Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marek I. Irland

dblp:28/10570 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1980
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
2 papers
Routing and switching · 43% Wireless networking · 24% Internet architecture and protocols · 18%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Routing and switching
packet switch
0.011980
Comparison of two packet-retransmission techniques (Corresp.) · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1980
Wireless networking
retransmission
0.011980
Comparison of two packet-retransmission techniques (Corresp.) · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1980
Internet architecture and protocols
buffer management
0.011978
Buffer Management in a Packet Switch · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1978
Routing and switching
packet switching
0.011978
Buffer Management in a Packet Switch · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1978
Network performance modeling
queueing network model
0.011980
Comparison of two packet-retransmission techniques (Corresp.) · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1980
Network performance modeling › queueing network model
tandem queue
0.011980
Comparison of two packet-retransmission techniques (Corresp.) · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1980
Performance modeling and evaluation
queueing models
0.011978
Buffer Management in a Packet Switch · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1978

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.0queueing analysis · 0.0local balance · 0.0analytic modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1980 Comparison of two packet-retransmission techniques (Corresp.)
abstract
Two methods of dealing with the overflow problem in packet switches are compared: switch-retransmission and host-retransmission. The comparison is based on approximate analytic models of tandem queueing networks and is verified by simulation.
Marek I. Irland, Guy Pujolle
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
1978 Buffer Management in a Packet Switch
abstract
Consider a single packet switch with a finite number of packet buffers shared between several output queues. An arriving packet is lost if no free buffer is available, as in the CIGALE network. It has been observed by simulation that if load increases too much, congestion may occur, i.e., throughput declines; it appears that the busiest link's queue tends to hog the buffers. Therefore, we will limit the queue length and when the queue is full the packet will be dropped. We expect that this restricted buffer sharing policy will avoid congestion under conditions of heavy load. A queueing model of a packet switch is defined and solved by local balance. Loss probability is evaluated, and values of queue limit to minimize loss are found; they depend on load. A Square-Root rule is introduced to make the choice of queue limit independent of load. For a sample switch, with three output links, a comparison is made between performance under different buffer sharing policies; it is shown that restricted sharing prevents congestion by making throughput an increasing function of load.
Marek I. Irland
IEEE Trans. Commun.1
1970 Bounce-and-Skip. A Technique for Directing the Flow of Control in Programs
abstract
A new technique for directing the flow of control in block structured programs is described. It allows a programmer to delay using the outcome of a test indefinitely, and to make the entry and exit of begin-end blocks conditional upon the last test performed. It was designed as a low-level technique in terms of which all the block structure control statements common in high-level programming languages can be implemented easily and efficiently. This technique is the main tool for directing the flow of control in the programming language NUCLEOL, and is considered to be particularly useful for program debugging.
Jürg Nievergelt, Marek I. Irland
Comput. J.2