Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Giancarlo A. Xompero

dblp:278/4871 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.912025
Private Memorization Editing: Turning Memorization into a Defense to Strengthen Data Privacy in Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › knowledge in language models
memorization
0.912025
Private Memorization Editing: Turning Memorization into a Defense to Strengthen Data Privacy in Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2025
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving machine learning
0.912025
Private Memorization Editing: Turning Memorization into a Defense to Strengthen Data Privacy in Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

training data extraction attacks · 1.7model editing · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Private Memorization Editing: Turning Memorization into a Defense to Strengthen Data Privacy in Large Language Models
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) memorize, and thus, among huge amounts of uncontrolled data, may memorize Personally Identifiable Information (PII), which should not be stored and, consequently, not leaked. In this paper, we introduce Private Memorization Editing (PME), an approach for preventing private data leakage that turns an apparent limitation, that is, the LLMs' memorization ability, into a powerful privacy defense strategy. While attacks against LLMs have been performed exploiting previous knowledge regarding their training data, our approach aims to exploit the same kind of knowledge in order to make a model more robust. We detect a memorized PII and then mitigate the memorization of PII by editing a model knowledge of its training data. We verify that our procedure does not affect the underlying language model while making it more robust against privacy Training Data Extraction attacks. We demonstrate that PME can effectively reduce the number of leaked PII in a number of configurations, in some cases even reducing the accuracy of the privacy attacks to zero.
Elena Sofia Ruzzetti, Giancarlo A. Xompero, Davide Venditti, Fabio Massimo Zanzotto
ACL (1)2
2022 Every time I fire a conversational designer, the performance of the dialogue system goes down
abstract
Incorporating handwritten domain scripts into neural-based task-oriented dialogue systems may be an effective way to reduce the need for large sets of annotated dialogues. In this paper, we investigate how the use of domain scripts written by conversational designers affects the performance of neural-based dialogue systems. To support this investigation, we propose the Conversational-Logic-Injection-in-Neural-Network system (CLINN) where domain scripts are coded in semi-logical rules. By using CLINN, we evaluated semi-logical rules produced by a team of differently-skilled conversational designers. We experimented with the Restaurant domain of the MultiWOZ dataset. Results show that external knowledge is extremely important for reducing the need for annotated examples for conversational systems. In fact, rules from conversational designers used in CLINN significantly outperform a state-of-the-art neural-based dialogue system when trained with smaller sets of annotated dialogues.
Giancarlo A. Xompero, Michele Mastromattei, Samir Salman, Cristina Giannone, Andrea Favalli, Raniero Romagnoli, Fabio Massimo Zanzotto
LREC1