Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Onno Eberhard

dblp:284/9076 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 79% Learning theory · 21%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › partially observable reinforcement learning
memory-based reinforcement learning
0.912025
Partially Observable Reinforcement Learning with Memory Traces · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
partially observable reinforcement learning
0.912025
Partially Observable Reinforcement Learning with Memory Traces · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy evaluation
0.912025
Partially Observable Reinforcement Learning with Memory Traces · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity
0.912025
Partially Observable Reinforcement Learning with Memory Traces · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration
0.712023
Pink Noise Is All You Need: Colored Noise Exploration in Deep Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

exponential moving average · 0.9eligibility traces · 0.9pink noise · 0.7colored noise · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Partially Observable Reinforcement Learning with Memory Traces
abstract
Partially observable environments present a considerable computational challenge in reinforcement learning due to the need to consider long histories. Learning with a finite window of observations quickly becomes intractable as the window length grows. In this work, we introduce *memory traces*. Inspired by eligibility traces, these are compact representations of the history of observations in the form of exponential moving averages. We prove sample complexity bounds for the problem of offline on-policy evaluation that quantify the return errors achieved with memory traces for the class of Lipschitz continuous value estimates. We establish a close connection to the window approach, and demonstrate that, in certain environments, learning with memory traces is significantly more sample efficient. Finally, we underline the effectiveness of memory traces empirically in online reinforcement learning experiments for both value prediction and control.
Onno Eberhard, Michael Muehlebach, Claire Vernade
ICML1
2023 Pink Noise Is All You Need: Colored Noise Exploration in Deep Reinforcement Learning
Onno Eberhard, Jakob J. Hollenstein, Cristina Pinneri, Georg Martius
ICLR1