Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lu-Chi Liu

dblp:280/8578 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery
drug repurposing
0.512021
PanGPCR: predictions for multiple targets, repurposing and side effects · Bioinform. 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery › target identification
drug target prediction
0.512021
PanGPCR: predictions for multiple targets, repurposing and side effects · Bioinform. 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery
drug side effect prediction
0.112021
PanGPCR: predictions for multiple targets, repurposing and side effects · Bioinform. 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

molecular docking · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 PanGPCR: predictions for multiple targets, repurposing and side effects
abstract
SUMMARY: Drug discovery targeting G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the largest known class of therapeutic targets, is challenging. To facilitate the rapid discovery and development of GPCR drugs, we built a system, PanGPCR, to predict multiple potential GPCR targets and their expression locations in the tissues, side effects and possible repurposing of GPCR drugs. With PanGPCR, the compound of interest is docked to a library of 36 experimentally determined crystal structures comprising of 46 docking sites for human GPCRs, and a ranked list is generated from the docking studies to assess all GPCRs and their binding affinities. Users can determine a given compound's GPCR targets and its repurposing potential accordingly. Moreover, potential side effects collected from the SIDER (Side-Effect Resource) database and mapped to 45 tissues and organs are provided by linking predicted off-targets and their expressed sequence tag profiles. With PanGPCR, multiple targets, repurposing potential and side effects can be determined by simply uploading a small ligand. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: PanGPCR is freely accessible at https://gpcrpanel.cmdm.tw/index.html. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Lu-Chi Liu, Ming-Yang Ho, Bo-Han Su, San-Yuan Wang, Ming-Tsung Hsu, Yufeng J. Tseng
Bioinform.1
2020 eFLINT: a domain-specific language for executable norm specifications
abstract
Software systems that share potentially sensitive data are subjected to laws, regulations, policies and/or contracts. The monitoring, control and enforcement processes applied to these systems are currently to a large extent manual, which we rather automate by embedding the processes as dedicated and adaptable software services in order to improve efficiency and effectiveness. This approach requires such regulatory services to be closely aligned with a formal description of the relevant norms.
L. Thomas van Binsbergen, Lu-Chi Liu, Robert van Doesburg, Tom M. van Engers
GPCE2
2020 Digital Enforceable Contracts (DEC): Making Smart Contracts Smarter
abstract
The combination of smart contracts with blockchain technology enables the authentication of the contract and limits the risks of non-compliance. In principle, smart contracts can be processed more efficiently compared to traditional paper-based contracts. However, current smart contracts have very limited capabilities with respect to normative representations, making them too distant from actual contracts. In order to reduce this gap, the paper presents an architectural analysis to see the role of computational artifacts in terms of various ex-ante and ex-post enforcement mechanisms. The proposed framework is assessed using scenarios concerning data-sharing operations bound by legal requirements from the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and data-sharing agreements.
Lu-Chi Liu, Giovanni Sileno, Tom M. van Engers
JURIX1