulting in graph-like execution order; and 2) permission constraints: which source is authorized to execute the API call.We have experimental results on 9 distinct LLMs; e.g., GPT-4o achieves only a 2.0% success rate at the most complex instruction, revealing that the existing state-of-the-art LLMs still cannot perform well in this situation even with the help of in-context learning and finetuning. Hongru Wang 0003, Rui Wang 0092, Boyang Xue, Heming Xia, Jingtao Cao, Zeming Liu, Jeff Z. Pan, Kam-Fai Wong |
EMNLP | 4 |
| 2024 | A Survey on In-context LearningabstractQingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Ce Zheng, Jingyuan Ma, Rui Li, Heming Xia, Jingjing Xu, Zhiyong Wu, Baobao Chang, Xu Sun, Lei Li, Zhifang Sui. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2024. Qingxiu Dong, Lei Li 0039, Damai Dai, Jingyuan Ma, Rui Li 0094, Heming Xia, Jingjing Xu 0001, Zhiyong Wu 0011, Baobao Chang, Xu Sun 0001, Lei Li 0005, Zhifang Sui |
EMNLP | 7 |
| 2022 | Premise-based Multimodal Reasoning: Conditional Inference on Joint Textual and Visual CluesabstractQingxiu Dong, Ziwei Qin, Heming Xia, Tian Feng, Shoujie Tong, Haoran Meng, Lin Xu, Zhongyu Wei, Weidong Zhan, Baobao Chang, Sujian Li, Tianyu Liu, Zhifang Sui. Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2022. Qingxiu Dong, Ziwei Qin, Heming Xia, Shoujie Tong, Haoran Meng, Zhongyu Wei, Weidong Zhan, Baobao Chang, Sujian Li, Tianyu Liu 0001, Zhifang Sui |
ACL (1) | 3 |