Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Philipp Görz

dblp:280/7837 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 5 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
3 papers
Systems and software security · 61% Web and mobile security · 39%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
3 papers
Software testing · 90% Program analysis · 10%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Web and mobile security › web application vulnerability
business logic vulnerability
1.012026
Anota: Identifying Business Logic Vulnerabilities via Annotation-Based Sanitization · NDSS 2026
Systems and software security
program analysis
1.012026
Anota: Identifying Business Logic Vulnerabilities via Annotation-Based Sanitization · NDSS 2026
Systems and software security
vulnerability discovery
1.012026
Anota: Identifying Business Logic Vulnerabilities via Annotation-Based Sanitization · NDSS 2026
Software testing
fuzzing
0.922024
Systematic Assessment of Fuzzers using Mutation Analysis · USENIX Security Symposium 2023
Atropos: Effective Fuzzing of Web Applications for Server-Side Vulnerabilities · USENIX Security Symposium 2024
Systems and software security
memory safety
0.812024
A Binary-level Thread Sanitizer or Why Sanitizing on the Binary Level is Hard · USENIX Security Symposium 2024
Web and mobile security
web security
0.812024
Atropos: Effective Fuzzing of Web Applications for Server-Side Vulnerabilities · USENIX Security Symposium 2024
Software testing › fuzzing
fuzzer benchmarking
0.712023
Systematic Assessment of Fuzzers using Mutation Analysis · USENIX Security Symposium 2023
Program analysis
dynamic analysis
0.212024
A Binary-level Thread Sanitizer or Why Sanitizing on the Binary Level is Hard · USENIX Security Symposium 2024
Software testing › fuzzing
web application fuzzing
0.212024
Atropos: Effective Fuzzing of Web Applications for Server-Side Vulnerabilities · USENIX Security Symposium 2024
Software testing
mutation testing
0.212023
Systematic Assessment of Fuzzers using Mutation Analysis · USENIX Security Symposium 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

thread sanitization · 1.5binary instrumentation · 1.5static analysis · 1.0annotation-based analysis · 1.0mutation analysis · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Anota: Identifying Business Logic Vulnerabilities via Annotation-Based Sanitization
Meng Wang 0071, Philipp Görz, Joschua Schilling, Keno Hassler, Thorsten Holz, Ali Abbasi 0002
NDSS2
2024 Atropos: Effective Fuzzing of Web Applications for Server-Side Vulnerabilities
Emre Güler, Sergej Schumilo, Moritz Schloegel, Nils Bars, Philipp Görz, Cemal Kaygusuz, Thorsten Holz
USENIX Security Symposium5
2024 A Binary-level Thread Sanitizer or Why Sanitizing on the Binary Level is Hard
Joschua Schilling, Andreas Wendler, Philipp Görz, Nils Bars, Moritz Schloegel, Thorsten Holz
USENIX Security Symposium3
2023 Systematic Assessment of Fuzzers using Mutation Analysis
Philipp Görz, Björn Mathis, Keno Hassler, Emre Güler, Thorsten Holz, Andreas Zeller, Rahul Gopinath
USENIX Security Symposium1
2020 Cupid : Automatic Fuzzer Selection for Collaborative Fuzzing
abstract
Combining the strengths of individual fuzzing methods is an appealing idea to find software faults more efficiently, especially when the computing budget is limited. In prior work, EnFuzz introduced the idea of ensemble fuzzing and devised three heuristics to classify properties of fuzzers in terms of diversity. Based on these heuristics, the authors manually picked a combination of different fuzzers that collaborate.
Emre Güler, Philipp Görz, Elia Geretto, Andrea Jemmett, Sebastian Österlund, Herbert Bos, Cristiano Giuffrida, Thorsten Holz
ACSAC2