Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
H. Alperen Çetin
dblp:278/7385
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-9879-8599ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Empirical software engineering › developer studies › developer expertise
developer expertise identification |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Identifying the most valuable developers using artifact traceability graphs · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2019 |
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Identifying the most valuable developers using artifact traceability graphs · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
graph analysis · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Incidents During Microservice Decomposition: A Case StudyabstractSoftware errors and incidents are inevitable in web-based applications. Scalability challenges, increasing demand, and ongoing code changes can contribute to such failures. As software architectures evolve rapidly, understanding how and why incidents occur is crucial for enhancing system reliability. In this study, we introduce Carbon Health’s software stack, share our microservices journey, and analyze 107 incidents. Based on these incidents, we share insights and lessons learned on microservice decomposition. Finally, we suggest that starting with monolithic modularization as an initial step toward microservice decomposition may help reduce incidents and contribute to building more resilient software. Dogaç Eldenk, H. Alperen Çetin |
EASE | 2 |
| 2022 | Analyzing developer contributions using artifact traceability graphs
H. Alperen Çetin, Eray Tüzün |
Empir. Softw. Eng. | 1 |
| 2021 | A review of code reviewer recommendation studies: Challenges and future directions
H. Alperen Çetin, Emre Dogan, Eray Tüzün |
Sci. Comput. Program. | 1 |
| 2019 | Identifying the most valuable developers using artifact traceability graphsabstractFinding the most valuable and indispensable developers is a crucial task in software development. We categorize these valuable developers into two categories: connector and maven. A typical connector represents a developer who connects different groups of developers in a large-scale project. Mavens represent the developers who are the sole experts in specific modules of the project. H. Alperen Çetin |
ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE | 1 |