Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marek I. Irland
dblp:28/10570
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1980
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
2 papers |
Routing and switching · 43% Wireless networking · 24% Internet architecture and protocols · 18% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Routing and switching
packet switch |
0.0 | 1 | 1980 | Comparison of two packet-retransmission techniques (Corresp.) · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1980 |
Wireless networking
retransmission |
0.0 | 1 | 1980 | Comparison of two packet-retransmission techniques (Corresp.) · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1980 |
Internet architecture and protocols
buffer management |
0.0 | 1 | 1978 | Buffer Management in a Packet Switch · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1978 |
Routing and switching
packet switching |
0.0 | 1 | 1978 | Buffer Management in a Packet Switch · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1978 |
Network performance modeling
queueing network model |
0.0 | 1 | 1980 | Comparison of two packet-retransmission techniques (Corresp.) · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1980 |
Network performance modeling › queueing network model
tandem queue |
0.0 | 1 | 1980 | Comparison of two packet-retransmission techniques (Corresp.) · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1980 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
queueing models |
0.0 | 1 | 1978 | Buffer Management in a Packet Switch · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1978 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.0queueing analysis · 0.0local balance · 0.0analytic modeling · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980 | Comparison of two packet-retransmission techniques (Corresp.)abstractTwo methods of dealing with the overflow problem in packet switches are compared: switch-retransmission and host-retransmission. The comparison is based on approximate analytic models of tandem queueing networks and is verified by simulation. Marek I. Irland, Guy Pujolle |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 1978 | Buffer Management in a Packet SwitchabstractConsider a single packet switch with a finite number of packet buffers shared between several output queues. An arriving packet is lost if no free buffer is available, as in the CIGALE network. It has been observed by simulation that if load increases too much, congestion may occur, i.e., throughput declines; it appears that the busiest link's queue tends to hog the buffers. Therefore, we will limit the queue length and when the queue is full the packet will be dropped. We expect that this restricted buffer sharing policy will avoid congestion under conditions of heavy load. A queueing model of a packet switch is defined and solved by local balance. Loss probability is evaluated, and values of queue limit to minimize loss are found; they depend on load. A Square-Root rule is introduced to make the choice of queue limit independent of load. For a sample switch, with three output links, a comparison is made between performance under different buffer sharing policies; it is shown that restricted sharing prevents congestion by making throughput an increasing function of load. Marek I. Irland |
IEEE Trans. Commun. | 1 |
| 1970 | Bounce-and-Skip. A Technique for Directing the Flow of Control in ProgramsabstractA new technique for directing the flow of control in block structured programs is described. It allows a programmer to delay using the outcome of a test indefinitely, and to make the entry and exit of begin-end blocks conditional upon the last test performed. It was designed as a low-level technique in terms of which all the block structure control statements common in high-level programming languages can be implemented easily and efficiently. This technique is the main tool for directing the flow of control in the programming language NUCLEOL, and is considered to be particularly useful for program debugging. Jürg Nievergelt, Marek I. Irland |
Comput. J. | 2 |