Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Harry Coppock
dblp:282/4615
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-2404-8319ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 4 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computing education · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Audio and music processing · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Wearable and physiological sensing · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Audio and music processing › speech analysis
paralinguistic analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | The ACM Multimedia 2022 Computational Paralinguistics Challenge: Vocalisations, Stuttering, Activity, & Mosquitoes · ACM Multimedia 2022 |
Wearable and physiological sensing › activity tracking
smartwatch-based activity monitoring |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | The ACM Multimedia 2022 Computational Paralinguistics Challenge: Vocalisations, Stuttering, Activity, & Mosquitoes · ACM Multimedia 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reward design analysis · 1.7benchmark checklist · 1.7end-to-end sequential modelling · 1.1deepspectrum · 1.1compare · 1.1audeep · 1.1CNN · 1.1BoAW · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Establishing Best Practices in Building Rigorous Agentic BenchmarksabstractBenchmarks are essential for quantitatively tracking progress in AI. As AI agents become increasingly capable, researchers and practitioners have introduced agentic benchmarks to evaluate agents on complex, real-world tasks. These benchmarks typically measure agent capabilities by evaluating task outcomes via specific reward designs. However, we show that many agentic benchmarks have issues in task setup or reward design. For example, SWE-bench-Verified uses insufficient test cases, while $\tau$-bench counts empty responses as successes. Such issues can lead to under- or overestimation of agents’ performance by up to 100% in relative terms. To make agentic evaluation rigorous, we introduce the Agentic Benchmark Checklist (ABC), a set of guidelines that we synthesized from our benchmark-building experience, a survey of best practices, and previously reported issues. When applied to CVE-Bench, a benchmark with a particularly complex evaluation design, ABC reduces performance overestimation by 33%. Yuxuan Zhu 0003, Tengjun Jin, Yada Pruksachatkun, Andy Zhang, Sasha Cui, Sayash Kapoor, Shayne Longpre, Kevin Meng, Rebecca Weiss, Fazl Barez, Rahul Gupta 0001, Jwala Dhamala, Jacob Merizian, Mario Giulianelli, Harry Coppock, Cozmin Ududec, Antony Kellermann, Jasjeet S. Sekhon, Jacob Steinhardt, Sarah Schwettmann, Arvind Narayanan, Matei Zaharia, Ion Stoica, Percy Liang, Daniel Kang 0001 |
NeurIPS | 16 |
| 2024 | Synthia's Melody: A Benchmark Framework for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation in AudioabstractDespite significant advancements in deep learning for vision and natural language, unsupervised domain adaptation in audio remains relatively unexplored. We, in part, attribute this to the lack of an appropriate benchmark dataset. To address this gap, we present Synthia’s melody, a novel audio data generation framework capable of simulating an infinite variety of 4-second melodies with user-specified confounding structures characterised by musical keys, timbre, and loudness. Unlike existing datasets collected under observational settings, Synthia’s melody is free of unobserved biases, ensuring the reproducibility and comparability of experiments. To showcase its utility, we generate two types of distribution shifts—domain shift and sample selection bias—and evaluate the performance of acoustic deep learning models under these shifts. Our evaluations reveal that Synthia’s melody provides a robust testbed for examining the susceptibility of these models to varying levels of distribution shift. Chia-Hsin Lin, Charles Jones, Björn W. Schuller, Harry Coppock, Alican Akman |
ICASSP | 4 |
| 2024 | Neural Compression Augmentation for Contrastive Audio Representation Learning
Haohe Liu, Harry Coppock, Björn W. Schuller, Mark D. Plumbley |
INTERSPEECH | 3 |
| 2023 | Audio Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Audio Representation LearningabstractThe Barlow Twins self-supervised learning objective requires neither negative samples or asymmetric learning updates, achieving results on a par with the current state-of-the-art within Computer Vision. As such, we present Audio Barlow Twins, a novel self-supervised audio representation learning approach, adapting Barlow Twins to the audio domain. We pre-train on the large-scale audio dataset AudioSet, and evaluate the quality of the learnt representations on 18 tasks from the HEAR 2021 Challenge, achieving results which outperform, or otherwise are on a par with, the current state-of-the-art for instance discrimination self-supervised learning approaches to audio representation learning. Code at https://github.com/jonahanton/SSL_audio. Jonah Anton, Harry Coppock, Pancham Shukla, Björn W. Schuller |
ICASSP | 2 |
| 2022 | The ACM Multimedia 2022 Computational Paralinguistics Challenge: Vocalisations, Stuttering, Activity, & MosquitoesabstractThe ACM Multimedia 2022 Computational Paralinguistics Challenge addresses four different problems for the first time in a research competition under well-defined conditions: In the Vocalisations and Stuttering Sub-Challenges, a classification on human non-verbal vocalisations and speech has to be made; the Activity Sub-Challenge aims at beyond-audio human activity recognition from smartwatch sensor data; and in the Mosquitoes Sub-Challenge, mosquitoes need to be detected. We describe the Sub-Challenges, baseline feature extraction, and classifiers based on the 'usual' ComParE and BoAW features, the auDeep toolkit, and deep feature extraction from pre-trained CNNs using the DeepSpectrum toolkit; in addition, we add end-to-end sequential modelling, and a log-mel-128-BNN. Björn W. Schuller, Anton Batliner, Shahin Amiriparian, Christian Bergler, Maurice Gerczuk, Natalie Holz, Pauline Larrouy-Maestri, Sebastian P. Bayerl, Korbinian Riedhammer, Adria Mallol-Ragolta, Maria Pateraki, Harry Coppock, Ivan Kiskin, Marianne Sinka, Stephen J. Roberts |
ACM Multimedia | 12 |
| 2021 | Detecting COVID-19 from Breathing and Coughing Sounds using Deep Neural NetworksabstractThe COVID-19 pandemic has affected the world unevenly; while industrial economies have been able to produce the tests necessary to track the spread of the virus and mostly avoided complete lockdowns, developing countries have faced issues with testing capacity. In this paper, we explore the usage of deep learning models as a ubiquitous, low-cost, pre-testing method for detecting COVID-19 from audio recordings of breathing or coughing taken with mobile devices or via the web. We adapt an ensemble of Convolutional Neural Networks that utilise raw breathing and coughing audio and spectrograms to classify if a speaker is infected with COVID-19 or not. The different models are obtained via automatic hyperparameter tuning using Bayesian Optimisation combined with HyperBand. The proposed method outperforms a traditional baseline approach by a large margin. Ultimately, it achieves an Unweighted Average Recall (UAR) of 74.9%, or an Area Under ROC Curve (AUC) of 80.7% by ensembling neural networks, considering the best test set result across breathing and coughing in a strictly subject independent manner. In isolation, breathing sounds thereby appear slightly better suited than coughing ones (76.1% vs 73.7% UAR). Mina A. Nessiem, Mostafa M. Mohamed, Harry Coppock, Alexander Gaskell, Björn W. Schuller |
CBMS | 3 |